autoresearch

${var} — Name of the skill to evolve (e.g. token-movers). Required.

If ${var} is empty, abort with: "autoresearch requires var= set to a skill name" and exit.

Read memory/MEMORY.md for context.

Goal

Improve an existing skill by researching better approaches, generating 4 distinct variations, scoring them against a rubric, and committing the winning version as a PR.

Steps

1. Load the target skill

Read skills/${var}/SKILL.md. If the file doesn't exist, abort and notify: "Skill '${var}' not found."

Parse the skill's:

• Purpose: what it does
• Data sources: APIs, URLs, commands it calls
• Output format: what it produces (article, notification, file)
• Dependencies: env vars, tools, other files it reads

Save the original content — you'll need it for the PR diff later.

2. Research improvements

Search the web for better approaches to what this skill does:

• Alternative or complementary APIs/data sources
• Best practices for the skill's domain (e.g., crypto analysis, RSS aggregation, security scanning)
• Common pitfalls or failure modes for the techniques the skill uses
• Output formats that are more actionable or readable

Also review:

• Recent memory/logs/ entries where this skill ran — did it produce useful output? Were there failures?
• memory/cron-state.json — has this skill been failing?

3. Generate 4 variations

Create 4 distinct improved versions of the SKILL.md, each with a different thesis:

Variation A — Better inputs: Improve data sources. Add alternative/complementary APIs, better search queries, more reliable endpoints. Fix any broken or deprecated sources found in step 2.

Variation B — Sharper output: Improve the output format and content quality. Make notifications more actionable, articles more substantive, analysis more insightful. Reduce noise, improve signal.

Variation C — More robust: Improve reliability and edge-case handling. Add fallback logic for when APIs fail, better deduplication, graceful handling of empty data, clearer error messages.

Variation D — Rethink: Take a fundamentally different approach to achieving the same goal. Different methodology, different angle, or a creative combination of techniques the original didn't consider.

Each variation must:

• Preserve the original frontmatter format (name, description, var, tags)
• Follow Aeon skill conventions (read memory, log to memory/logs/${today}.md, notify via ./notify)
• Be a complete, ready-to-run SKILL.md — no placeholders
• Include a one-line comment at the top of the body: <!-- autoresearch: variation X — thesis description -->

4. Evaluate and score

Score each variation on a 1-5 scale across these criteria:

Criterion	What to evaluate
Clarity	Will Claude execute this correctly? Are instructions unambiguous?
Data quality	Are sources reliable, diverse, and likely to return useful data?
Output value	Is the output actionable and worth reading? Low noise?
Robustness	Does it handle failures, empty data, and edge cases?
Conventions	Does it follow Aeon patterns? (memory, logging, notify, var usage)
Improvement	How much better is this than the original?

Write out your scoring with brief justification for each score. Calculate a weighted total:

• Improvement: 3x weight (the whole point)
• Output value: 2x weight
• Clarity, Data quality, Robustness: 1.5x weight each
• Conventions: 1x weight

5. Select and apply the winner

Pick the highest-scoring variation. If scores are very close (within 2 points total), prefer the variation that makes the biggest single improvement rather than small incremental changes.

Write the winning variation to skills/${var}/SKILL.md, replacing the original.

6. Create a PR

Create a branch named autoresearch/${var} and commit the change:

git checkout -b autoresearch/${var}
git add skills/${var}/SKILL.md
git commit -m "improve(${var}): autoresearch evolution

Variation chosen: [A/B/C/D] — [thesis]
Key changes: [1-2 sentence summary]"
git push -u origin autoresearch/${var}

Open a PR with:

• Title: improve(${var}): autoresearch evolution
• Body: Include the full scoring table, the winning variation's thesis, and a diff summary of what changed. Include all 4 variation summaries so the reviewer can see what was considered.

gh pr create --title "improve(${var}): autoresearch evolution" --body "..."

7. Notify and log

Send via ./notify:

*Autoresearch — ${var}*
Winner: Variation [X] — [thesis]
Score: [total]/50
Key changes: [summary]
PR: [url]

Log to memory/logs/${today}.md:

### autoresearch
- Target: ${var}
- Winner: Variation [X] ([score]/50)
- Thesis: [description]
- PR: [url]
- Runners-up: [brief scores]

Network note

There is no network sandbox — curl works, with WebFetch as the fallback for a flaky public GET. For an auth'd API, call ./secretcurl with a {ENV_NAME} placeholder (the key is injected via requires:), never a bare $SECRET.

Constraints

• Never downgrade a working skill. If all variations score lower than or equal to the original on "Improvement", skip the update and notify: "No improvement found for ${var} — all variations scored at baseline."
• Preserve the skill's core purpose — evolution, not replacement.
• Do not change the skill's tags or var semantics without strong justification.
• Do not add env vars that aren't already available in the workflow (check aeon.yml secrets).