「threat」の検索結果

[omh] Attack paths into an operated system: turn a system's components and data flows into assets, trust boundaries, attack scenarios, controls, and the security test that proves each control holds. Use when the user says: application-threat-model, application threat model, threat model, threat modeling, threat modelling, threat modeling session, threat modeling workshop, security threat model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a threat model document. Use when the user says "threat model", "threat modeling", "STRIDE analysis", "attack surface analysis", "security design review", "what are the threats to this system", "adversarial analysis", "identify threats", "security threat assessment", or needs to systematically identify and document threats to a system or feature - even if they don't explicitly say "threat model".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query a MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) instance via PyMISP to compute event statistics, IOC type breakdowns, threat actor galaxy clusters, and tag trends, and generate threat landscape reports with temporal trends. Use when asked to analyze threat intelligence data, summarize top threat actors or malware families, or produce a CTI landscape report from MISP events.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze the threat landscape using MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) by querying event statistics, attribute distributions, threat actor galaxy clusters, and tag trends over time. Uses PyMISP to pull event data, compute IOC type breakdowns, identify top threat actors and malware families, and generate threat landscape reports with temporal trends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a threat model for a target codebase. Three modes: "interview" walks an application owner through the four-question framework and produces a threat model from their answers; "bootstrap" derives a threat model from the code plus past vulnerabilities (CVEs, git history, pentest reports) when no owner is available; "bootstrap-then-interview" chains the two when both owner and codebase are present. All write THREAT_MODEL.md in a shared schema. Use when asked to "threat model", "build a threat model", "map the attack surface", or "what should we be worried about in this codebase".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a codebase and produce a structured threat model at .turbo/threat-model.md covering assets, trust boundaries, attack surfaces with existing mitigations, attacker stories, and calibrated severity. Use when the user asks to "create a threat model", "threat model", "threat model this codebase", "security analysis", "analyze the attack surface", "what are the threats", or "identify security risks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a systematic threat-hunt workflow that turns threat intelligence and ATT&CK gap analysis into testable hypotheses, then executes and validates them via EDR/SIEM queries (CrowdStrike, Defender, Splunk, Elastic, Sysmon, Velociraptor, Sigma) and documents findings in a standardized hunt report. Use when planning or running a proactive threat hunt or scoping compromise from an intel- or anomaly-driven lead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically map threat actor behavior and observed IOCs to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, build technique coverage heatmaps with the ATT&CK Navigator, identify detection gaps, and produce actionable threat intelligence reports across the Enterprise, Mobile, and ICS matrices. Use when analyzing threat actor TTPs, correlating IOCs to specific ATT&CK techniques, or assessing defensive detection coverage against adversary behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Use when the user asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats or abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do NOT use for general architecture summaries, code review, security best practices (use security-best-practices), or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct LINDDUN privacy threat modeling across all seven categories: Linking, Identifying, Non-repudiation, Detecting, Data Disclosure, Unawareness, and Non-compliance. Includes DFD-based analysis, threat trees, privacy-specific mitigation strategies, and integration with STRIDE security threat modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete guide to LINDDUN privacy threat modeling methodology covering seven threat categories: Linking, Identifying, Non-repudiation, Detecting, Data Disclosure, Unawareness, and Non-compliance. Includes DFD-based analysis, threat tree catalogs, mitigation mapping to privacy design patterns, and step-by-step process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develops comprehensive threat actor profiles for APT groups, criminal organizations, and hacktivist collectives by aggregating TTP documentation, historical campaign data, tooling fingerprints, and attribution indicators from multiple intelligence sources. Use when briefing executives on sector-specific threats, updating threat model assumptions, or prioritizing defensive controls against specific adversaries. Activates for requests involving MITRE ATT&CK Groups, Mandiant APT profiles, CrowdStrike adversary naming, or sector-specific threat briefings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement API threat protection using Google Apigee policies including JSON/XML threat protection, OAuth 2.0, SpikeArrest, and Advanced API Security for OWASP Top 10 defense.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze the threat landscape using MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) by querying event statistics, attribute distributions, threat actor galaxy clusters, and tag trends over time. Uses PyMISP to pull event data, compute IOC type breakdowns, identify top threat actors and malware families, and generate threat landscape reports with temporal trends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze the threat landscape using MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) by querying event statistics, attribute distributions, threat actor galaxy clusters, and tag trends over time. Uses PyMISP to pull event data, compute IOC type breakdowns, identify top threat actors and malware families, and generate threat landscape reports with temporal trends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enterprise-review-grade threat model from `harness threat-model {path}`. Categorizes MCP-surface threats; emits `worst: 'clean'|'low'|'medium'|'high'` + per-threat findings. Pure-read.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect insider threat behavioral indicators including unusual data access, off-hours activity, mass file downloads, privilege abuse, and resignation-correlated data theft. Use when proactively threat-hunting for malicious or negligent insider activity, or when investigating a departing or disgruntled employee for potential data theft.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy MISP, configure threat feeds (MISP community, freetext, TAXII, CSV), and use the PyMISP API to programmatically fetch, add, and search events and IOCs, building automated collection pipelines that aggregate indicators from community and commercial sources. Use when gathering, storing, or correlating IOCs and threat intelligence, or when scripting MISP ingestion via PyMISP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build automated IOC enrichment pipelines in Splunk Enterprise Security by ingesting threat feeds into KV Store collections and correlating them against security events via lookup tables, modular inputs, and the Threat Intelligence Framework. Use when wiring threat intel into Splunk correlation searches to flag IOC matches and cut SOC triage time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。