本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開日本語紹介

agent-payment-x402

AIエージェントによる有料APIやサービスへの支払いをx402で組み込み、タスク別・セッション別の予算、送金先の制限、秘密鍵を自分で管理するウォレットを設定します。

原文原文の説明を見る

Add x402 payment execution to AI agents with per-task budgets, spending controls, and non-custodial wallets. Supports Base through agentwallet-sdk, X Layer through OKX Payments / OKX Agent Payments Protocol, and Solana plus multi-network EVM through the upstream x402 packages with facilitator-based settlement. Use when an agent must pay for something itself and needs per-task budgets, spending controls, and a non-custodial wallet.

インストール方法を見る

こんなときに便利

  • エージェントに有料APIを使わせたいとき
  • タスク別・セッション別の支出上限設定
  • 送金先・ネットワーク・資産の制限
  • APIにx402課金を組み込みたいとき

日本語での紹介

できること

AIエージェントが有料APIや外部サービスへ支払う仕組みを組み込みます。HTTPで料金の要求と支払いを扱うx402を使い、タスクごとの予算、セッション全体の上限、許可する送金先や取引頻度を設定します。Baseではagentwallet-sdk、X LayerではOKX Agent Payments Protocol、SolanaやEVM系ネットワークでは公式のx402パッケージを使う構成を案内します。API側で料金を受け取る実装も対象です。

こんなときに便利

エージェントに有料APIを利用させたい場合や、別のエージェントへの支払いに上限を設けたい場合に向いています。秘密鍵を自分で管理しながら、支払いの許可範囲を事前に定めたい開発者にも役立ちます。

使い方の例

  • 「有料APIを呼ぶエージェントに、タスク別の予算と送金先制限を設定して」
  • 「SolanaとBaseで支払いを受け付けるAPIの構成を考えて」

注意点

選ぶ構成に応じたSDK、秘密鍵、ネットワーク設定が必要です。支出ルールはエージェント自身ではなく、実行を管理する側で設定します。支払い前の承認とパッケージのバージョン固定を求めています。本番運用では最新の対応状況を確認し、支払いの検証・決済を担うfacilitatorを選びます。既定のx402.orgはテスト環境向けです。

この紹介文は、公開されている SKILL.md をもとに AI(Claude Haiku)が作成しました。正確な仕様は下の原文を確認してください。

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md26.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Agent Payment Execution (x402)

Enable AI agents to make policy-gated payments with built-in spending controls. Uses the x402 HTTP payment protocol and MCP tools so agents can pay for external services, APIs, or other agents without custodial risk.

When to Use

Use when: your agent needs to pay for an API call, purchase a service, settle with another agent, enforce per-task spending limits, or manage a non-custodial wallet. Pairs naturally with cost-aware-llm-pipeline and security-review skills.

Decision Tree

Choose the integration path based on whether your agent is buying access to a paid API or charging others for one:

NeedRecommended path
Agent pays a 402-gated API on Base or another agentwallet-supported chainUse agentwallet-sdk as an MCP payment server with strict spending policy
Agent pays a 402-gated API on X LayerUse OKX Agent Payments Protocol from okx/onchainos-skills; okx-x402-payment is a deprecated legacy alias
Agent pays a 402-gated API on Solana or another x402 v2 networkWrap the agent's HTTP client with the upstream @x402/fetch or @x402/axios package and register the EVM/SVM schemes; the resource server's facilitator verifies and settles
API charges agents on Solana or multiple networks (TypeScript, Python, or Go)Use the upstream x402 middleware from x402-foundation/x402 — @x402/express, @x402/hono, @x402/next, or @x402/fastify for TypeScript, x402 for Python, github.com/x402-foundation/x402/go/v2 for Go
TypeScript API charges agentsUse OKX Payments TypeScript seller SDK docs for Express, Hono, Fastify, or Next.js
Go API charges agentsUse OKX Payments Go seller SDK docs for Gin, Echo, or net/http
Rust API charges agentsUse OKX Payments Rust seller SDK docs for Axum
Java API charges agentsUse OKX Payments Java seller SDK docs for Spring Boot 2/3, Java EE, or Jakarta
Python API charges agentsCheck the current OKX Payments repository before implementation; a Python seller guide may not be available

Supported Networks

  • agentwallet-sdk: use the package docs to confirm current network coverage before production. Base Sepolia is the safest development default; Base mainnet is the production path called out by the original skill.
  • OKX Payments / X Layer: current seller docs target X Layer (eip155:196) and USDT0 settlement. Fetch current SDK docs before generating production code because payment packages and facilitator behavior can change quickly.
  • Upstream x402 packages: multi-network by design — one route can advertise Base and Solana simultaneously and let the buyer pick. The packages default to the x402.org facilitator, which is testnet-only (Base Sepolia eip155:84532, Solana devnet solana:EtWTRABZaYq6iMfeYKouRu166VU2xqa1, plus Stellar, Aptos, Hedera, and XRPL testnets) and is not intended for mainnet routes. For mainnet (solana:5eykt4UsFv8P8NJdTREpY1vzqKqZKvdp for Solana), either self-facilitate, run your own facilitator, or pick a hosted one from the upstream facilitator list — see the facilitator comparison under Option C. Confirm live coverage at the facilitator's /supported endpoint before production rather than hardcoding it here.

How It Works

x402 Protocol

x402 extends HTTP 402 (Payment Required) into a machine-negotiable flow. When a server returns 402, the agent's payment tool negotiates price, checks budget, signs a transaction, and retries only inside the policy and confirmation boundary set by the orchestrator.

Spending Controls

Every payment tool call enforces a SpendingPolicy:

  • Per-task budget — max spend for a single agent action
  • Per-session budget — cumulative limit across an entire session
  • Allowlisted recipients — restrict which addresses/services the agent can pay
  • Rate limits — max transactions per minute/hour

Non-Custodial Wallets

Agents hold their own keys via ERC-4337 smart accounts. The orchestrator sets policy before delegation; the agent can only spend within bounds. No pooled funds, no custodial risk.

MCP Integration

The payment layer exposes standard MCP tools that slot into any Claude Code or agent harness setup.

Security note: Always pin the package version. This tool manages private keys — unpinned npx installs introduce supply-chain risk.

Option A: agentwallet-sdk (Base / multi-chain)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agentpay": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["agentwallet-sdk@6.0.0"]
    }
  }
}

Available Tools (agent-callable)

ToolPurpose
get_balanceCheck agent wallet balance
send_paymentSend payment to address or ENS
check_spendingQuery remaining budget
list_transactionsAudit trail of all payments

Note: Spending policy is set by the orchestrator before delegating to the agent — not by the agent itself. This prevents agents from escalating their own spending limits. Configure policy via set_policy in your orchestration layer or pre-task hook, never as an agent-callable tool.

Option B: OKX Agent Payments Protocol (X Layer)

Use this path for X Layer x402, Multi-Party Payment (MPP), session payment, charge, and A2A charge flows.

For buyer-side agent flows:

  1. Install or reference the current okx/onchainos-skills repository.
  2. Use skills/okx-agent-payments-protocol/SKILL.md as the dispatcher.
  3. Treat skills/okx-x402-payment/SKILL.md as a deprecated compatibility alias, not as the canonical skill.
  4. Require explicit user confirmation before wallet status checks or payment actions. Do not hide payment execution behind a generic tool call.

For seller-side API flows, fetch the latest language-specific guide before generating code:

RuntimeCurrent guide
TypeScripthttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/okx/payments/main/typescript/SELLER.md
Gohttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/okx/payments/main/go/x402/SELLER.md
Rusthttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/okx/payments/main/rust/x402/SELLER.md
Javahttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/okx/payments/main/java/SELLER.md

Do not copy examples from older docs without checking the current OKX repository. Current OKX guidance uses okx-agent-payments-protocol as the dispatcher, and Java seller docs are now available.

Option C: Upstream x402 packages (Solana + Base/EVM)

Use this path when the agent pays — or your API charges — on Solana, Base, or another network the upstream protocol implementation supports. The canonical x402 monorepo at x402-foundation/x402 is actively maintained and publishes the client and middleware packages directly. Unlike Options A and B this is not a separate MCP server — you wrap the agent's own HTTP client, and a facilitator chosen by the resource server verifies and settles.

For buyer-side agent flows:

  1. Start from the maintained examples in examples/typescript/clients (fetch, axios, MCP) rather than copying snippets from older docs.

  2. Require explicit user confirmation before signing or submitting the first paid request, exactly as Option B requires for OKX flows. Do not hide payment execution behind a generic tool call.

  3. Pin package versions (for example @x402/fetch@2.22.0); all upstream packages version in lockstep.

  4. Enforce your budget with a PaymentPolicy registered on the client, so the check runs against the server's actual challenge on every call. A budget compared against a number you passed in yourself proves nothing — the amount, asset, and network all come from the server, so all three must be validated before a signature exists.

  5. Configure an exact resource-origin allowlist separately from recipient and budget policy. All payment-enabled fetches below refuse redirects. Session approval names the approved origins, networks, assets, recipients, and human-unit spending caps; concurrent calls share one decision. Keep this client and its policy private to the orchestrator.

import { x402Client, wrapFetchWithPayment } from "@x402/fetch";
import { ExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { ExactSvmScheme } from "@x402/svm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
import { createKeyPairSignerFromBytes } from "@solana/kit";
import { base58 } from "@scure/base";

// Signer keys belong to the ORCHESTRATOR's env — never hardcoded, never agent-writable.
const evmKey = process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY as `0x${string}`;
const svmKey = process.env.SVM_PRIVATE_KEY;
if (!evmKey || !svmKey) {
  throw new Error("Signer keys are not set — refusing to start payment client");
}

// One client, both network families: the buyer pays whichever chain the 402 offers.
const client = new x402Client();
client.register("eip155:*", new ExactEvmScheme(privateKeyToAccount(evmKey)));
client.register("solana:*", new ExactSvmScheme(await createKeyPairSignerFromBytes(base58.decode(svmKey))));

// A PaymentPolicy filters the SERVER's payment requirements before any
// signature is created. Returning an empty array means "nothing here is
// acceptable" and the client refuses to pay rather than falling back.
const ALLOWED_NETWORKS = new Set([
  "solana:5eykt4UsFv8P8NJdTREpY1vzqKqZKvdp",      // Solana mainnet
  "eip155:8453",                                   // Base
]);
const MAX_AMOUNT = 10_000n;      // atomic units, 6-decimal USDC: 0.01 USDC per call
const SESSION_CAP = 50_000n;     // 0.05 USDC across the whole session

// EVM addresses are case-insensitive, so compare them lowercased. Solana
// addresses are base58 and ARE case-sensitive — never lowercase those, or a
// different account could slip through.
const normalizeAddress = (a: string) => (a.startsWith("0x") ? a.toLowerCase() : a);
const ALLOWED_ASSETS = new Set(
  [
    "EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v",  // USDC, Solana mainnet
    "0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913",    // USDC, Base
  ].map(normalizeAddress),
);
// Who you are willing to pay. Without this, any 402 an agent happens to hit
// can name its own recipient.
const ALLOWED_PAY_TO = new Set(
  ["7pr7NCaQRz5PEhPy7BAeB3Z72TVkiShhjRyVCN5DA6yC"].map(normalizeAddress),
);

client.registerPolicy((_x402Version, requirements) =>
  requirements.filter(r => {
    if (!ALLOWED_NETWORKS.has(r.network)) return false;                   // wrong chain
    if (!ALLOWED_ASSETS.has(normalizeAddress(r.asset))) return false;     // wrong token
    if (!ALLOWED_PAY_TO.has(normalizeAddress(r.payTo))) return false;     // wrong recipient
    try {
      const amount = BigInt(r.amount);
      return amount >= 0n && amount <= MAX_AMOUNT;                        // over budget / negative
    } catch {
      return false;                                                       // unparseable amount
    }
  }),
);

// The policy sees one challenge at a time, so it cannot enforce a session
// total or ask a human anything. Keep the payment-enabled client private and
// route every paid call through the payOnce boundary below.

// Supply this from your harness — a real prompt, never a stub that returns true.
declare function confirmWithUser(prompt: string): Promise<boolean>;

// Resource authorization is independent of recipient and budget policy.
// The ORCHESTRATOR supplies exact approved HTTPS origins before delegation;
// never populate this set from a server challenge or agent-controlled input.
const ALLOWED_ORIGINS = new Set(["https://api.example.com"]);
function requireAllowedOrigin(url: string): void {
  const parsed = new URL(url);
  if (!ALLOWED_ORIGINS.has(parsed.origin) || parsed.username || parsed.password) {
    throw new Error("Resource origin is not authorized");
  }
}

// Both approved assets above are 6-decimal USDC. Update this trusted formatting
// policy along with the asset allowlist if you support other assets/decimals.
const USDC_SCALE = 1_000_000n;
const humanUSDC = (amount: bigint) =>
  `${amount / USDC_SCALE}.${(amount % USDC_SCALE).toString().padStart(6, "0").replace(/0+$/, "") || "0"} USDC`;

let sessionSpent = 0n;
let sessionApproval: Promise<boolean> | undefined;

async function payOnce(url: string, init?: RequestInit): Promise<Response> {
  requireAllowedOrigin(url); // Before reservation, prompt, fetch, or signature.
  // Reserve the worst case the policy allows. Settlement responses do not
  // carry an amount, so counting MAX_AMOUNT per call is a deliberate
  // over-estimate — it can stop early, never late. Reserve before any await,
  // so concurrent calls cannot all pass the check.
  if (sessionSpent + MAX_AMOUNT > SESSION_CAP) {
    throw new Error("Session budget exhausted — blocked");
  }
  sessionSpent += MAX_AMOUNT;
  // Release the reservation only when no signed payment left this process:
  // a declined or failed prompt, a challenge the policy rejected, or a free
  // response. Once a signed request is sent it may settle, so keep it counted.
  let signedRequestSent = false;
  const trackingFetch: typeof fetch = async (input, reqInit) => {
    // Override caller options on BOTH the challenge and signed retry. Native
    // fetch refuses redirects, so an unauthorized host cannot return a 402
    // or receive a payment header via an automatic redirect.
    const req = new Request(input, { ...reqInit, redirect: "error" });
    requireAllowedOrigin(req.url);
    if (req.headers.has("PAYMENT-SIGNATURE") || req.headers.has("X-PAYMENT")) {
      signedRequestSent = true;
    }
    const response = await fetch(req);
    // Also fail closed for adapters that expose a redirect response instead.
    if (response.redirected || (response.status >= 300 && response.status < 400)) {
      throw new Error("Paid request redirects are blocked");
    }
    return response;
  };
  try {
    // Install one promise before awaiting the prompt. Concurrent calls share
    // the same decision, including a decline or failure; never auto-reprompt.
    sessionApproval ??= Promise.resolve().then(() => confirmWithUser(
      `Allow paid requests to origins: ${[...ALLOWED_ORIGINS].join(", ")}? ` +
      `Networks: ${[...ALLOWED_NETWORKS].join(", ")}. ` +
      `Assets: ${[...ALLOWED_ASSETS].join(", ")} (6-decimal USDC). ` +
      `Recipients (payTo): ${[...ALLOWED_PAY_TO].join(", ")}. ` +
      `Per-call cap: ${humanUSDC(MAX_AMOUNT)}; session cap: ${humanUSDC(SESSION_CAP)}.`,
    ));
    if (!await sessionApproval) {
      throw new Error("User declined: no payment attempted");
    }
    return await wrapFetchWithPayment(trackingFetch, client)(url, init);
  } finally {
    if (!signedRequestSent) sessionSpent -= MAX_AMOUNT;
  }
}

const res = await payOnce("https://api.example.com/data", { method: "GET" });

With the policy registered, an over-budget amount, an unexpected token, or an unregistered chain all fail closed — createPaymentPayload throws instead of signing, because every candidate was filtered out. Devnet USDC is 4zMMC9srt5Ri5X14GAgXhaHii3GnPAEERYPJgZJDncDU; add it to ALLOWED_ASSETS only for development. Test the policy adversarially — feed it a challenge demanding 5000000 atomic units, one quoting a different mint, and one on a chain you never registered, and assert that none of them produce a signature. In the exact-SVM scheme the facilitator is the transaction fee payer, so the buyer wallet holds USDC only — no SOL for gas.

Facilitator choice. A facilitator verifies and settles on the resource server's behalf, so this is the resource server's decision, not the buyer's. In rough order of least to most trust delegated:

OptionWhen it fits
Self-facilitate in-processYou want no third party in the settlement path and can hold keys and RPC access yourself
Run your own facilitatorYou want that same control but shared across several services
x402.org facilitatorDevelopment and testnets — it is the package default, requires no setup, and upstream documents it as not intended for mainnet routes
A hosted production facilitatorYou want mainnet coverage without operating infrastructure

For the hosted option, choose from the facilitator list in the upstream docs rather than a name copied from here — it is maintained, it is not exhaustive, and coverage changes. As of writing it includes Coinbase's CDP (KYT/OFAC screening on every transaction), PayAI, Corbits, Dexter, Solvador, and others; several cover Solana mainnet alongside EVM. Whichever you pick, confirm live coverage at its /supported endpoint before production and re-check when you add a network.

Disclosure: this section was contributed by someone who works on PayAI, one of the listed facilitators. It is included as one option among several, and the self-hosted and upstream-default paths above are deliberately listed first.

Seller side (API charges agents). Use the upstream middleware; one route can advertise Base and Solana simultaneously (see examples/typescript/servers for runnable versions):

RuntimePackage
Express / Hono / Next.js / Fastify@x402/express@2.22.0, @x402/hono@2.22.0, @x402/next@2.22.0, @x402/fastify@2.22.0
Python (FastAPI, Flask)x402 on PyPI
Go (Gin, Echo, net/http)github.com/x402-foundation/x402/go/v2

Solana sellers: the payTo address needs its canonical token account first. The exact-SVM client derives the associated token account (ATA) for payTo with findAssociatedTokenPda and transfers there; it never creates it. If that exact account is missing, settlement fails at simulation and the 402 comes back with transaction_simulation_failed, which reads like a client bug rather than a missing recipient account. Check the derived address itself — scanning the owner's token accounts is not equivalent, because a non-canonical auxiliary account for the same mint would pass while the ATA the client targets is still absent:

import { findAssociatedTokenPda, TOKEN_PROGRAM_ADDRESS } from "@solana-program/token";

const [ata] = await findAssociatedTokenPda({
  mint: "EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v",   // USDC mainnet
  owner: payToAddress,
  tokenProgram: TOKEN_PROGRAM_ADDRESS,                     // TOKEN_2022_PROGRAM_ADDRESS for Token-2022 mints
});

Then confirm that exact address exists — value: null means it does not, and settlement to it will fail:

curl -s https://api.mainnet-beta.solana.com -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"getAccountInfo",
       "params":["<DERIVED_ATA>",{"encoding":"base64"}]}' \
  | jq '.result.value != null'

To provision it (whoever creates it pays the small rent, not the payer):

  • In code, add getCreateAssociatedTokenIdempotentInstruction from @solana-program/token to your onboarding flow — the idempotent variant is safe to re-run and is the only option that is deterministic.
  • spl-token create-account <MINT> --owner <PAYTO_ADDRESS> with the spl-token CLI.
  • A transfer of that token to payTo also works, but only when the sender includes the create instruction — wallets and spl-token transfer --fund-recipient do; a bare transferChecked to a missing ATA fails the same way settlement does.

This bites hardest when payouts go to freshly provisioned or custodial wallets, which often have no ATA for the asset yet.

Discovery. Facilitators that implement the x402 bazaar extension expose a /discovery/resources endpoint — query the CDP catalog at https://api.cdp.coinbase.com/platform/v2/x402/discovery/resources and the PayAI catalog at https://facilitator.payai.network/discovery/resources. For Solana-payable services there is also pay.sh, the Solana Foundation's curated catalog.

Examples

Budget enforcement in an MCP client

When building an orchestrator that calls the agentpay MCP server, enforce budgets before dispatching paid tool calls.

Prerequisites: Install the package before adding the MCP config — npx without -y will prompt for confirmation in non-interactive environments, causing the server to hang: npm install -g agentwallet-sdk@6.0.0

import { Client } from "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/client/index.js";
import { StdioClientTransport } from "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/client/stdio.js";

async function main() {
  // 1. Validate credentials before constructing the transport.
  //    A missing key must fail immediately — never let the subprocess start without auth.
  const walletKey = process.env.WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY;
  if (!walletKey) {
    throw new Error("WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY is not set — refusing to start payment server");
  }

  // Connect to the agentpay MCP server via stdio transport.
  // Whitelist only the env vars the server needs — never forward all of process.env
  // to a third-party subprocess that manages private keys.
  const transport = new StdioClientTransport({
    command: "npx",
    args: ["agentwallet-sdk@6.0.0"],
    env: {
      PATH: process.env.PATH ?? "",
      NODE_ENV: process.env.NODE_ENV ?? "production",
      WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY: walletKey,
    },
  });
  const agentpay = new Client({ name: "orchestrator", version: "1.0.0" });
  await agentpay.connect(transport);

  // 2. Set spending policy before delegating to the agent.
  //    Always verify success — a silent failure means no controls are active.
  const policyResult = await agentpay.callTool({
    name: "set_policy",
    arguments: {
      per_task_budget: 0.50,
      per_session_budget: 5.00,
      allowlisted_recipients: ["api.example.com"],
    },
  });
  if (policyResult.isError) {
    throw new Error(
      `Failed to set spending policy — do not delegate: ${JSON.stringify(policyResult.content)}`
    );
  }

  // 3. Use preToolCheck before any paid action
  await preToolCheck(agentpay, 0.01);
}

// Pre-tool hook: fail-closed budget enforcement with four distinct error paths.
async function preToolCheck(agentpay: Client, apiCost: number): Promise<void> {
  // Path 1: Reject invalid input (NaN/Infinity bypass the < comparison)
  if (!Number.isFinite(apiCost) || apiCost < 0) {
    throw new Error(`Invalid apiCost: ${apiCost} — action blocked`);
  }

  // Path 2: Transport/connectivity failure
  let result;
  try {
    result = await agentpay.callTool({ name: "check_spending" });
  } catch (err) {
    throw new Error(`Payment service unreachable — action blocked: ${err}`);
  }

  // Path 3: Tool returned an error (e.g., auth failure, wallet not initialised)
  if (result.isError) {
    throw new Error(
      `check_spending failed — action blocked: ${JSON.stringify(result.content)}`
    );
  }

  // Path 4: Parse and validate the response shape
  let remaining: number;
  try {
    const parsed = JSON.parse(
      (result.content as Array<{ text: string }>)[0].text
    );
    if (!Number.isFinite(parsed?.remaining)) {
      throw new TypeError("missing or non-finite 'remaining' field");
    }
    remaining = parsed.remaining;
  } catch (err) {
    throw new Error(
      `check_spending returned unexpected format — action blocked: ${err}`
    );
  }

  // Path 5: Budget exceeded
  if (remaining < apiCost) {
    throw new Error(
      `Budget exceeded: need $${apiCost} but only $${remaining} remaining`
    );
  }
}

main().catch((err) => {
  console.error(err);
  process.exitCode = 1;
});

Best Practices

  • Set budgets before delegation: When spawning sub-agents, attach a SpendingPolicy via your orchestration layer. Never give an agent unlimited spend.
  • Pin your dependencies: Always specify an exact version in your MCP config (e.g., agentwallet-sdk@6.0.0). Verify package integrity before deploying to production.
  • Audit trails: Use list_transactions in post-task hooks to log what was spent and why.
  • Fail closed: If the payment tool is unreachable, block the paid action — don't fall back to unmetered access.
  • Pair with security-review: Payment tools are high-privilege. Apply the same scrutiny as shell access.
  • Test with testnets first: Use Base Sepolia for development; switch to Base mainnet for production. On Solana, develop against Solana devnet (solana:EtWTRABZaYq6iMfeYKouRu166VU2xqa1) and the free x402.org facilitator before moving to a production facilitator on mainnet.
  • On Solana, fund USDC not SOL: The exact-SVM scheme makes the facilitator the transaction fee payer, so a SOL-less wallet still pays. Verify each challenge's asset against the expected USDC mint (mainnet EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v, devnet 4zMMC9srt5Ri5X14GAgXhaHii3GnPAEERYPJgZJDncDU) before signing — a wrapped client that pays any asset is a hole in your budget.

Production Reference

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

accessibility

無料日本語概要

Web・iOS・Androidの画面を、読み上げやキーボード操作に対応させ、ラベル、配色、操作対象の大きさなどをWCAG 2.2に沿って設計・点検するスキル。

  • アイコンボタンの説明を付けたいとき
  • キーボード操作とモーダルの点検
  • コントラストや操作対象の大きさの確認
affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月12日 更新

agent-architecture-audit

無料日本語概要

AIエージェントの不調を、指示・記憶・ツール実行・画面表示など12の層から調べるスキル。コードやログを根拠に原因を整理し、重要度順の指摘と修正案をまとめます。

  • アプリ内だけで起きる不調を調べたいとき
  • 過去の会話が混ざる原因を調査
  • ツールの未実行や実行の誤報を確認
affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月12日 更新

agent-eval

無料日本語概要

実際の開発課題で複数のコーディングエージェントを比較するスキル。成功率、取得可能なAPI費用、所要時間、繰り返し実行の安定性を測り、選定や更新後の評価に使えます。

  • 実際の開発課題でエージェントを比較
  • 新しいツールやモデルの導入前評価
  • エージェント更新後の性能確認
affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月12日 更新

agent-harness-construction

無料日本語概要

AIエージェントが使うツールの種類や入出力、エラーからの復帰手順を設計・見直します。文脈の情報量も整理し、作業完了率や再試行回数で改善を評価します。

  • エージェントのツールや入力形式の設計
  • ツールの結果と次の行動を明確にしたいとき
  • 安全な再試行と停止条件を定めたいとき
affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月12日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

無料日本語概要

AIエージェントが失敗や同じ操作を繰り返す原因を、エラーと実行状況から整理します。小さな復旧操作を試し、結果と根拠を引き継げる報告にまとめるスキルです。

  • エージェントの連続失敗を診断したいとき
  • 同じツール操作のループ調査
  • 情報の蓄積による出力劣化の点検
affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月5日 更新

agent-introspection-debugging

無料日本語概要

AIエージェントの失敗や同じ操作の繰り返しを記録し、原因の切り分け、小さな復旧操作、結果の報告まで進める手順を示して、根拠のある再試行につなげるスキル。

  • 同じツール操作を繰り返す原因の調査
  • 会話の肥大化による品質低下の調査
  • ファイルパスや環境の食い違いの確認
affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月12日 更新

affaan-m のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する