1,506 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generate MATLAB Grader assessment item sets. Use when the user asks to create MATLAB Grader assessment items, generate MATLAB assessment materials, build MATLAB homework assessment items, QTI 3 portable assessment items, or mentions "grader assessment items". Produces complete assessment item folders with description, solution, template, tests, Function call blocks, and optional QTI 3 interchange files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) advisor for the automotive supply chain — the ENX/VDA assessment regime that OEMs like VW, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz require from suppliers and service providers. Covers the VDA ISA 6 catalogue (current through 2026) and the ISA2027 transition (published July 1, 2026; mandatory for assessments ordered from January 1, 2027), assessment levels AL1/AL2/AL3, all 12 assessment objectives/labels (Confidential, Strictly Confidential, High/Very High Availability, Proto Parts/Vehicles, Test Vehicles, Proto Events, Data, Special Data), maturity scoring (0–5, target 3, cutback rules), the ENX portal process, scoping, audit-provider selection, corrective action plans and the 9-month window, 3-year label validity, and ISO 27001 mapping. Use for any TISAX, VDA ISA, ENX, automotive information-security assessment, prototype protection, or OEM supplier-security requirement question — gap assessments, label selection, readiness, and audit prep.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes between five assessment pathways — formative, rubric/criteria, authentic/performance, peer/self, and diagnostic — with validity and equity checks. Use when a teacher needs help choosing how to assess.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides the post-Schrems II Transfer Impact Assessment process following EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 six-step methodology. Covers destination country surveillance law assessment, European Essential Guarantees evaluation, and supplementary measures determination. Keywords: TIA, transfer impact assessment, Schrems II, EDPB recommendations, supplementary measures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides combined DPIA and AI Act conformity assessment template with integrated risk scoring matrix. Covers GDPR Art. 35 DPIA elements, AI Act high-risk system requirements, mitigation measures, and human oversight assessment. Keywords: DPIA template, conformity assessment, risk scoring, AI Act, combined assessment, high-risk AI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes between five assessment pathways — formative, rubric/criteria, authentic/performance, peer/self, and diagnostic — with validity and equity checks. Use when a teacher needs help choosing how to assess.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk register. Use when an organization needs an actual risk *assessment* (not a maturity score), when a control framework (CSF, ISO 27001, RMF, SOC 2, PCI) requires a documented risk analysis as input, when leadership asks "what are our top risks and how bad are they", when assessing risk for a new system or major change, or when building a risk register from scratch. This is the methodology that feeds framework selection, ATO packages, and treatment decisions. Keywords: risk assessment, NIST 800-30, threat modeling, likelihood and impact, risk register, risk analysis, threat sources, vulnerabilities, risk determination, qualitative risk, risk matrix, residual risk, risk treatment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design an adaptive assessment loop where each student response triggers the next instructional move. Use when building technology-enhanced formative assessment cycles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides comprehensive controller self-assessment covering GDPR Articles 5-49 with scoring methodology and reporting format. Activate when conducting internal reviews or benchmarking maturity. Keywords: self-assessment, controller assessment, compliance questionnaire, scoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Determines whether a personal data breach triggers notification obligations under GDPR Articles 33 and 34 using structured risk assessment methodology. Covers breach type classification (CIA triad), data sensitivity scoring, volume assessment, identifiability analysis, and consequence severity evaluation. References EDPB Guidelines 01/2021 with 18 breach scenarios. Keywords: breach risk assessment, GDPR, Article 33, Article 34, EDPB, notification threshold.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides privacy audit risk assessment including risk universe development, inherent and residual risk scoring, control effectiveness evaluation, risk-based audit planning, heat map generation, risk appetite alignment, and audit prioritization by risk exposure. Covers the full audit risk assessment cycle from scoping through ongoing monitoring. Keywords: audit risk assessment, risk universe, inherent risk, residual risk, control effectiveness, risk-based audit planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design an adaptive assessment loop where each student response triggers the next instructional move. Use when building technology-enhanced formative assessment cycles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk register. Use when an organization needs an actual risk *assessment* (not a maturity score), when a control framework (CSF, ISO 27001, RMF, SOC 2, PCI) requires a documented risk analysis as input, when leadership asks "what are our top risks and how bad are they", when assessing risk for a new system or major change, or when building a risk register from scratch. This is the methodology that feeds framework selection, ATO packages, and treatment decisions. Keywords: risk assessment, NIST 800-30, threat modeling, likelihood and impact, risk register, risk analysis, threat sources, vulnerabilities, risk determination, qualitative risk, risk matrix, residual risk, risk treatment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent fallback for CCSPlayer_MovementServices_ProcessMovement (auto-generated, category: func). Locate CCSPlayer_MovementServices::ProcessMovement in the CS2 server module via IDA Pro MCP and emit a fresh, minimal-unique artifact. The deterministic preprocessor could not resolve this symbol on the current gamever - your job is the re-sign. Trigger: CCSPlayer_MovementServices_ProcessMovement, CCSPlayer_MovementServices::ProcessMovement
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Supports multivariate severity assessment and exploratory endpoint-time score forecasting for laboratory animal studies using the RELSA (RELative Severity Assessment) score and ARIMA-based foRcast forecasting. Use when combining welfare readouts — body weight or weight loss, body temperature, clinical or nesting scores, biomarkers, activity, heart rate, burrowing, wheel running — into one severity score per animal per day, when asking which animals are at risk of reaching a humane endpoint at a specified future observation time, when defining attention/danger zones or thresholds on a severity scale by kernel density estimation, or when reporting severity for a 3Rs, refinement, animal-welfare, or EU Directive 2010/63/EU severity-assessment context. Covers directionality ("turned" variables), baseline normalization, reference sets, RELSA weights, ARIMA prediction intervals, and RMSE/PICP/MPIW evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an AI impact assessment — structured intake, risk analysis, regulatory classification per regime in scope, policy consistency diff, and recommendation with conditions. Uses the house-style structure learned from the seed impact assessment in `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/ai-governance-legal/CLAUDE.md`. Use when user says "impact assessment for", "assess this AI use case", "run an AIA", "generate an AIA", "we need to document this AI system", "AI risk assessment for X", or follows a conditional triage result.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs and interprets AWS Resilience Hub v2 failure mode assessments. Covers starting assessments, understanding findings (severity, categories, recommendations), triaging by achievability, working with AI-generated service functions, and resolving findings. Applies when the user wants to run an assessment, review findings, or understand failure modes, or has a specific finding and asks how to resolve, remediate, or fix it. Does not apply to initial setup (use resilience-hub-getting-started) or FIS experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designing quizzes, personality assessments, and recommendation tools that segment users into actionable categories rather than generating clicks for clicks' sake. Question architecture, scoring algorithms, result categorization, recommendation mapping, lead capture integration. Honest about clickbait-quiz (engagement only), vanity-result (entertaining, not useful), and actionable-segmentation (genuine categorization that drives next-step recommendations) patterns. Triggers on quiz, assessment, personality test, recommendation tool, scorecard, diagnostic, fit evaluator, what-type-of-X-are-you, persona quiz. Also triggers when an audience needs a categorization-driven lead magnet, when a vanity quiz is producing engagement but no qualified leads, or when an assessment is being scoped for the first time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GDPR Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) — Guided assessment for Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the EDPB three-step test. Based on EDPB Guidelines 1/2024, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI models), the OSS Case Digest on Legitimate Interest (McIntyre 2026), CNIL AI guidance (June 2025), ICO guidance, and key CJEU case law. Use when: (1) user needs to assess whether legitimate interest is appropriate, (2) user asks about Art. 6(1)(f), "Interessenabwägung", "berechtigtes Interesse", "balancing test", or "LIA", (3) user wants to document a legitimate interest assessment, (4) user mentions the three-step test, (5) user evaluates necessity or proportionality under Art. 6(1)(f), (6) user discusses direct marketing, fraud prevention, IT security, employee monitoring, AI training, web scraping, or credit checks in context of legal basis, (7) user handles a right to object (Art. 21), (8) user asks about children's data, profiling, or cross-border data sharing under legitimate interest, (9) user compares legitimate interest against other legal bases. Do NOT use for: consent assessments (Art. 6(1)(a)), contract performance (Art. 6(1)(b)), DPIA workflows, or pure ePrivacy/cookie compliance questions — though the skill does address the ePrivacy/GDPR overlap where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fast 15-25 minute triage for preliminary EU AI Act classification and compliance assessment. This skill should be used when the user asks to "do a quick AI Act assessment", "check if the AI Act applies to us", "run a preliminary classification", "do an AI Act triage", "quick check", "preliminary assessment", "Schnellprüfung", "Ersteinschätzung", or needs a fast initial assessment before committing to full analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a single-point rubric with one criterion and open columns for evidence. Use for student self-assessment, peer feedback, teacher formative feedback, or pre-task planning. Works with any learning target, with or without a band system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design formative assessments that make students' historical thinking visible — revealing whether they source, close-read, contextualise, and corroborate. Use when assessing historical thinking skills or planning a diagnostic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a proposed assessment for construct validity, reliability, and alignment to learning objectives. Use when reviewing or quality-assuring assessments before deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。