「recommend rule」の検索結果

Recommend runtime and V2 scene management: run recommendation requests, manage recommend scenes and rules, and verify the deployed recommendation path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive BPA rule generation for Power BI semantic models; guided discovery, model investigation, and expert rule authoring. Automatically invoke when the user mentions "BPA rule", "Best Practice Analyzer", or asks to "create a BPA rule", "audit BPA rules", "recommend BPA rules", "set up BPA for my team", "check model for best practices", "validate BPA rules", "improve a BPA expression".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude Codeが読み込むエージェント、スキル、ルール、MCP設定の情報量を点検するスキル。重複や長すぎる定義を見つけ、削減案を優先順位付きで示します。

• コンテキストがすぐ埋まる原因調査
• スキルやMCP追加後の設定点検
• 長いファイルや指示の重複確認

Use this skill when the user is tuning a live or captured `doca-flow` pipeline with `doca_flow_tune` — snapshotting pipe / counter / KPI state, picking a tuning axis (rule placement, resource hints / table sizing, HW-offload mode) and a matching measurement (rule-install rate, lookup latency, hardware-counter delta), running offline or online (read-only or state-changing) modes, reading the dumper CSV / analyze JSON / visualize mermaid, or applying a recommendation back into the Flow program. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "doca_flow_tune" — typical implicit phrasings include "Flow rule-install rate is low on BlueField", "table sizing looks wrong for this pipe", "tune visualize step is empty", "before/after counters don't move", or "which doca-flow knob does this recommendation hit". Refuse and route elsewhere for measuring baseline numbers (doca-flow-perf, doca-flow-dpa-perf), writing the doca-flow application, DOCA install, or streaming Flow telemetry — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this agent when you need to review UniProt annotation rules (ARBA, UniRule) for quality, biological accuracy, and GO annotation appropriateness. This agent performs comprehensive analysis of rule condition sets, evaluates literature support, assesses taxonomic scope, and recommends curation actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose a product's growth model, stage, and current constraint, then route the request to the narrowest Gingiris specialist and execute it when installed. Use for broad or uncertain growth questions involving go-to-market, Product Hunt, GitHub stars, open-source marketing, B2B SaaS, PLG, ASO, SEO/GEO, AI citations, KOL outreach, UGC, international expansion, user interviews, competitor research, or community programs. Trigger when users ask “how do I grow or launch this,” “which growth skill should I use,” 怎么增长、怎么发布、出海、冷启动、增长策略、不知道用哪个 skill、開発者マーケティング, or 성장 전략. Includes B2B pipeline and B2C activation-retention model selection, specialist handoff rules, relevant gingiris.tools recommendations, and advisory-services guidance.

MUST USE when reviewing ClickHouse schemas, queries, or configurations. Contains 31 rules that MUST be checked before providing recommendations. Always read relevant rule files and cite specific rules in responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a Rule 506(d) bad actor disqualification review for private securities offerings, including a covered persons register, tailored questionnaires mapping to each disqualifying event category, a documented reasonable-care diligence record, and classification analysis of flagged events with remediation or disclosure recommendations. Use this skill when conducting Rule 506(d) diligence, identifying covered persons for a Regulation D offering, drafting bad actor questionnaires, or analyzing potential disqualifying events involving criminal convictions, SEC orders, SRO sanctions, or state regulatory actions. Also trigger when the user mentions bad actor screening, covered persons analysis, Rule 506(d) questionnaire, disqualification waiver, or reasonable care defense. Even if the user just says "bad actor check" or "506(d) diligence," use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a dataset or access rule before it joins an identity-graph build (access rules behave like datasets in NQL here). Enumerates failure modes (hub identifiers, high-degree nodes, suspicious values, over-connected identifiers), tests hypotheses in parallel, quantifies damage by rows / edges / entities, and proposes minimal filters ranked by severity. When issues are found, returns a validated `CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW` NQL the caller can run to produce a graph-ready clean source; if the data passes, says so and recommends it unchanged. Plans and authors the clean-view NQL; does not execute it. Use when: "audit this dataset before the graph build", "find bad edges in <source>", "check identity data quality", "recommend filters for the graph build", "quantify damage from <identifier_type>", "pre-graph DQ". (narrative-identity)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

判断が必要な課題を一文で整理し、三つの選択肢の長所・短所と推奨案をまとめます。完了条件と実行手順も添え、チームに共有する提案づくりを支えます。

• 技術的な判断の選択肢を比較したいとき
• チームに共有する提案づくり
• ツールや移行方針の比較

Use this skill when the user is invoking doca_flow_dpa_perf on DPA-capable hardware (ConnectX-7 minimum supported, ConnectX-8 recommended, or BlueField-3) to measure rule update / disable rates on the DPA-offloaded DOCA Flow path — picking the active / passive device split, choosing workload-shape axes (burst, queue, completion threshold, workers, hash pipe algo, PSL tables), or reading Kops/sec iteration stats and the optional self-test. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "doca_flow_dpa_perf" or "DPA Provider" — typical implicit phrasings include "how fast can the DPA program path-selector entries", "baseline rule-update rate on ConnectX-8", "tool reports zero ops on my BlueField", "self-test sentinel never shows on tcpdump", or "is my BlueField-2 DPA-capable". Refuse and route elsewhere for the host / DPU-CPU Flow path (doca-flow-perf), Flow pipeline tuning (doca-flow-tune), writing doca-flow / doca-dpa applications, or DOCA install — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only audit of a GitHub repository's security posture. Gathers ref protection (rulesets AND classic branch protection), Actions token permissions, code and supply-chain features (Dependabot, secret scanning, push protection, CodeQL), and repo hygiene toggles via `gh api`, then classifies findings against essential / recommended / advanced tiers into a PASS/GAP report. Makes NO changes. Use when reviewing a repo before open-sourcing or a release, auditing a public user-owned repo whose CI auto-commits to the default branch, verifying a hardening change actually took effect, or producing a baseline security posture report for a repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

機械学習のない既存アプリに、推薦・分類・予測などを追加するための手順を整理します。課題とデータの確認から、最初のモデルの学習・評価・組み込みまでを支援します。

• 既存アプリに推薦機能を加えたいとき
• 学習データの準備状況を確認したいとき
• 代替ルール付きで予測を組み込みたいとき

Measure mesh files against Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) rules and report printability findings per process (FDM, SLS, SLA/DLP, metal PBF, MJF). Use when the user asks whether a part is printable, wants overhang/wall-thickness/support analysis of an `.stl`, `.obj`, `.ply`, or `.3mf` mesh, wants a build-orientation recommendation, or wants DfAM redesign guidance before slicing with `$gcode` or regenerating geometry with `$cad`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the agent is about to recommend or apply a change that touches DPU / NIC hardware state on a live system — mlxconfig firmware-parameter write, NIC firmware burn, BFB reflash, NIC ↔ DPU mode flip, SR-IOV or device-emulation slot enable, kernel boot-parameter change (IOMMU, hugepages, VFIO), PCIe rebind / rescan / link-state flip, or BlueField cold reboot. Wraps the change in pre-flight inventory, OOB reachability, a maintenance window, the mlxconfig cold-power-cycle rule, replica rehearsal, and rollback. Trigger even when the user does not say "hardware safety" — implicit phrasings: "flip BlueField mode over SSH", "enable SR-IOV and reboot", "burned firmware but mlxconfig shows old value", "reflashed BFB and lost representors", "reflash during business hours", "vendor says this is one-way". Refuse for general DOCA orientation (doca-public-knowledge-map), install or env debug (doca-setup), and program-side debug (doca-debug, doca-programming-guide) — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "personalize the email", "add merge tags / dynamic content", "set up conditional blocks per segment", or "make first-name and product-recommendation fields fall back safely"; produces a merge-tag map with per-tag fallbacks, conditional-block rules with per-segment variations, a fallback-safety audit, and a PII guard on what may render, informing the SEND E (Engagement/personalization) dimension. Not for building the segments — use list-segment-builder; not for writing the base copy — use email-creative-builder; not for scoring EQS or running vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件个性化/合并标签/条件内容块/兜底默认值

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS security service suitability, coverage and cost recommendations: WAF/origin overlap, AWS Network Firewall inspection coverage and policy review, VPC endpoint, Transit Gateway/Cloud WAN segmentation and DNS Firewall security-control suitability, certificate renewal ownership and monitoring, incident response triage ownership, centralized security log store (CloudWatch or Security Lake). Also factual configuration, findings, data sources and severity scoring for GuardDuty, Inspector, Security Hub V2/OCSF (Exposure, connectors, automation), Security Hub CSPM/ASFF (standards, controls), Macie, Detective, Security Lake, AWS Security Incident Response membership and case coverage, and Organizations security policies. Applies to advisory security-service choices even when one service is named. Implementation, rule or code authoring, deployment, scans and troubleshooting outside these factual procedures belong to specialist skills. Supports local AWS CLI and AWS MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts an audited medical research gap into a complete, structured, gap-traceable study design. Always use this skill whenever a user already has one or more candidate research gaps and wants to transform them into an executable biomedical research plan rather than re-run broad topic ideation. Covers six gap-to-design patterns (evidence-completion, mechanism-resolution, cell-state/context-mapping, translation-bridge, causality-upgrade, population/stage-specific) and always outputs one recommended primary protocol, a gap-to-design dependency map, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and verified design-support literature rules. Never fabricate references. Preserve claim-evidence discipline and do not replace a topic-specific gap with a generic workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze weekly marketing campaign performance data across channels. Use when analyzing multi-channel digital marketing data to calculate funnel metrics (CTR, CVR) and compare to benchmarks, compute cost and revenue efficiency metrics (ROAS, CPA, Net Profit), or get budget reallocation recommendations based on performance rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze weekly marketing campaign performance data across channels. Use when analyzing multi-channel digital marketing data to calculate funnel metrics (CTR, CVR) and compare to benchmarks, compute cost and revenue efficiency metrics (ROAS, CPA, Net Profit), or get budget reallocation recommendations based on performance rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save the current business state to disk so future Claude Code sessions can pick up where you left off. Captures confirmed conclusions, ruled-out directions, open hypotheses, and the next recommended skill. Use when the user has just reached a conclusion in /money-discover, /money-strategy, /money-diagnose, or any pipeline phase, and wants to lock the state in. Also triggered by: 'save this', 'checkpoint', 'remember this', 'lock it in', '保存', '存档', '记下来', '这个结论留着'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converges an underspecified request into a typed IntentSpec before planning or acting. Use when the user asks to implement, add, change, refactor, fix, migrate, configure, handle, triage, sort out, look into or decide something and the request leaves decisions open (which objects, which approach, what happens on failure, which trade-off), contradicts itself, admits two readings, or rests on an approach its sources may rule out — in a codebase, a ticket queue, a research brief or a runbook — or when the user says "clarify the intent", "what do you need from me", or invokes intent-router. Looks up what its sources hold (code, history, decision records, a ticket log, an order record, the policy in force) before asking; asks only preference or irreversible questions, one at a time, with a recommended default; halts instead of guessing; checks the delivered work against the spec. Silent on a fully stated task its sources do not contradict. Not for explaining existing state ("what does X do", "why is Y slow").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspects and configures the web application firewall (WAF) in front of a Power Pages production site. Lists the current state, recommends enabling protection when it is off, and walks the user through adding, updating, or removing custom rules — IP blocks, country blocks, path blocks, and rate limits. Use when the user wants to turn on WAF, block traffic by IP or country, rate-limit login or signup pages, protect pages from brute-force attempts, restrict access to specific paths, review the current firewall configuration, or asks "is my site protected against bots / common web attacks?" — even if they say "add rate limit" or "protect login page" without mentioning "firewall" or "WAF".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right LLM for LEGAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS — issue-spotting, rule application, case/statute analysis, memos, and multi-step agentic research. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 benchmarks (Vals AI LegalBench across 124 models; Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark for agentic work). Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model for legal research / case analysis / a memo", "best AI for legal reasoning", "route this research task", or is starting legal analysis without a fixed model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。