「vss」の検索結果

Scaffold a standalone RTVI CV microservice that plugs into VSS Search and Alerts profiles via Kafka mdx-raw. The shipped scaffold script is a YOLO26 reference implementation (ONNX, labels, custom parser required). Use when building a new perception microservice repo, validating the VSS integration contract, extending that scaffold for segmentation frame-mask payloads, or scaffolding with placeholders before customer YOLO26 assets exist. For swapping the detector in the stock vss-rt-cv container, use rtvi-cv-customize-model instead. Live DeepStream integration cannot run until the customer-supplied ONNX, labels file, and parser library exist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to swap the VLM in the VSS Alerts Blueprint — covers RTVI-VLM microservice deployment methods, all three VLM consumers (rtvi-vlm, vlm-as-verifier, vss-agent), and health checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) scores from vulnerability data sources with proper fallback handling. This skill covers understanding CVSS v3, handling multiple score sources (NVD, GHSA, RedHat), implementing source priority logic, and dealing with missing scores in security reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesized reference notes from three US Government vehicle-safety sources: NHTSA Cybersecurity Best Practices for the Safety of Modern Vehicles (updated 2022, final), NHTSA Automated Driving Systems 2.0: A Vision for Safety (2017), and a 16-section selection of 49 CFR Part 571 (FMVSS) pinned at eCFR versioner date 2025-01-01. Use for voluntary vehicle cybersecurity practices, the ADS 2.0 twelve priority safety design elements, and FMVSS occupant protection, brakes/stability/lighting, and fuel/EV integrity requirements. Not ISO 26262, not ASPICE, not ISO/SAE 21434, not UNECE R155/R156, not SAE J3016, and not the full Part 571; the FMVSS material is a selection of vehicle-level minimum performance standards, not a process standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Penetration test and red team report writing methodology. Covers executive summary structuring (risk-led narrative for non-technical readers), technical finding format (title, severity, affected scope, narrative, reproduction steps, impact, remediation, references), CVSS v3.1 / v4.0 scoring with vector justification, OWASP risk rating, evidence hygiene (redacting credentials, hashing client data, time-stamping every action), screenshot and PoC artifact management, finding chain narratives, scope/limitations/assumptions documentation, retest evidence and remediation tracking, deliverable formats (PDF, DOCX, HTML, JSON for SIEM ingestion), client-customer-deliverable separation, and common report mistakes (over-CVSSing, undermining the triager, missing the 'so what'). Use at the end of an engagement when authoring a deliverable, when restructuring a draft for executive readability, or when establishing a reusable report template for a consulting practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to swap the DeepStream CV detection model in the VSS Alerts Blueprint verification (2d_cv) mode - covers ONNX export, custom bbox parsers, compose mount gotchas, nvinfer config, runtime TRT engine build, deployment, and a segmentation-capable model addendum handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dependency auditing, CVE detection, configuration security review, CVSS scoring, and prioritized vulnerability reporting

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes professional bug bounty reports for HackerOne, Bugcrowd, and Intigriti with CVSS 4.0 scoring, business impact, working exploits, and remediation. Runs 5-check Pre-Report Verification first: hallucination detection, AI writing patterns, PoC reproducibility, duplicate detection, and impact plausibility. Use when user describes a vulnerability, shares HTTP logs, HAR files, recon output, or screenshots; says 'write a bug report', 'format my finding', 'draft a vuln report', 'is this valid', 'rate my vulnerability', 'verify my report', or any variant. Trigger for partial or messy input — raw notes, one-liners, or full writeups all work. Do not wait for perfect input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en bug bounty (HackerOne, Bugcrowd, scope, PII, CVSS scoring, responsible disclosure)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Penetration test and red team report writing methodology. Covers executive summary structuring (risk-led narrative for non-technical readers), technical finding format (title, severity, affected scope, narrative, reproduction steps, impact, remediation, references), CVSS v3.1 / v4.0 scoring with vector justification, OWASP risk rating, evidence hygiene (redacting credentials, hashing client data, time-stamping every action), screenshot and PoC artifact management, finding chain narratives, scope/limitations/assumptions documentation, retest evidence and remediation tracking, deliverable formats (PDF, DOCX, HTML, JSON for SIEM ingestion), client-customer-deliverable separation, and common report mistakes (over-CVSSing, undermining the triager, missing the 'so what'). Use at the end of an engagement when authoring a deliverable, when restructuring a draft for executive readability, or when establishing a reusable report template for a consulting practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a structured vulnerability scanning workflow using tools like Nessus, Qualys, and OpenVAS to discover, prioritize, and track remediation of security vulnerabilities across infrastructure. Use when SOC teams need to establish recurring vulnerability assessment processes, integrate scan results with SIEM alerting, and build remediation tracking dashboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for NVIDIA-related requests where an NVIDIA skill might help, even if the user did not ask for a skill. Trigger on NVIDIA products, hardware, software, SDKs, GPUs, Jetson/JetPack/L4T/BSP/SDK Manager/driver/flashing/setup, CUDA, NIM, NeMo, Omniverse/OpenUSD/SimReady, RAPIDS/cuDF, cuPyNumeric, cuOpt, Dynamo, Holoscan, TensorRT, DeepStream, VSS, TAO, NGC/NVCF. Do not use for generic non-NVIDIA route, optimize, deploy, AI, video, data, or infrastructure tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete bug bounty workflow — recon, pre-hunt learning, vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining, bypass tables, language-specific grep patterns, and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finding validation before writing any report — 7-Question Gate (all 7 questions), 4 pre-submission gates, always-rejected list, conditionally valid with chain table, CVSS 3.1 quick reference, severity decision guide, report title formula, 60-second pre-submit checklist. Use BEFORE writing any report. One wrong answer = kill the finding and move on. Saves N/A ratio.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete bug bounty workflow — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — starting a new target, doing recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports. 中文触发词：漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug bounty report writing for H1/Bugcrowd/Intigriti/Immunefi — report templates, human tone guidelines, impact-first writing, CVSS 3.1 scoring, title formula, impact statement formula, severity decision guide, downgrade counters, pre-submit checklist. Use after validating a finding and before submitting. Never use "could potentially" — prove it or don't report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finding validation before writing any report — 7-Question Gate (all 7 questions), 4 pre-submission gates, always-rejected list, conditionally valid with chain table, CVSS 3.1 quick reference, severity decision guide, report title formula, 60-second pre-submit checklist. Use BEFORE writing any report. One wrong answer = kill the finding and move on. Saves N/A ratio.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug bounty report writing for H1/Bugcrowd/Intigriti/Immunefi — report templates, human tone guidelines, impact-first writing, CVSS 3.1 scoring, title formula, impact statement formula, severity decision guide, downgrade counters, pre-submit checklist. Validation gates and the submittability/always-rejected decision are owned by triage-validation; this skill owns the written report itself (templates, tone, formulas). Use after validating a finding and before submitting. Never use "could potentially" — prove it or don't report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Local-tooling companion to the bug-bounty orchestrator — carries the SAME complete bug-bounty workflow, but reach for THIS variant when you also need to resolve where tools, wordlists, and clones are installed on the local machine (jhaddix, SecLists, trufflehog, ffuf, dalfox, ghauri); for pure orchestration/routing use the bug-bounty skill. Workflow it covers — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use when you need the local install path of a tool / wordlist / clone for a hunt, or as the full-workflow variant when operating from this local toolkit; for general routing use the bug-bounty skill. 中文触发词：漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete bug bounty workflow — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — starting a new target, doing recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports. 中文触发词：漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for NVIDIA-related requests where an NVIDIA skill might help, even if the user did not ask for a skill. Trigger on NVIDIA products, hardware, software, SDKs, GPUs, Jetson/JetPack/L4T/BSP/SDK Manager/driver/flashing/setup, CUDA, NIM, NeMo, Omniverse/OpenUSD/SimReady, Isaac, RAPIDS/cuDF, cuPyNumeric, cuOpt, Dynamo, Holoscan, TensorRT, DeepStream, VSS, TAO, NGC/NVCF. Do not use for generic non-NVIDIA route, optimize, deploy, AI, video, data, or infrastructure tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CVE lookup and triage — map discovered services/versions to known CVEs via the cve_lookup tool, score by CVSS/exploitability, and prioritize what to verify first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Final arbiter for Bug Hunter. Receives Hunter findings and Skeptic challenges, independently re-reads code, and delivers authoritative verdicts with CVSS scoring and proof-of-concept generation for security findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage a single security finding — from a scanner, audit, advisory, or report — to a defensible disposition with a mitigation plan, false-positive justification, or accepted-risk writeup. Use when the user mentions 'triage this finding,' 'is this a real vulnerability,' 'mitigation plan,' 'false positive,' 'accept this risk,' 'compensating controls,' 'risk justification,' 'security ticket,' 'CVSS this,' 'should we fix this,' 'disposition,' 'sign off on,' or has a single security finding and needs to decide what to do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。