「review」の検索結果

Trustpilot customer reviews scraper for any company listed on trustpilot.com — given a company domain (e.g. shopify.com, apple.com, shopwagandtail.com) plus optional filters (page number, single star rating 1-5, single language ISO code, verified-only flag, has-company-reply flag, date period last30days/last3months/last6months/last12months, free-text keyword search, and reviewer countryCode client-side filter), extracts paginated reviews with 20+ fields per review: reviewId, reviewUrl, reviewTitle, reviewDescription, reviewRatingScore (1-5), reviewDate (ISO publishedDate), reviewDateOfExperience, reviewLabel, isReviewVerified, reviewer (display name), reviewerId, reviewersCountry (ISO Alpha-2), reviewLanguage, reviewCompanyResponse (the company reply text), plus pagination metadata (currentPage, totalPages, totalCount). Optional flags add reviewer profile metadata (reviewerNumberOfReviews, reviewerProfileIsVerified), reply analysis dates (companyReplyPublishedDate, companyReplyUpdatedDate), extended metadata (reviewSource, reviewVerificationSource, reviewLikes), and review photos. Use when user mentions Trustpilot reviews, scrape Trustpilot, get reviews from Trustpilot, Trustpilot review scraper, Trustpilot customer reviews, extract Trustpilot reviews, Trustpilot review data, download Trustpilot reviews, paginate Trustpilot, paginated Trustpilot reviews, filter Trustpilot reviews by star, filter Trustpilot by language, verified reviews Trustpilot, has reply Trustpilot, company response Trustpilot, Trustpilot reply analysis, brand monitoring Trustpilot, sentiment analysis Trustpilot, competitor reviews Trustpilot, bulk reviews from a Trustpilot page, batch download reviews, trustpilot.com reviews scraping, fake review research Trustpilot, Trustpilot dataset, persona research from Trustpilot reviews, Trustpilot keyword search reviews, Trustpilot date range reviews, review export Trustpilot. Also applies to comparing review trends across competitors, training data for LLM sentiment classifiers, monitoring competitor response time, exporting reviews for BI dashboards, lead generation from active reviewers, ML / fake-review detection, and aggregator sites that display third-party reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walmart product reviews scraper: given a walmart.com product item ID, navigate to the reviews page and extract paginated customer reviews including reviewId, rating, title, review text, author nickname, submission date, verified purchase status, helpful votes, variant selected (color/size), badges, fulfilled by, seller name, and photo count. Use when user mentions walmart reviews, walmart product reviews, walmart customer reviews, scrape walmart reviews, extract walmart reviews, walmart review scraper, walmart ratings and reviews, walmart review data, walmart review text, walmart review pagination, get reviews from walmart, walmart review collector, walmart verified purchase reviews, walmart review analysis, walmart sentiment analysis, walmart review export, walmart buyer feedback. Also applies to bulk collection of walmart product reviews across multiple items, sentiment analysis on walmart reviews for market research, competitor product review benchmarking on walmart, and monitoring new walmart reviews over time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch and analyze Amazon product reviews by ASIN, supporting 15 marketplaces (including US) with star rating filtering. Triggered when users mention Amazon reviews, US reviews, product reviews, buyer complaints, negative reviews, positive reviews, star ratings, review analysis, review sentiment, product improvement suggestions, Vine reviews, verified purchase reviews, competitor review research, Amazon reviews, US reviews, Amazon.com reviews, product feedback, negative review analysis, positive review analysis, star rating filter, review sentiment analysis, product improvement insights, Vine reviews, competitor reviews, customer feedback. Even if users do not explicitly say "reviews", this skill should be triggered whenever the task involves reading, filtering, or analyzing Amazon product customer reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified pull request workflow: prepare a safe branch, run read-only review, fix Required findings, create/update a GitHub draft PR, and verify CI plus automated review comments. Subcommands: `create` (simplify + PR, skip code review), `review` (read-only findings only), `fix` (Required fixes + commit, no push), `simplify` (simplification only), `verify` (existing PR checks/reviews only). Use when creating or reviewing PRs, self-reviewing changes, simplifying PR changes, or requesting "PR作成", "レビュー", "簡素化". Do NOT use for responding to review comments or a lightweight review of the current working diff without the PR workflow (use the built-in /code-review instead).

5つの専門エージェント（backend-reviewer, frontend-reviewer, test-reviewer, security-reviewer, ux-reviewer）がチームでコードレビューするスキル。 git diff ベースで変更ファイルを検出し、各専門家が並列でレビューして 統合レポート（Markdown）を docs/reviews/ に出力する。 Use when: コードレビューしたい、変更をレビュー、レビューチーム、 チームレビュー、実装をチェック、品質チェック。 Triggers: "レビュー", "review", "コードレビュー", "code review", "チームレビュー", "team review", "変更をチェック", "品質チェック"

Multi-pass deep code review for large patches (1000+ LOC) that maximizes real bug detection. Orchestrates targeted-review, shallow-review, and deep-review in parallel across all HIGH and MEDIUM risk files and commits: understands the feature holistically, splits by file and commit, runs deep review on every HIGH/MEDIUM file, targeted review across the same scope, and per-commit shallow review, followed by cross-cut consistency checks. Use when: reviewing a large patch (feature branch, multi-commit, or single large diff, 1000+ LOC), doing a thorough pre-merge review, or when shallower reviews miss bugs due to patch size. Triggers on: "review this branch", "review these commits", "review this feature", "mega review", "thorough review", "full review of X commits", or when the user specifies a commit range or feature for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract customer reviews from any e-commerce product page or reviews page. Returns reviewer name, star rating, date, review title, review body, verified purchase status, and helpful votes per review. Works on Amazon, WooCommerce, Shopify, and any site with standard review markup. Supports pagination for multi-page review sections. Use when: product reviews, customer feedback, review scraping, get reviews, sentiment analysis data, review extraction, customer ratings, extract customer opinions, product feedback, user reviews, review mining, bulk review collection, review analysis, scrape ratings and comments, ecommerce review data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정, revisar artículo, revisión entre pares, revisión de manuscrito, informe de árbitro, revisa mi artículo, criticar artículo, simular revisión, revisión editorial, calibrar revisor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

修正完了後に agent-review-kit でレビューHTMLを生成し、ユーザーがブラウザで書いた差分コメントを Codex または Claude Code の同一セッションで受け取り、回答・修正・resolve を未解決0件まで繰り返すレビューループ。AIレビューの指摘を add-comment でブラウザ上のコメントとして表示し、ユーザーが返信した指摘だけ修正する「AIレビューモード」も含む。実装プラン・設計書などの任意HTMLを publish-html でレンダリング済みのまま表示し、要素クリック・テキスト範囲でコメントを受け取る「HTMLレビューモード」も含む。他のレビュースキルの結果の出力先として agent-review-kit が指定された場合も、このスキルを読んで AI レビューモードの手順に従うこと。Use when the user wants to review changes in a browser (GitHub-like diff review), review a rendered HTML doc (plan/design doc) in a browser, iterate on fixes with inline comments, or display AI review findings as browser comments (output target: agent-review-kit).

VS-Enhanced Literature Review Strategist - Comprehensive support for multiple review methodologies Full VS 5-Phase process: Prevents Mode Collapse and presents creative search strategies Supports: Systematic Review (PRISMA 2020), Scoping Review (JBI/PRISMA-ScR), Meta-Synthesis, Realist Synthesis, Narrative Review, Rapid Review Use when: conducting any type of literature review, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, finding prior research Triggers: literature review, PRISMA, systematic review, scoping review, meta-synthesis, realist synthesis, narrative review, rapid review

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce honest product reviews and buying guides without fabricated first-hand experience, using disclosed evidence tiers: verified specs, owner-experience synthesis at scale, expert triangulation, and hands-on only when true. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write product reviews or buying guides without hands-on access, set up a review methodology, add evidence disclosure to review content, align reviews with Google's reviews system or FTC affiliate disclosure expectations, or decide when Review and Product schema are honest to use. Triggers on product review, buying guide, best-of list, review methodology, evidence basis, hands-on testing, we tested, affiliate review site, review disclosure, methodology block, original research, reviews system. Also triggers when review content claims testing that did not happen, or when an affiliate site needs a trust mechanism that survives scrutiny.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a PR to an approved code review by looping OCR's multi-agent review and address steps. Runs /ocr:review then /ocr:address repeatedly until the review verdict is APPROVE, then one final /ocr:address for leftover suggestions, posting every review and every address round to the GitHub PR as comments. Use when the user asks to 'review and address in a loop', 'iterate review until approved', 'auto review-and-fix this PR', 'loop /ocr:review and /ocr:address', or to take a changeset all the way to a clean APPROVE with the default reviewer team. Wraps the /ocr:review (.ocr/commands/review.md) and /ocr:address (.ocr/commands/address.md) skills; needs a feature branch with an open GitHub PR and the gh CLI for posting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Claude Code Viewer (CCV): preview in-progress CCV changes on ccv-preview, register HTML artifacts, download files, or schedule jobs via CCV local API. Use when user asks for CCV preview, ccv-preview, browser visual QA, UI/UX validation, CCV artifacts, CCV file download, or CCV scheduler jobs. Treat preview/プレビュー as the CCV app preview service first; use artifacts only when the user explicitly asks for artifact/dashboard/report HTML. Do NOT use for generic web app previews outside CCV, production deployment, Cloudflare config, or Anthropic remote triggers.

This skill should be used when the user wants to "stress-test a design", "challenge an idea", "red team a proposal", "get critical feedback on a design", "validate a design", "adversarial architecture review", "risk assessment", "設計を検証して", "反論をもらいたい", "設計を批判的にレビュー", "デビルズアドボケート", "ストレステスト", "弱点を指摘して", "穴を見つけて", "この設計で良いか", "リスク評価", "設計のアーキテクチャレビュー", or mentions structured adversarial review of a proposal or design. NOTE: Use this for validating PROPOSALS and DESIGNS through adversarial debate, NOT for generic code review, PR review, or normal review requests (use /codex:review or /codex:adversarial-review for those). Also NOT for investigating unknown bugs (use /agent-dialectics:strong-inference for that).

共有のレビュー手順と補助スクリプトを使い、対象リポジトリ固有の要件も踏まえてコードを確認するスキル。OpenClawの共通インストールを参照します。

• 共通手順でコードをレビューしたいとき
• リポジトリ固有の要件も確認したいとき
• 共有レビュー手順をまとめて更新したいとき

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps and low-value tests by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Single-concern with a type argument, or full review with no argument. Use when the user asks to "review my code", "full code review", "review my changes", "check for bugs", "scan for bugs", "review correctness", "security audit", "find vulnerabilities", "review security", "check API usage", "verify against docs", "check for cross-file duplication", "review consistency", "check for code reuse", "review simplicity", "find untested code", "find redundant tests", or "review test coverage".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a GitHub Copilot (or any bot reviewer) pull-request review to a clean pass without babysitting it: fix each finding in its own commit, reply to the review thread with the fix sha, resolve the thread, re-request the bot, and poll for the async re-review. Covers the thread node-id (PRRT_...) vs comment databaseId distinction, the resolveReviewThread GraphQL mutation, the copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] slug, and how to read the bot's verdict (COMMENTED plus a "human review recommended" banner is not a blocking finding). Use when Copilot has left review comments on your PR, when bot review threads must be closed out with an auditable fix-reply-resolve trail before merge, or when you need to verify that a re-review actually landed on the new HEAD rather than the old one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simulate a Nature-style reviewer assessment from the referee perspective rather than an author rebuttal. Use when the user wants a pre-submission review, reviewer report, peer-review style critique, novelty/significance/technical soundness assessment, reviewer-style manuscript evaluation, 审稿人视角评估, 预审稿意见, or Nature reviewer report. Return 3 reviewer reports plus a cross-review synthesis, grounded only in the local Nature reviewer source basis. Also trigger on general pre-submission review requests during academic writing even without the word "Nature", such as getting a mock peer review for any journal, critiquing a draft as a reviewer would, assessing novelty/rigor before submission, and Chinese phrasings like 审稿人视角、模拟审稿、预审、帮我审一下论文、投稿前自审、审稿意见模拟、找论文问题.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

review-all を実行し、指摘内容をコードに反映、bun run c / bun run lint / bun test で自己検証し、CONVERGED/NOT_CONVERGED の収束判定付き完了レポートを /tmp/arima-review-fix-result.md に出力する。レビュー→修正→検証→レポートを一気通貫で行うスキル。スコープ引数は /review-all と同じ（wt / PR #N / vs:<branch> / range / ファイル列挙）。review-fix-loop からの自動呼び出し（mode=non-interactive）にも対応。Use when user says 'レビューして直して', 'review and fix', '自動修正', 'レビュー反映', or when invoked by review-fix-loop.

Provides comprehensive code review guidance for React 19, Vue 3, Angular 17+, Svelte 5, Rust, TypeScript, Java, Java 8, PHP, Ruby, Rails, Python, Django, FastAPI, Go, C#/.NET, Kotlin, Swift, Dart, Flutter, NestJS, C/C++, Zig, CSS/Less/Sass, Qt, and more. Covers architecture review, performance review, security audit, code quality anti-patterns, and common bugs across all ecosystems. Use when: reviewing pull requests, conducting PR reviews, code review, reviewing code changes, establishing review standards, mentoring developers, architecture reviews, security audits, performance reviews, checking code quality, finding bugs, giving feedback on code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor PR review comments and automatically classify and address reviewer feedback including code changes, questions, and nits. Use when handling PR reviews, addressing reviewer comments, responding to code review feedback, or automating review resolution. Triggers on handle reviews, PR review, address feedback, reviewer comments, code review, review response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。