15 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Anthropic's method for training harmless AI through self-improvement. Two-phase approach - supervised learning with self-critique/revision, then RLAIF (RL from AI Feedback). Use for safety alignment, reducing harmful outputs without human labels. Powers Claude's safety system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Anthropic's method for training harmless AI through self-improvement. Two-phase approach - supervised learning with self-critique/revision, then RLAIF (RL from AI Feedback). Use for safety alignment, reducing harmful outputs without human labels. Powers Claude's safety system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs. Use this skill when: - Implementing self-critique and reflection loops - Building evaluator-optimizer pipelines for quality-critical generation - Creating test-driven code refinement workflows - Designing rubric-based or LLM-as-judge evaluation systems - Adding iterative improvement to agent outputs (code, reports, analysis) - Measuring and improving agent response quality
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Launch an intelligent sub-agent with automatic model selection based on task complexity, specialized agent matching, Zero-shot CoT reasoning, and mandatory self-critique verification
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs. Use this skill when: - Implementing self-critique and reflection loops - Building evaluator-optimizer pipelines for quality-critical generation - Creating test-driven code refinement workflows - Designing rubric-based or LLM-as-judge evaluation systems - Adding iterative improvement to agent outputs (code, reports, analysis) - Measuring and improving agent response quality
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Direct, build and render premium cinematic motion design from code — launch films, product and feature videos, looping feature animations for landing pages and social, logo stings and reveals, UI walkthroughs, app demos, kinetic type, teasers, trailers, intros and promo clips. Use this whenever the user wants any video, animation, motion graphic or animated demo made with Remotion, HyperFrames, HTML/GSAP or React, or asks to storyboard, time, score, render, polish or critique one — even if they only say "make a video about X", "animate this feature" or "we need a launch clip". It supplies concept and copy discipline, type and colour taste that defers to a supplied brand, a beat-locked timeline that drives both picture and a synthesized soundtrack, choreography and transition craft, real product UI in motion, film-grade finishing (true motion blur, no banding, BT.709, sync-checked mux) and a measured self-critique loop on contact sheets and renders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a literature review, academic deep dive, research report, state-of-the-art survey, topic scoping, comparative analysis of methods/papers, grant background, or any request that needs multi-source scholarly evidence with citations. Also trigger proactively when a user question clearly requires academic grounding (e.g. "what's known about X", "compare approach A vs B in the literature", "summarize the field of Y"). Runs an 8-phase (Phase 0..7), script-driven research workflow across 7 federated sources (OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, PubMed, DBLP, bioRxiv, Exa) with optional Semantic Scholar / Brave MCP enrichment, with deduplication, transparent ranking, dual-backend citation chasing (OpenAlex + Semantic Scholar), self-critique, and structured report output with verifiable citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for self-correcting implementation. Implements the reflexion loop: implement, validate, self-critique, retry (max 3 iterations).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Self-critique specification documents using extended thinking — surfaces hidden assumptions, contradictions, missing edge cases, and scope creep before implementation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fierce autonomous internal co-founder. Bounded web research for evidence-backed improvements. Structured idea formulation with self-critique filter that rejects ideas not serving the goal. Auto-implements high-confidence aligned improvements, proposes medium-confidence ideas for approval. Evaluates viral coefficient, AI search visibility (GEO), and solo SaaS economics. Considers higher pursuits: employing disabled people, spiritual tech investigation, 99% wealth donation ethos.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Método da Anthropic para treinar IA inofensiva através de auto-aprimoramento. Abordagem em duas fases - aprendizado supervisionado com auto-crítica/revisão, depois RLAIF (RL from AI Feedback). Use para alinhamento de segurança, redução de outputs prejudiciais sem rótulos humanos. Alimenta o sistema de segurança do Claude.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
two-stage review (spec compliance first, then code quality), refactoring, and quality improvement. Use when reviewing code, eliminating code smells, reducing technical debt, refactoring methods, running self-critique loops, or improving maintainability and readability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate and improve AI-generated output with explicit rubrics, reflection loops, and stop conditions. Use when building self-critique workflows, evaluator-optimizer pipelines, or acceptance gates for code, docs, analysis, or plans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Frontend design blueprints with craftsmanship scoring, self-critique loops, and engineering handoff. Aesthetic intelligence against AI homogeneity. Use for: UI/UX design specs, design system creation, visual direction exploration, component design review, design-to-engineering handoff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs. Use this skill when: - Implementing self-critique and reflection loops - Building evaluator-optimizer pipelines for quality-critical generation - Creating test-driven code refinement workflows - Designing rubric-based or LLM-as-judge evaluation systems - Adding iterative improvement to agent outputs (code, reports, analysis) - Measuring and improving agent response quality
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。