本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

binary-re:static-analysis

Performs static analysis of binary code using radare2 and Ghidra — function enumeration, cross-reference tracing, decompilation, and control flow graphs without executing the binary. Use when disassembling or decompiling code, mapping functions, tracing data flow, or building hypotheses before dynamic verification.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md8.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Static Analysis (Phases 2-3)

Purpose

Understand binary structure and logic without execution. Map functions, trace data flow, decompile critical code.

When to Use

  • After triage has established architecture and ABI
  • To understand specific functions identified as interesting
  • When dynamic analysis is impractical or risky
  • To build hypotheses before dynamic verification

Two-Stage Approach

Stage 1 (Light): Function enumeration, strings, imports - fast, broad coverage Stage 2 (Deep): Targeted decompilation, CFG analysis - slow, focused

Stage 1: Light Analysis (radare2)

Analysis Depth Selection

Binary SizeCommandTradeoff
< 500KBaaaFull analysis, may be slow
500KB - 5MBaa; aacFunctions + all call targets
> 5MBaa + targeted af @addrFast, manual depth control

Session Setup

# Launch r2 with controlled analysis
r2 -q0 -e scr.color=false -e anal.timeout=120 -e anal.maxsize=67108864 binary

# Inside r2 (choose based on binary size):
aa       # Basic analysis
aac      # Also analyze all call targets (recommended for most binaries)

Critical settings:

  • anal.timeout=120 - Prevent runaway analysis
  • anal.maxsize=67108864 - 64MB max function size
  • Use aa; aac for medium binaries, aaa only for small ones

Handling Unanalyzed Call Targets

If axtj returns empty for known imports:

# The import may be called indirectly or analysis was too shallow
# Option 1: Deeper analysis
aac   # Analyze all calls

# Option 2: Manually create function at call target
af @0x8048abc

# Option 3: Search for references to import address
axtj @sym.imp.connect

Function Enumeration

# All functions as JSON
aflj

# Filter by name pattern
aflj~main
aflj~init
aflj~network
aflj~send
aflj~recv

# Function count
afl~?

Cross-Reference Analysis

# Who calls this function?
axtj @sym.imp.connect

# What does this function call?
axfj @sym.main

# Data references to address
axtj @0x12345

String-Function Correlation

# Find which function contains a string
izj~api.vendor.com
# Note the vaddr, then find containing function
afi @0xVADDR

# Or search and map
"/j api"    # Search for string
axtj @@hit* # Xrefs to all hits

Import/Export Mapping

# Imports with addresses
iij

# Exports with addresses
iEj

# Symbols (if not stripped)
isj

Quick Disassembly

# Disassemble function as JSON
pdfj @sym.main

# Disassemble N instructions from address
pdj 20 @0x8400

# Print function summary
afi @sym.main

Stage 2: Deep Analysis

r2ghidra Availability Check

Before attempting decompilation, verify r2ghidra is installed:

# Check if r2ghidra is available
r2 -qc 'pdg?' - 2>/dev/null | grep -q Usage && echo "r2ghidra OK" || echo "SKIP: r2ghidra not installed"

# If missing, install with:
r2pm -ci r2ghidra

If r2ghidra unavailable: Rely on disassembly (pdf) and cross-reference analysis (axt/axf).

Targeted Decompilation (r2ghidra)

# Decompile specific function
pdgj @sym.target_function

# Or named function
pdgj @sym.main

Ghidra Headless (Large Binaries)

For complex functions or when r2ghidra struggles:

# Create analysis project and run script
analyzeHeadless /tmp/ghidra_proj proj \
  -import binary \
  -overwrite \
  -processor ARM:LE:32:v7 \
  -postScript ExportDecompilation.java sym.target_function \
  -deleteProject

Processor strings:

  • ARM 32-bit: ARM:LE:32:v7 or ARM:LE:32:Cortex
  • ARM 64-bit: AARCH64:LE:64:v8A
  • x86_64: x86:LE:64:default
  • MIPS LE: MIPS:LE:32:default
  • MIPS BE: MIPS:BE:32:default

Control Flow Analysis

# Basic blocks in function
afbj @sym.main

# Function call graph (dot format)
agCd @sym.main > callgraph.dot

# Control flow graph
agfd @sym.main > cfg.dot

Data Structure Recovery

# Analyze local variables
afvj @sym.main

# Stack frame layout
afvd @sym.main

# Global data references
adrj

Analysis Patterns

Pattern: Network Function Tracing

# Find all network-related calls
axtj @sym.imp.socket
axtj @sym.imp.connect
axtj @sym.imp.send
axtj @sym.imp.recv
axtj @sym.imp.SSL_read
axtj @sym.imp.SSL_write

# Trace caller chain
for func in $(aflj | jq -r '.[].name'); do
  axfj @$func | grep -q "socket\|connect" && echo $func
done

Pattern: Configuration File Analysis

# Find file operations
axtj @sym.imp.open
axtj @sym.imp.fopen

# Trace string arguments
"/j /etc"
"/j .conf"
"/j .json"

# Check what functions reference these paths

Pattern: Crypto Identification

# Common crypto imports
axtj @sym.imp.EVP_EncryptInit
axtj @sym.imp.AES_encrypt
axtj @sym.imp.SHA256

# Hardcoded keys (check strings near crypto calls)
izj | jq '.strings[] | select(.length == 16 or .length == 32)'

r2 JSON Commands Reference

CommandOutputUse Case
afljFunctions listMap code structure
axtj @addrXrefs TO addressWho uses this?
axfj @addrXrefs FROM addressWhat does it call?
pdfj @addrDisassemblyUnderstand instructions
pdgj @addrDecompilationPseudo-C output
afbj @addrBasic blocksControl flow
izjData stringsConfiguration, URLs
iijImportsExternal dependencies
iEjExportsPublic interface
afvj @addrLocal variablesStack analysis

Output Format

Record analysis findings as structured facts:

{
  "functions_analyzed": [
    {
      "name": "sub_8400",
      "address": "0x8400",
      "size": 256,
      "calls": ["socket", "connect", "send"],
      "called_by": ["main", "init_network"],
      "strings_referenced": ["api.vendor.com"],
      "hypothesis": "network_initialization"
    }
  ],
  "call_graph": {
    "main": ["init_config", "init_network", "main_loop"],
    "init_network": ["sub_8400", "SSL_CTX_new"]
  },
  "data_flow": [
    {
      "source": "config_file_read",
      "through": ["parse_config", "extract_url"],
      "sink": "connect_to_server"
    }
  ]
}

Knowledge Journaling

After static analysis, record findings for episodic memory:

[BINARY-RE:static] {filename} (sha256: {hash})

Functions analyzed: {count}
Decompilation performed: {yes|no}

Key functions:
  FACT: Function at {addr} calls {imports} (source: r2 axfj)
  FACT: Function at {addr} references string "{string}" (source: r2 axtj)
  FACT: Function {name} appears to {purpose} (source: decompilation)

Cross-references:
  FACT: {caller} calls {callee} (source: r2 axtj)

HYPOTHESIS UPDATE: {refined theory} (confidence: {new_value})
  Supporting: {fact_ids}
  Contradicting: {fact_ids}

New questions:
  QUESTION: {discovered unknown}

Answered questions:
  RESOLVED: {question} → {answer}

Example Journal Entry

[BINARY-RE:static] thermostat_daemon (sha256: a1b2c3d4...)

Functions analyzed: 47
Decompilation performed: yes (function 0x8400)

Key functions:
  FACT: Function 0x8400 calls curl_easy_perform, curl_easy_setopt (source: r2 axfj)
  FACT: Function 0x8400 references string "api.thermco.com/telemetry" (source: r2 axtj)
  FACT: Function 0x9200 parses JSON using jsmn library (source: decompilation)
  FACT: Function 0x10800 is main loop, calls 0x8400 after sleep(30) (source: r2 pdf)

Cross-references:
  FACT: main calls init_config (0x9000) then main_loop (0x10800) (source: r2 axtj)
  FACT: main_loop calls send_telemetry (0x8400) in loop (source: r2 pdf)

HYPOTHESIS UPDATE: Telemetry client sending to api.thermco.com every 30 seconds (confidence: 0.85)
  Supporting: URL string, curl imports, sleep(30) in loop
  Contradicting: none

New questions:
  QUESTION: What data fields are included in telemetry payload?
  QUESTION: Is there any authentication/API key?

Answered questions:
  RESOLVED: "What endpoint?" → api.thermco.com/telemetry via HTTPS

Decision Points

After static analysis:

  1. Identified critical functions? → Ready for dynamic verification
  2. Unclear behavior? → Try dynamic analysis for runtime observation
  3. Crypto detected? → Document key handling, note for security review
  4. Anti-analysis patterns? → Consider Unicorn snippet emulation

Next Steps

→ binary-re:dynamic-analysis to verify hypotheses with runtime observation → binary-re:synthesis if sufficient understanding reached

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

binary-re

無料

Analyzes ELF binaries, executables, and firmware images to understand behavior without source code; coordinates sub-skills binary-re:triage, binary-re:static-analysis, binary-re:dynamic-analysis, binary-re:synthesis, and binary-re:tool-setup. Use when working with a binary, executable, or ELF file; asked to reverse engineer, disassemble, decompile, or figure out what something does; targeting ARM64, ARMv7, x86_64, or MIPS; or analyzing Python bytecode (.pyc, marshal). For Python bytecode analysis, see docs/python-bytecode-re.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

2389-research/binary-re202026年9月26日 更新

Observes runtime behavior of binaries via QEMU emulation, GDB debugging, and Frida hooking — syscall tracing, breakpoints, memory inspection, and function interception. Use when running, tracing, or debugging a binary, verifying hypotheses from static analysis, or watching actual syscalls, network calls, or file access; requires human approval before any execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

2389-research/binary-re202026年9月26日 更新

Compiles binary analysis findings into structured reports — correlates facts from triage, static, and dynamic phases, validates hypotheses against evidence, and produces traceable documentation. Use when ready to summarize findings, generate a report, document what a binary does, or prepare results for handoff or archival.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

2389-research/binary-re202026年9月26日 更新

Installs and configures reverse engineering tools including radare2, Ghidra, GDB, QEMU, Frida, and cross-compilation toolchains for ARM64, ARMv7, x86_64, and MIPS. Use when a tool command fails, a required tool is missing, or you need to set up a fresh analysis environment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

2389-research/binary-re202026年9月26日 更新

Fingerprints unknown binaries using rabin2 — detects architecture (ARM, x86, MIPS), ABI, libc, dependencies, and strings of interest. Use when first encountering an unknown binary, ELF file, or firmware blob, or when you need architecture or ABI information before committing to deeper analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

2389-research/binary-re202026年9月26日 更新

2389-research のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する