「viewer」の検索結果

Add a viewer, configure a viewer, change viewer options, find viewer, close viewer, view a scatter plot, bar chart, histogram, line chart, box plot, pie chart, heat map, correlation plot, 3D scatter, trellis, density plot, statistics, on a Datagrok TableView via the datagrok_exec tool. Use whenever the user asks to plot, chart, visualize, show a graph, draw a distribution, color by a column, swap a viewer's axis, toggle a legend / regression line / log scale, replace one viewer with another, close every chart, reset the view to just the grid, or find an existing viewer by type. Plugin viewers like "Chem space", "sequence space", "activity cliffs" are NOT viewer types — they're registered functions — route those to `grok.functions.call`. Does NOT cover filtering (separate skill `datagrok-filtering`), selection (`datagrok-selection`), grid cell rendering (`datagrok-grid-customization`), layout save/restore, or custom-viewer authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

5つの専門エージェント（backend-reviewer, frontend-reviewer, test-reviewer, security-reviewer, ux-reviewer）がチームでコードレビューするスキル。 git diff ベースで変更ファイルを検出し、各専門家が並列でレビューして 統合レポート（Markdown）を docs/reviews/ に出力する。 Use when: コードレビューしたい、変更をレビュー、レビューチーム、 チームレビュー、実装をチェック、品質チェック。 Triggers: "レビュー", "review", "コードレビュー", "code review", "チームレビュー", "team review", "変更をチェック", "品質チェック"

Uncorrelated Evaluator — 4軸ルーブリック専門エージェント（functionality-reviewer・code-reviewer・design-reviewer・originality-reviewer）と security-reviewer を5並列実行し、成果物を多面的に独立評価します。PASS / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED 判定を返します。Self-leniency 防止のため、実装エージェントのコンテキストを引き継がない新規エージェントとして起動します。「レビューして」「評価して」「実装を確認して」などのリクエストで起動します。

Trustpilot customer reviews scraper for any company listed on trustpilot.com — given a company domain (e.g. shopify.com, apple.com, shopwagandtail.com) plus optional filters (page number, single star rating 1-5, single language ISO code, verified-only flag, has-company-reply flag, date period last30days/last3months/last6months/last12months, free-text keyword search, and reviewer countryCode client-side filter), extracts paginated reviews with 20+ fields per review: reviewId, reviewUrl, reviewTitle, reviewDescription, reviewRatingScore (1-5), reviewDate (ISO publishedDate), reviewDateOfExperience, reviewLabel, isReviewVerified, reviewer (display name), reviewerId, reviewersCountry (ISO Alpha-2), reviewLanguage, reviewCompanyResponse (the company reply text), plus pagination metadata (currentPage, totalPages, totalCount). Optional flags add reviewer profile metadata (reviewerNumberOfReviews, reviewerProfileIsVerified), reply analysis dates (companyReplyPublishedDate, companyReplyUpdatedDate), extended metadata (reviewSource, reviewVerificationSource, reviewLikes), and review photos. Use when user mentions Trustpilot reviews, scrape Trustpilot, get reviews from Trustpilot, Trustpilot review scraper, Trustpilot customer reviews, extract Trustpilot reviews, Trustpilot review data, download Trustpilot reviews, paginate Trustpilot, paginated Trustpilot reviews, filter Trustpilot reviews by star, filter Trustpilot by language, verified reviews Trustpilot, has reply Trustpilot, company response Trustpilot, Trustpilot reply analysis, brand monitoring Trustpilot, sentiment analysis Trustpilot, competitor reviews Trustpilot, bulk reviews from a Trustpilot page, batch download reviews, trustpilot.com reviews scraping, fake review research Trustpilot, Trustpilot dataset, persona research from Trustpilot reviews, Trustpilot keyword search reviews, Trustpilot date range reviews, review export Trustpilot. Also applies to comparing review trends across competitors, training data for LLM sentiment classifiers, monitoring competitor response time, exporting reviews for BI dashboards, lead generation from active reviewers, ML / fake-review detection, and aggregator sites that display third-party reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simulate a Nature-style reviewer assessment from the referee perspective rather than an author rebuttal. Use when the user wants a pre-submission review, reviewer report, peer-review style critique, novelty/significance/technical soundness assessment, reviewer-style manuscript evaluation, 审稿人视角评估, 预审稿意见, or Nature reviewer report. Return 3 reviewer reports plus a cross-review synthesis, grounded only in the local Nature reviewer source basis. Also trigger on general pre-submission review requests during academic writing even without the word "Nature", such as getting a mock peer review for any journal, critiquing a draft as a reviewer would, assessing novelty/rigor before submission, and Chinese phrasings like 审稿人视角、模拟审稿、预审、帮我审一下论文、投稿前自审、审稿意见模拟、找论文问题.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정, revisar artículo, revisión entre pares, revisión de manuscrito, informe de árbitro, revisa mi artículo, criticar artículo, simular revisión, revisión editorial, calibrar revisor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding or changing what the rezolus viewer exposes — an /api/v1 endpoint, a dashboard section, the metric catalog, metadata/description derivation, or the frontend data those depend on — or when editing src/viewer/ or crates/viewer/, or reviewing a viewer change. The viewer ships as two separate Rust backends (server + WASM) behind one shared frontend; changing one silently diverges them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web 线上展览开发 (虚拟展厅) (Web 线上展览 / 虚拟展厅开发 (从业者/工程视角) — 用 web 技术开发线上展览、虚拟展厅、云展会、数字展馆，覆盖 3D 空间、全景漫游、WebXR、文博数字化、营销云展厅、3D 商品展示等形态。覆盖: (a) 技术栈 — 3D web(Three.js / React Three Fiber / Babylon.js / Google model-viewer / WebGL / WebGPU)、全景(Pannellum / Marzipano / Photo Sphere Viewer / krpano / 720云)、WebXR(WebXR Device API / A-Frame)、资产管线(glTF·GLB / Draco / Meshopt / KTX2 纹理压缩 / gltf-transform / LOD); (b) 自研 vs SaaS 平台选型(国内: 众趣 / 酷雷曼 / 比目鱼 / 会鸽 / 3DVista; 海外: Matterport / Kuula / Artsteps / Spatial); (c) 性能优化(大场景加载 / 模型轻量化 / draw call / 移动端 / 首屏 / 显存)——web 3D 第一性难题; (d) 策展与导览(动线设计 / 热点 hotspot / 语音讲解 / 交互); (e) 文博数字化(IIIF / 数字孪生 / 高清文物) 与 会展·电商商业化(营销云展厅 / 数据埋点 / 线索转化); (f) 部署(CDN / 流式加载 / 跨端兼容 / WebGL 降级)。学派分歧: 自研 Three.js vs SaaS 平台、真 3D 重场景 vs 720 全景轻量、WebGL vs WebGPU、文博考据派 vs 营销转化派、沉浸优先 vs 加载优先。不含: 线下展陈 / 展台搭建、原生 VR App(非 web)、通用 3D 游戏开发、纯 3D 建模教程。) Master OS — automated mastery of Web 线上展览 / 虚拟展厅开发 (从业者/工程视角) — 用 web 技术开发线上展览、虚拟展厅、云展会、数字展馆，覆盖 3D 空间、全景漫游、WebXR、文博数字化、营销云展厅、3D 商品展示等形态。覆盖: (a) 技术栈 — 3D web(Three.js / React Three Fiber / Babylon.js / Google model-viewer / WebGL / WebGPU)、全景(Pannellum / Marzipano / Photo Sphere Viewer / krpano / 720云)、WebXR(WebXR Device API / A-Frame)、资产管线(glTF·GLB / Draco / Meshopt / KTX2 纹理压缩 / gltf-transform / LOD); (b) 自研 vs SaaS 平台选型(国内: 众趣 / 酷雷曼 / 比目鱼 / 会鸽 / 3DVista; 海外: Matterport / Kuula / Artsteps / Spatial); (c) 性能优化(大场景加载 / 模型轻量化 / draw call / 移动端 / 首屏 / 显存)——web 3D 第一性难题; (d) 策展与导览(动线设计 / 热点 hotspot / 语音讲解 / 交互); (e) 文博数字化(IIIF / 数字孪生 / 高清文物) 与 会展·电商商业化(营销云展厅 / 数据埋点 / 线索转化); (f) 部署(CDN / 流式加载 / 跨端兼容 / WebGL 降级)。学派分歧: 自研 Three.js vs SaaS 平台、真 3D 重场景 vs 720 全景轻量、WebGL vs WebGPU、文博考据派 vs 营销转化派、沉浸优先 vs 加载优先。不含: 线下展陈 / 展台搭建、原生 VR App(非 web)、通用 3D 游戏开发、纯 3D 建模教程。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on Web 线上展览 / 虚拟展厅开发 (从业者/工程视角) — 用 web 技术开发线上展览、虚拟展厅、云展会、数字展馆，覆盖 3D 空间、全景漫游、WebXR、文博数字化、营销云展厅、3D 商品展示等形态。覆盖: (a) 技术栈 — 3D web(Three.js / React Three Fiber / Babylon.js / Google model-viewer / WebGL / WebGPU)、全景(Pannellum / Marzipano / Photo Sphere Viewer / krpano / 720云)、WebXR(WebXR Device API / A-Frame)、资产管线(glTF·GLB / Draco / Meshopt / KTX2 纹理压缩 / gltf-transform / LOD); (b) 自研 vs SaaS 平台选型(国内: 众趣 / 酷雷曼 / 比目鱼 / 会鸽 / 3DVista; 海外: Matterport / Kuula / Artsteps / Spatial); (c) 性能优化(大场景加载 / 模型轻量化 / draw call / 移动端 / 首屏 / 显存)——web 3D 第一性难题; (d) 策展与导览(动线设计 / 热点 hotspot / 语音讲解 / 交互); (e) 文博数字化(IIIF / 数字孪生 / 高清文物) 与 会展·电商商业化(营销云展厅 / 数据埋点 / 线索转化); (f) 部署(CDN / 流式加载 / 跨端兼容 / WebGL 降级)。学派分歧: 自研 Three.js vs SaaS 平台、真 3D 重场景 vs 720 全景轻量、WebGL vs WebGPU、文博考据派 vs 营销转化派、沉浸优先 vs 加载优先。不含: 线下展陈 / 展台搭建、原生 VR App(非 web)、通用 3D 游戏开发、纯 3D 建模教程。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「线上展览」「虚拟展厅」「web 线上展览」「云展厅」「数字展馆」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the end-to-end viewer smoke test (`tests/viewer_smoke.sh`). Spawns `rezolus view` in upload-only, file, A/B, and proxy modes, exercises the API endpoints, and verifies experiment attach/detach. Use after any change touching `src/viewer/` or before opening a viewer-related PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger: reviewer transport, advisory transport, review adapter, lens prompt/schema, OpenCode reviewer plugin, Codex reviewer, ReviewProviderContract. Enforce the shared Go advisory reviewer transport contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use as the top-level router for Omniverse Realtime Viewer USD app requests and focused viewer reference documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft, audit, or revise point-by-point reviewer response letters for Nature-family manuscript revisions. Use when the user provides reviewer comments, editor decision letters, revision notes, response drafts, or asks how to respond to major/minor revision requests, rebuttal letters, response to reviewers, peer-review reports, 审稿意见回复, 逐点回复, 修回信, 大修回复, 小修回复, or 如何回复 reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use as the top-level router for Omniverse Realtime Viewer USD app requests and focused viewer reference documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when explaining or planning around AISTATS peer review, OpenReview review release, author-reviewer discussion, reviewer volunteer expectations, reviewer confidentiality, decision criteria, meta-review dynamics, the statistician-heavy reviewer pool, and PMLR proceedings outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to anticipate reviewer questions, select the strongest ablations to present, prepare rebuttals, or identify paper weaknesses before submission. Triggers on phrases like "reviewer questions", "anticipate reviewers", "rebuttal", "paper weaknesses", "defend the paper", or "strengthen the paper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

原始人スタイル subagent への委譲判断ガイド。`genshijin-investigator` (コード位置特定)、 `genshijin-builder` (1-2ファイル編集)、`genshijin-reviewer` (diff レビュー) を inline作業 or vanilla `Explore` の代わりにスポーンするタイミングを示す。subagent 出力は原始人圧縮 → 主コンテキストに戻る tool-result が約60%縮小 → 長セッション持続。 Trigger: 「subagent 委譲」「genshijin-crew 使用」「investigator/builder/reviewer 起動」「コンテキスト節約」「圧縮 agent 出力」。

Render the running viewer in a real headless browser and assert on what it drew — element geometry, computed colours, wrap points, truncated labels, console errors. Use when a change moves pixels (navbar/badge/chart layout, CSS, responsive behavior, theme), when a PR says it "needs a visual check", or when reviewing frontend work under src/viewer/assets/. Covers the gap viewer-smoke names: it asserts payload shape, this asserts rendering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CesiumJS viewer setup - Viewer, CesiumWidget, widgets, Ion token, Scene configuration, SceneMode, factory helpers, geocoders, platform services. Use when initializing a CesiumJS application, configuring viewer widgets, setting Ion access tokens, creating default terrain or imagery, or bootstrapping a 3D globe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simulate rigorous, fair peer review on a paper — in two modes. (A) Red-team YOUR OWN draft before submission to predict the reviews you'll get and get a fix list. (B) Review SOMEONE ELSE'S paper when you're an assigned reviewer or helping your advisor — produce a fair, venue-formatted, submission-ready review. Use whenever the user gives a paper (PDF, .tex, .md, arXiv link, or pasted text) and wants to predict reviews, find weaknesses before reviewers do, stress-test a submission, OR write a real review of another paper. Grounded in official NeurIPS/ICLR/ACL reviewer guidelines; every criticism pinned to a location, and checked against ACL's H1–H17 list of illegitimate critiques. 两种模式:审自己的稿(投稿前红队)/ 审别人的稿(当审稿人或帮导师),按会议官方标准评,绝不脑补、绝不发不正当批评。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

`.agent/agents/reviewer.md` を入口に、PR差分やローカル差分を日本語でレビューするスキル。ユーザーが「レビュー」「PR確認」「差分確認」「コードレビュー」「reviewer」「レビュー指摘に対応」などを依頼したときに使う。GitHubレビュー指摘の対応（分類・方針提示・Worker委譲・resolved化）も扱う。

Iterative manuscript improvement workflow where a reviewer agent critiques, an author agent revises, a verifier checks the revision, and the loop repeats until acceptance or a human-pause condition is reached. Use for virtual peer review, reviewer-author revision loops, rebuttal preparation, resubmission polishing, journal paper improvement, response-to-reviewers drafting, and deciding when additional data, experiments, theory, modeling, or author judgment is required before further revision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。