「regulation」の検索結果

Analyzes how multiple regulations interact for a specific product, service, or business model. Identifies where obligations overlap, reinforce, complement, duplicate, or conflict; builds a priority matrix; produces an integrated compliance timeline; and estimates the total compliance burden. Use when (1) scoping a new product or service against the full regulatory landscape before launch, (2) conducting M&A due diligence on a target's multi-regulation exposure, (3) building a strategic compliance roadmap where single-regulation analyses miss the interactions, (4) advising on complex situations where regulations touch the same conduct from different angles, or (5) estimating budget and resourcing for multi-regulation compliance. Primary coverage of EU digital regulation (GDPR, Data Act, AI Act, CRA, NIS2, DORA, DMA, DSA, ePrivacy) and national implementations; the framework extends to any jurisdiction where overlapping regulatory regimes apply to the same activity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU AI Act Knowledge Engine — authoritative regulatory Q&A grounded in 70 official EU source documents (including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 high-risk classification — general principles, Annex I, Annex III). Answers any question about the AI Act with article-level citations from the full regulation text, Commission guidelines, EDPB/EDPS opinions, codes of practice, harmonised standards, FRIA guides, incident templates, and sector-specific guidance. This skill should be used when the user asks about the "EU AI Act", "AI Act regulation", "Regulation 2024/1689", "KI-Verordnung", asks to "explain an AI Act article", "what does Article X say", "AI Act requirements", "AI Act penalties", "AI Act timeline", "GPAI obligations", "high-risk AI", "prohibited AI practices", "AI Act and GDPR", "fundamental rights impact assessment", "AI Act standards", "AI Act national implementation", "AI literacy", "serious incident reporting", "Digital Omnibus", "AI regulatory sandbox", or any question about EU artificial intelligence regulation. Also triggers on German terms: "KI-Gesetz", "KI-Verordnung", "Hochrisiko-KI", "KI-Kompetenz", "Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung", "GPAI-Verhaltenskodex". For assessment workflows that produce a classification decision rather than a knowledge answer, offer to run a structured risk-tier classification in-session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diff a new AI regulation or guidance against your current governance posture — surfaces gaps, priorities, and a remediation plan with owners and deadlines. Use when an AI regulation moves (or you learn about one you missed), or when user says "new reg just dropped", "does [regulation] affect us", "gap analysis for EU AI Act", "compliance check against [AI law or guidance]", or pastes regulatory text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

United Arab Emirates Governance, Risk & Compliance advisor — a jurisdiction-first compliance router. In the UAE, WHERE an organization sits determines its law: mainland (Federal PDPL, Decree-Law 45/2021 — executive regulations still pending), DIFC (DP Law No. 5 of 2020 as amended 2025, with a private right of action), ADGM (DP Regulations 2021), CBUAE-licensed financial institutions (consumer-data residency, outsourcing approvals), healthcare (ICT Health Law data localization), and government/CNI (UAE IA Regulation, Cyber Security Council; Dubai ISR, ADHICS). Use for any UAE / Dubai / Abu Dhabi / Emirates compliance question: UAE data protection, DIFC or ADGM privacy, free-zone vs mainland obligations, health-data residency, CBUAE cyber and outsourcing rules, market entry ("expanding to the UAE"), breach notification, gap assessments, and mapping UAE requirements to ISO 27001 / NIST CSF / SOC 2. Trigger for any UAE privacy, cybersecurity, or regulatory question even if no framework is named.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates standalone interactive HTML "deal cards" that translate complex regulations into negotiation-ready reference tools, systematically distinguishing mandatory obligations from negotiable implementation choices. Use when the user needs an interactive regulatory guide for (1) contract negotiation support, (2) client education or internal training, (3) regulatory briefings for commercial stakeholders, or (4) structured comparison between required and flexible compliance paths. Primary focus on EU digital regulation (Data Act, AI Act, CRA, DORA, NIS2, GDPR) but the structural pattern transfers to any regulation where separating hard obligations from implementation choice is the point. Supports bilingual output where the jurisdiction calls for it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU Digital Regulation Legal Analysis Forge — generates a tailored expert prompt for structured legal analysis of an EU digital-regulation document, optionally executes it in-session, and always produces a plain-English explainer alongside the formal output. Handles Regulations, Directives, Commission Guidelines, EDPB Opinions, CJEU and AG judgments, national DPA decisions, codes of conduct, and draft consultations across the EU digital stack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU Data Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/2854) skill for lawyers. Use when the user asks about Data Act classification, drafting, lookup, analysis, or audit. Triggers include "Data Act", "Regulation 2023/2854", "connected product", "related service", "data processing service", "DPS switching", "Article 3(2) pre-contract", "Article 25 contract", "trade-secret handbrake", "international government access", "Chapter VI cloud switching", "Article 50 timeline", "FAQ Q22a", "data holder", "exportable data", "functional equivalence", "Art. 4(10) competing product", and similar EU Data Act phrases. The skill produces lawyer-style Word output and cites verbatim from bundled regulation and FAQ source texts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate scaffolds supporting student self-regulation across planning, monitoring, and evaluation phases. Use when students struggle to manage their own learning during extended or independent tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support EU Market Abuse Regulation concerns, market surveillance, suspicious order and transaction reports, insider dealing controls, unlawful disclosure controls, market manipulation detection, inside information disclosure workflows, insider-list evidence, PDMR transaction notifications, alert explainability, model or rule provenance, reviewer decisions, or compliance escalation. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java trading surveillance system for MAR controls; Design suspicious order and transaction monitoring evidence; Add alert explainability and reviewer-decision audit trails; Assess AI-assisted market-abuse detection before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate scaffolds supporting student self-regulation across planning, monitoring, and evaluation phases. Use when students struggle to manage their own learning during extended or independent tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query Amazon is latest policy, regulation, and compliance feed. Supports paginated browsing by marketplace and time range (with AI-generated Chinese summaries), and fetching full article body by record ID. Trigger when users mention Amazon policies & regulations, seller compliance announcements, platform rule changes, policy alerts, FBA/fee policy updates, multi-marketplace policy tracking, policy original text, news details, or similar terms. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "policy feed," trigger this skill whenever the request involves Amazon is officially published policies, regulations, and news for sellers, including their full text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive GDPR compliance assessments by evaluating data processing activities against EU Regulation 2016/679, including Article 30 records of processing, lawful basis validation, data subject rights implementation, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) under Article 35, breach notification procedures, international transfer safeguards (SCCs, adequacy decisions), and technical/organizational measures under Article 32. Use when processing personal data of EU residents, preparing for supervisory authority audits, implementing privacy-by-design for new systems, scoping compliance gaps for M&A due diligence, assessing third-party processors, or responding to data subject access requests at scale. Incorporates 2026 guidance from ICO, EDPB, and post-Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 UK-GDPR considerations. Do not use for implementing specific Article 32 controls — use implementing-gdpr-data-protection-controls; or for DSAR automation — use implementing-gdpr-data-subject-access-request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diff a new or changed regulation against current privacy policy and practice — outputs a gap list and a remediation plan with owners and dates. Use when a new reg drops, the user asks "does [regulation] affect us", "gap analysis for [state privacy law]", "compliance check against [reg]", or pastes regulatory text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition from Dec 2, 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case areas, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations including the July 2025 Code of Practice (Arts. 51–55), conformity assessment and CE marking (Arts. 43–48), EU AI database registration, Art. 50 transparency (chatbots, synthetic media, AI-generated content), governance (AI Office, AI Board), penalties (Art. 99), confirmed phase-in timeline (Digital Omnibus, Reg. (EU) 2026/1744, in force July 27, 2026: Annex III deferred to Dec 2, 2027; Annex I to Aug 2, 2028), and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use for any EU AI regulation, AI system classification, or AI compliance question. Current as of August 2026. GPAI enforcement powers active since August 2, 2026.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Statute and regulation interpretation framework. Use when reading statutes, classifying requirements, analyzing operative keywords, applying canons of construction, or mapping compliance obligations from legislative text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess obligations under Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 for connected products, related services, statutory B2B data sharing, unfair data-contract terms, exceptional-need B2G requests, data-processing-service switching, international governmental access, interoperability, smart contracts, enforcement, and non-EU representatives. Use for Data Act scope analysis, gap assessments, product and service design, request handling, contract review, cloud exit planning, or cross-regulation mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Practitioner skill for advising on EU Regulation 2023/2854 (Data Act). Covers Chapters II-VII (IoT data access, mandatory B2B sharing, unfair contract terms, public-sector exceptional need, cloud switching, third-country governmental access) and Chapter VIII (interoperability and smart contracts, gate-only). Use when the user asks about Data Act rights or obligations, drafts a Data Act notice or letter, reviews a data-sharing or cloud-switching contract under the Data Act, runs a Data Act gap analysis, or asks how the Data Act interacts with GDPR, the DMA, the Trade Secrets Directive, or sectoral law. Triggers include "Data Act", "Datengesetz", "Regulation (EU) 2023/2854", "Art. 4(1) request", "Art. 5(1) third-party request", "trade-secret handbrake", "cloud switching obligations", "Chapter VI", "Ch V exceptional need", and references to specific Data Act articles or recitals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition from Dec 2, 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case areas, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations including the July 2025 Code of Practice (Arts. 51–55), conformity assessment and CE marking (Arts. 43–48), EU AI database registration, Art. 50 transparency (chatbots, synthetic media, AI-generated content), governance (AI Office, AI Board), penalties (Art. 99), confirmed phase-in timeline (Digital Omnibus adopted June 29, 2026: Annex III deferred to Dec 2, 2027; Annex I to Aug 2, 2028), and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use for any EU AI regulation, AI system classification, or AI compliance question. Current as of July 2026. GPAI enforcement powers activate August 2, 2026.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially stress-tests a legal text — a contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — for interpretive ambiguity: it finds the seams where the people governed by it will later disagree about what it means and turns each into a concrete dispute scenario with both sides' arguments, the likely outcome, and a fix. Use it whenever someone wants to pressure-test, red-team, audit, or find weak spots, loopholes, gaps, ambiguities, or drafting problems in a legal document; whenever a drafter wants to tighten a contract, statute, regulation, or opinion before it issues; whenever a litigator wants to mine an opinion or contract for arguments; or whenever someone hands over a legal text and asks where it will be fought over or for issue-spotting. Trigger it for contract review, statutory-ambiguity analysis, judicial-opinion scope analysis, and drafting QA — even if the user never says "stress-test" or "ambiguity."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design trauma-informed classroom practices that prioritise safety, predictability, connection, and regulation. Use when student behaviour may be trauma-related or the class needs a sensitive approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning of Stuart Russell, AI safety expert, UC Berkeley professor, and co-author of 'Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach'. Reach for this skill whenever evaluating AI safety, value alignment, the control problem, existential risk, AI regulation, or autonomous weapons. Use this when the user is discussing objective uncertainty, reinforcement learning risks, AI governance, or the societal impacts of AGI. Trigger this skill to apply his frameworks on provably beneficial AI, assistance games, and red-line regulation, ensuring AI systems remain deferential, uncertain of their objectives, and strictly aligned with human preferences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning of Stuart Russell, AI safety expert, UC Berkeley professor, and co-author of 'Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach'. Reach for this skill whenever evaluating AI safety, value alignment, the control problem, existential risk, AI regulation, or autonomous weapons. Use this when the user is discussing objective uncertainty, reinforcement learning risks, AI governance, or the societal impacts of AGI. Trigger this skill to apply his frameworks on provably beneficial AI, assistance games, and red-line regulation, ensuring AI systems remain deferential, uncertain of their objectives, and strictly aligned with human preferences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design trauma-informed classroom practices that prioritise safety, predictability, connection, and regulation. Use when student behaviour may be trauma-related or the class needs a sensitive approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Downloads Dutch official legal publications including national laws, local regulations, and implementation policies from government sources (wetten.overheid.nl, lokaleregelgeving.overheid.nl). Use this skill proactively when: user mentions downloading, fetching, or importing a Dutch law by name or BWB/CVDR identifier, when a source.regulation reference points to a law not in the corpus, or when user provides a wetten.overheid.nl URL. Activate automatically when user mentions a specific Dutch law name, BWB identifier (BWBR...), or CVDR identifier.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。