「rhetoric」の検索結果

Persuasion and rhetorical analysis grounded in classical and modern frameworks. Covers Aristotle's three appeals (ethos, pathos, logos), rhetorical situation (audience, purpose, context), argument structure (Toulmin model), logical fallacies, persuasive writing, propaganda analysis, and ethical persuasion. Use when constructing arguments, analyzing rhetoric, evaluating persuasive messages, detecting fallacies, or studying the relationship between language and power.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze repeated non-engagement, deflection, motte-and-bailey shifts, tone policing, sealioning, and related manipulative discourse patterns. Use when the user suspects they are being rhetorically managed rather than answered, or when they need a careful pattern read grounded in quotes and alternatives. NOT for psychiatric diagnosis, legal judgment, or help deploying bad-faith tactics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build students' capacity to read historical documents closely — attending to word choice, tone, and rhetoric as evidence of perspective. Use when students summarise sources without analysing language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build students' capacity to read historical documents closely — attending to word choice, tone, and rhetoric as evidence of perspective. Use when students summarise sources without analysing language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse rhétorique et épistémologique d'articles, discours et textes argumentatifs. Utiliser ce skill quand l'utilisateur demande d'analyser la qualité argumentative d'un texte, d'identifier des sophismes ou biais, d'évaluer la fiabilité des sources citées, de déconstruire la logique d'un raisonnement, ou de produire une réécriture critique structurée d'un document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Put your AI on a Performance Improvement Plan. Forces exhaustive problem-solving with Western big-tech performance culture rhetoric and structured debugging. Trigger when: (1) task failed 2+ times or stuck tweaking same approach; (2) about to say 'I cannot', suggest manual work, or blame environment without verifying; (3) being passive—not searching, not reading source, just waiting; (4) user frustration: 'try harder', 'stop giving up', 'figure it out', 'again???', or similar. Also for complex debugging, env issues, config/deployment failures. All task types: code, config, research, writing, deployment, infra, API. Do NOT trigger on first-attempt failures or when a known fix is executing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strip AI writing patterns from text. Checks 24 patterns across 4 categories (structural, lexical, rhetorical, formatting) with academic economics adaptation. This skill should be used on any text that reads too "AI-generated", or as a final pass on drafted sections. Triggers on "humanize", "de-AI", "make it sound natural", or "strip AI patterns".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and compile beautiful Beamer presentations following the Rhetoric of Decks philosophy. Use when making slides, creating decks, or compiling .tex presentation files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic audit and review by Referee 2. Two modes — "deck" reviews slide presentations for rhetoric, visual quality, and compile cleanliness; "code" performs cross-language replication and econometric audit of empirical pipelines. Use when reviewing slides, auditing code, or verifying replication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-hoc verification and trust audit of AI-generated factual and interpretive claims. Classifies claims by type and salience, routes them to domain-appropriate sources, scores trustworthiness on a tiered scale with an Interpolated verdict for plausible-but-unsupported detail, and assesses rhetorical fairness on interpretive claims. Designed for clinical-negligence and healthcare-law practice in England and Wales, with general applicability beyond.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply elite legal writing techniques drawn from Justice Kagan, Boies & Olson, and other top advocates to any legal document — briefs, submissions, letters, opinions, memos, or persuasive correspondence. This skill covers both prose craft (clarity, examples, parallel construction, voice, quoting) and architectural strategy (argument sequencing, framing, openings, endings). Use this skill whenever the user asks you to draft, edit, or improve legal writing and wants it to be genuinely persuasive — not just correct. Also trigger when the user mentions 'make it more persuasive', 'sharpen this', 'strengthen the argument', 'rewrite this section', 'punch it up', 'legal writing', 'draft a brief', 'draft a submission', 'write like a top advocate', or asks you to improve the rhetoric, flow, or force of any legal document. This skill complements the larissa-legal-voice skill (which handles tone and personal voice) by adding the persuasive technique layer on top.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Act as experienced opposing counsel to attack, undermine, and expose weaknesses in a legal argument, submission, witness statement, or structured reasoning. Produces a six-part adversarial analysis: 1. A core theory of attack identifying the single most effective way to defeat the argument; 2. A reconstructed version of the opposing argument stripped of rhetoric to expose its fragility; 3. Primary lines of attack grouped by category (legal misstatement, evidential gaps, causation failures, internal inconsistency, over-reliance on assertion, procedural weakness); 4. An "if I were the judge" section showing how a sceptical tribunal would dismantle the argument; 5. Surgical strikes - 3 to 5 high-impact points ready for oral submissions; and 6. An analysis of what the argument is trying to hide. Written in formal, adversarial British English for a legally trained audience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when switching AI persona/language style. Syncs 13+ character profiles (Ding Yuanying, Lin Daiyu, Lu Xun, Li Yunlong, etc.) from GitHub, generates persona prompts with thinking patterns, rhetoric, and speech traits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from prose, and keep it out of a repo. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to make it sound natural and human, or when auditing a whole docs folder for AI slop. Detects 41 patterns across content, language, style, communication, filler, and rhetoric, including: significance inflation, promotional language, -ing tails, vague attributions, AI vocabulary, copula avoidance, negative parallelisms, false agency, em dash overuse, chatbot artifacts, hedging stacks, staccato drama, and aphorism formulas. Includes voice calibration, a no-fabrication rule, statistical tells, and a draft -> audit -> final rewrite loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the frameworks of Aristotle (ancient Greek philosopher, logic, ethics, metaphysics, 384-322 BCE) to decision-making, ethics, and analysis. Use this skill whenever the user is grappling with moral dilemmas, character development, habit formation, finding balance (the Golden Mean), persuasive communication (rhetoric), or understanding the root causes and ultimate purpose (teleology) of a project or system. Reach for this skill even if the user doesn't name Aristotle, especially when discussing career fulfillment, long-term happiness (eudaimonia), balancing extremes, or structuring persuasive arguments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to apply the analytical lens of Judith Butler (American philosopher, gender theory, Gender Trouble). Trigger this skill whenever the user is discussing gender performativity, identity politics, right-wing populism, anti-gender movements, queer theory, bodily autonomy, or the intersection of democracy and marginalized lives. Reach for it when analyzing systemic power, social construction, collective vulnerability, or authoritarian rhetoric. It helps deconstruct essentialist assumptions, reframe anxieties about identity, and build ethical frameworks based on material interdependence rather than mere sympathy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Catalog of informal fallacies with definitions, canonical examples, and detection heuristics. Covers relevance fallacies (ad hominem, straw man, red herring, appeal to authority, appeal to emotion), presumption fallacies (false dichotomy, complex question, begging the question), ambiguity fallacies (equivocation, amphiboly, accent), causal fallacies (post hoc, slippery slope, correlation-causation), and statistical fallacies (hasty generalization, cherry-picking). Use when evaluating arguments for rhetorical or informal reasoning errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Practical argument analysis and construction -- how to identify, evaluate, reconstruct, and build real arguments in natural language. Covers argument identification (premises, conclusions, intermediate steps), charity and steel-manning, argument mapping, the distinction between deductive validity and inductive strength, burden of proof, and the rhetorical context in which arguments operate. Use when the goal is to engage with real-world argument rather than to formalize it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Media literacy and critical analysis of media messages across platforms and formats. Covers media ecology (McLuhan), encoding/decoding (Hall), news literacy, digital media analysis, propaganda techniques, algorithmic curation, visual rhetoric, and ethical media consumption. Use when analyzing media messages, evaluating news sources, understanding how media technology shapes communication, detecting propaganda, or studying the relationship between medium and message.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Construct well-structured arguments using the hypothesis-argument-example triad. Covers formulating falsifiable hypotheses, building logical arguments (deductive, inductive, analogical, evidential), providing concrete examples, and steelmanning counterarguments. Use when writing or reviewing PR descriptions that propose technical changes, justifying design decisions in ADRs, constructing substantive code review feedback, or building a research argument or technical proposal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

《辩论筑基》体系辩论审问——引导出论与攻防处理。基于 grill-me 审问模式，完整内置《辩论筑基》(Debate Universal Grammar) 全套体系。自包含，不需另行学习。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Language-agnostic writing style guidelines covering structure, tone, rhetorical constraints, banned phrases, and review checks. Use when writing any kind of content in any language. Including blog posts, notes, technical articles, technical writing, chitchat, social media posts, etc., even when you are just sending a text message. Also use when reviewing or editing existing content for tone and style compliance. For Traditional Chinese (zh-TW) content, apply `chinese-content-writing-guideline` alongside this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Language-specific guidelines for producing high-quality Traditional Chinese (zh-TW) content: script, full-width punctuation, spacing, forms of address, grammar constraints, and Taiwan terminology. Includes the no-calque rule against literal translations of English phrasal verbs such as 折入 for fold in. Use when writing any kind of Chinese content. Including blog posts, notes, technical articles, technical writing, chitchat, social media posts, etc., even when you are just sending a text message. Also use when reviewing or editing existing Chinese content for language and terminology compliance. Always apply `writing-style-guideline` alongside this skill for structure, tone, rhetorical constraints, and banned phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Communications Teacher, Postsecondary — designing or norming a multi-section basic public-speaking course, resolving a cross-rater grading discrepancy on a speech rubric, screening for and accommodating communication apprehension, or choosing a rhetorical-criticism method for a media-analysis assignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。