「rsa」の検索結果

Collects every tweet in an X (Twitter) conversation thread given a conversation id (root tweet id) — the focal tweet plus all replies, sub-replies, and quote chains — and returns normalized per-tweet data with text, author, engagement counts, media, hashtags, mentions, in_reply_to mapping, and cursor for pagination. Use when user mentions Twitter conversation, X conversation thread, conversation_id, thread scraper, scrape Twitter replies, all replies to a tweet, replies under a tweet, sub-replies, nested replies, thread harvester, get replies of a tweet, scrape comments on Twitter, scrape comments on X, full thread extraction, conversation export, conversation tree, reply chain, thread dump, X tweet thread, twitter thread scrape, comment scraping twitter, comment scraping x, focal tweet plus context, root tweet plus replies. Also applies to sentiment analysis on a single viral tweet, controversy mapping, harvesting community Q&A threads, capturing AMA threads, recovering long-running discussions, and any paginated bulk reply collection driven by a conversation id.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user wants to "stress-test a design", "challenge an idea", "red team a proposal", "get critical feedback on a design", "validate a design", "adversarial architecture review", "risk assessment", "設計を検証して", "反論をもらいたい", "設計を批判的にレビュー", "デビルズアドボケート", "ストレステスト", "弱点を指摘して", "穴を見つけて", "この設計で良いか", "リスク評価", "設計のアーキテクチャレビュー", or mentions structured adversarial review of a proposal or design. NOTE: Use this for validating PROPOSALS and DESIGNS through adversarial debate, NOT for generic code review, PR review, or normal review requests (use /codex:review or /codex:adversarial-review for those). Also NOT for investigating unknown bugs (use /agent-dialectics:strong-inference for that).

End-to-end Coval adversarial / red-team testing workflow. Builds one adversarial test set (12 core attack vectors plus legitimate controls, each with an expected-behavior checklist), creates a persistent "Adversarial User" persona and a Composite Evaluation metric that scores each scenario against its own expected behaviors, launches a multi-iteration run against the agent (voice or chat), polls for completion, builds a per-scenario pass/fail scorecard, and creates a saved report grouped by Test Case. Use when a user wants to follow the Adversarial & Red-Team Testing cookbook (https://docs.coval.dev/guides/adversarial-red-team-testing) without doing each step by hand. Triggers: "adversarial test set", "red team my agent", "jailbreak / prompt-injection testing", "test my agent against bad actors".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Import AI-assistant chat exports (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity) and agent session transcripts into the brain as one dated page per conversation under conversations/, validate each page against the native conversation parser, extract facts via the native conversation-facts flow, and keep the archive gap-free with a detect-and-backfill loop. Then answer archive questions: "when did I first discuss X", trace how an idea evolved across past conversations, pull a specific thread.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft, confirm, and post a single conversational reply to GitHub PR conversation comments (issue comments). The reply addresses all tracked items in one natural-prose message. Use when the user asks to "reply to PR conversation", "post PR conversation replies", or "draft PR conversation messages".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conversation patterns and interaction protocols for multi-agent systems. Covers request/response, pub/sub, blackboard, delegation chains, debate, critique, consensus, fan-out/fan-in, supervisor-worker, and peer negotiation. Deep analysis of AutoGen conversation patterns, CrewAI delegation, LangGraph state passing, and FIPA-ACL performatives. Teaches how to design what agents say to each other and in what order. Activate on: "agent conversation", "agent protocol", "multi-agent debate", "agent delegation", "supervisor worker pattern", "agent voting", "consensus protocol", "fan-out fan-in", "agent negotiation", "blackboard pattern", "agent dialogue", "conversation topology", "agent handoff". NOT for: wire format or serialization (use agent-interchange-formats), orchestration infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026), single agent behavior (use agentic-patterns).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement Conversational Language Understanding (CLU) using the azure-ai-language-conversations Python SDK. Use when working with ConversationAnalysisClient to analyze conversation intent and entities, building NLP features, or integrating language understanding into applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, run, and measure an adversary engagement operation using the MITRE Engage framework so that deployed deception is driven by strategy instead of deployed ad hoc. Covers the Engage Matrix (Prepare, Expose, Affect, Elicit, Understand), the 10-Step Operational Process, mapping engagement Activities to the ATT&CK techniques they expose, and defining measurable Goals and Operational Objectives. Use when a team has honeypots, honeytokens, or canary tokens but no coordinating strategy, when leadership asks "should we engage attackers and how", when building a deception/denial program, when writing an adversary engagement operation plan, or when deciding which deception Activities to deploy against a specific threat actor. Keywords: MITRE Engage, adversary engagement, cyber deception strategy, denial and deception, Engage Matrix, EAC, EGO, Expose Affect Elicit, deception program, honeypot strategy, engagement operation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Technical proposal facing adversarial scrutiny: independent perspectives attack a proposal, then distill into a bundle a separate planner consumes. Use when the user says: adversarial-consensus, adversarial planning, adversarial plan review, red team this plan, red-team this plan, red team the proposal, multi-perspective review, multiple perspectives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement Conversational Language Understanding (CLU) using the azure-ai-language-conversations Python SDK. Use when working with ConversationAnalysisClient to analyze conversation intent and entities, building NLP features, or integrating language understanding into applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference for paired-reversal handling on GL batch tapes: an RV row whose ref-trace points at an earlier row cancels BOTH legs (the RV and the row it references) — but ONLY when the two value-dates fall within the shop's reversal settlement window; an RV that references a too-old posting is NOT a cancellation and posts one-sided. Useful when the posting tape carries a reference-trace column alongside reversal codes and the running balance is off by twice the reversal magnitude, or by a whole leg on stale references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect path traversal vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find file-loading sinks with dynamic paths), batched verify (trace user input and mitigations in parallel subagents, 3 sinks each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/pathtraversal-results.md. Use when asked to find path traversal, directory traversal, or file disclosure bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing conversational flows for website chatbots and AI agents. Intent recognition architecture, branching logic, fallback handling, escalation to human, conversation analytics. Honest about scripted-bot (rigid trees, fail edge cases), hallucinating-bot (LLM without structure, makes things up), and structured-guided-conversation (LLM-powered with intent architecture and fallback discipline) patterns. Distinguishes chatbot DESIGN (this skill) from chatbot IMPLEMENTATION (engineering and platform work). Triggers on chatbot, conversational AI, AI agent, chat widget, intent design, conversational flow, bot escalation, LLM grounding. Also triggers when a chatbot is hallucinating, when a scripted bot is failing edge cases, or when a chatbot is being scoped for the first time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when reasoning about generative AI, adversarial machine learning, neural network security, algorithmic fairness, or deep learning fundamentals. This skill channels the thinking of Ian Goodfellow, inventor of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). Trigger this skill when the user asks about model robustness, mitigating bias, evaluating AI guardrails, designing generative models, or defending against adversarial attacks. Apply his frameworks of minimax games, adversarial feature learning, and worst-case robustness analysis to shift the user's perspective from average-case optimization to adversarial resilience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when reasoning about generative AI, adversarial machine learning, neural network security, algorithmic fairness, or deep learning fundamentals. This skill channels the thinking of Ian Goodfellow, inventor of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). Trigger this skill when the user asks about model robustness, mitigating bias, evaluating AI guardrails, designing generative models, or defending against adversarial attacks. Apply his frameworks of minimax games, adversarial feature learning, and worst-case robustness analysis to shift the user's perspective from average-case optimization to adversarial resilience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes comprehensive red team exercises that simulate real-world adversary operations against an organization's people, processes, and technology. The red team operates with stealth as a primary objective, employing the full attack lifecycle from initial reconnaissance through objective completion while testing the organization's detection and response capabilities. This differs from penetration testing by focusing on adversary emulation rather than vulnerability identification. Activates for requests involving red team exercise, adversary simulation, adversary emulation, or full-scope offensive security assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

N-round adversarial review pipeline for empirical research output — the chain from data to LaTeX tables to a manuscript that cites them. A Claude drafter proposes minimal diffs, a deterministic mechanical battery gates every diff from a clean state with a regression gate, a Codex reviewer files check-backed critiques, and a blind judge panel decides residual disputes. Manual-invoke ONLY: trigger when the user explicitly runs /adversarial-empirical-review or names 'adversarial-empirical-review' / 'adversarial empirical review'. Do NOT auto-trigger on generic 'review my results', 'check my tables', or manuscript-editing requests. For prose-style refinement use style-emulation instead; this skill AUDITS WHETHER THE TABLES ARE CORRECT — that each number in the tables is what the analysis code computes, reproduces from the data, and is internally consistent. It is an empirical + code review: the manuscript is read only to resolve table numbering, and prose is not examined.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement AI chatbot analytics and conversation monitoring. Use when adding conversation metrics, tracking AI usage, measuring user engagement with chat, or building conversation dashboards. Activates for AI analytics, token tracking, conversation categorization, and chat performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement Conversational Language Understanding (CLU) using the azure-ai-language-conversations Python SDK. Use when working with ConversationAnalysisClient to analyze conversation intent and entities, building NLP features, or integrating language understanding into applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, run, and measure an adversary engagement operation using the MITRE Engage framework so that deployed deception is driven by strategy instead of deployed ad hoc. Covers the Engage Matrix (Prepare, Expose, Affect, Elicit, Understand), the 10-Step Operational Process, mapping engagement Activities to the ATT&CK techniques they expose, and defining measurable Goals and Operational Objectives. Use when a team has honeypots, honeytokens, or canary tokens but no coordinating strategy, when leadership asks "should we engage attackers and how", when building a deception/denial program, when writing an adversary engagement operation plan, or when deciding which deception Activities to deploy against a specific threat actor. Keywords: MITRE Engage, adversary engagement, cyber deception strategy, denial and deception, Engage Matrix, EAC, EGO, Expose Affect Elicit, deception program, honeypot strategy, engagement operation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes comprehensive red team exercises that simulate real-world adversary operations against an organization's people, processes, and technology. The red team operates with stealth as a primary objective, employing the full attack lifecycle from initial reconnaissance through objective completion while testing the organization's detection and response capabilities. This differs from penetration testing by focusing on adversary emulation rather than vulnerability identification. Activates for requests involving red team exercise, adversary simulation, adversary emulation, or full-scope offensive security assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement AI chatbot analytics and conversation monitoring. Use when adding conversation metrics, tracking AI usage, measuring user engagement with chat, or building conversation dashboards. Activates for AI analytics, token tracking, conversation categorization, and chat performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

指定した会話と期間で共有されたOpenClawの変更提案や課題を集め、GitHubで状態と根拠を確認し、影響度と対応準備に応じて優先順位を付けるスキル。

• 先週の会話で共有されたPRの整理
• 掲載済み提案の状態を再確認したいとき
• 同じ期間から未掲載の提案を探す

macOSのMessages.appを通じて、iMessageやSMSの会話履歴と新着を確認します。送信先と本文を確認したうえで、文章や添付ファイルを送るスキルです。

• 最近のメッセージ一覧を確認したいとき
• 会話履歴を読み返したいとき
• 確認後に文章や添付ファイルを送るとき