12 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
For use only in threads for this proactive personal assistant. Investigate software issues; inspect, write, review, or test code; work on a repository or local engineering file; or create, fix, or monitor a pull request or CI run. Use for actual engineering or product QA work, not a general programming explanation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover available task environments and create or continue tasks when the user names an environment or computer, or refers to files or apps specifically on their computer. Excludes software engineering; use orbit:software-engineering for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Your software-engineering brain trust. Named personas across 11 cells covering cloud architecture, reliability/SRE/observability, data and storage, security, FinOps, languages and runtimes, systems programming, web and frontend…
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes substantive ML, AI, data, scientific-computing, and software-engineering requests to the smallest useful set of managed repository skills. Invoke proactively when a request names or implies a package, framework, model family, dataset, modality, workflow, backend, deployment target, evaluation method, or implementation approach that may benefit from repository guidance, even if no repository is named. Narrow progressively from area to family to repository root: inspect only the one or two most likely area pages; compare candidates by capability, task surface, model/data format, training versus inference versus evaluation intent, runtime constraints, and root-skill description; then open only the selected root and relevant sub-skills, references, or scripts. Select multiple repositories only when each adds a distinct capability. Do not load the whole collection, treat dependencies or incidental integrations as capabilities, choose by name alone, or force a match when no exact taxonomy family applies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized software engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when building prompts for system design, code review, incident response, security analysis, API design, architecture decisions, RFCs, ADRs, runbooks, or technical leadership. Trigger on: "build a prompt for code review," "system design prompt," "SRE prompt," "security review prompt," "incident response prompt," "API design prompt," "architecture decision prompt," "RFC prompt," "runbook prompt." Provides 11 tested approaches across identity, reasoning, and output for engineering analysis. Do NOT use for general coding help, writing code, or debugging — this builds prompts that shape engineering analysis, not code itself. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the Expanded Guidance for NASA Systems Engineering (NASA/SP-2016-6105-SUPPL, Volume 1, March 2016) — the practitioner-depth supplement to the NASA SE Handbook. Use for the load-bearing mechanics the handbook compresses: the SE Engine's per-phase cadence and the iterative-vs-recursive distinction, the AS9100 crosswalk, life-cycle tailoring vs. customization and the Compliance Matrix, the recursive system-design consistency loop (ConOps vs. Operations Concept, requirement flow/type/ownership, successive refinement), product realization (verify/qualify/accept/certify cardinality, protoflight, 'test the way we fly' coverage, two-form transition), and the crosscutting technical-management procedures (six-step scheduling, cost-estimating method selection, JCL, interface document family, RIDM/CRM, CM baselines, EVM arithmetic, MOE/MOP/KPP/TPM, the three required leading indicators, and the decision-analysis method catalog). This is the DEPTH layer — it deliberately does NOT restate the base definitions; pair it with the nasa-se-handbook pack. Scope: NASA space-flight SE practice (Vol 1 Practices); thin on the Vol 2 process-appendix detail, on non-NASA/commercial life cycles, and on software-engineering methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7150.2D — NASA Software Engineering Requirements. Use for NASA's Agency-wide software-engineering requirements: the software classification scheme (Classes A–F), the Requirements Mapping Matrix and class-driven applicability, tailoring and Technical Authority governance, the SWE-### 'shall' requirements across software management (Ch 3) and the engineering life cycle (Ch 4), the supporting disciplines (configuration management, risk, peer reviews/inspections, measurement, non-conformance — Ch 5), safety-critical and cybersecurity requirements, IV&V applicability, traceability, and the Appendix A definitions. Does not cover detailed software-assurance/safety procedures (see NASA-STD-8739.8), implementation how-to and document content (see NASA-HDBK-2203), the systems-engineering process framework (see NPR 7123.1), or program/project management (see NPR 7120.5).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Database Architect IA — Expert en conception de bases de données (PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Redis, schema design, migrations). Optimise le stockage et l'accès aux données.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Data Engineer IA — Expert en pipelines de données (ETL, data lakes, dbt, Airflow, streaming). Construit des pipelines fiables, scalables et auditable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cloud Engineer IA — Expert en infrastructure cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure, Terraform, K8s, serverless). Conçoit et déploie des architectures cloud natives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
API Designer IA — Expert en conception d'APIs (REST, GraphQL, gRPC, OpenAPI, versioning, rate limiting). Crée des APIs intuitives, évolutives et sécurisées.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Accessibility Engineer IA — Expert en accessibilité (WCAG 2.1, screen readers, ARIA, keyboard nav). Rend les applications utilisables par tous.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。