本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

benchmark-optimization-loop

Convert 'make it faster' requests into a bounded measured optimization loop — baseline first, generate one-hypothesis variants, benchmark each against a correctness gate, and promote the fastest safe variant with reproducible commands. Use when asked to speed something up, try many variants, run recursive optimization, benchmark latency/throughput/cost, or pick the best implementation by repeated measured tests.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Benchmark Optimization Loop

Use this skill to convert "make it 20x faster" or "try 50 recursive optimizations" into a bounded measured loop that can actually improve a system.

Required Baseline

Do not optimize until these exist:

  • the operation being optimized;
  • the correctness gate that must stay green;
  • the metric: wall time, p95 latency, rows/sec, cost/run, memory, error rate;
  • the current baseline;
  • the search budget: max variants, max time, max spend, max data impact.

If the user asks for an unrealistic target, keep the ambition but make the loop bounded and measurable.

Loop

  1. Measure the baseline.
  2. Identify bottlenecks from evidence.
  3. Generate variants that test one hypothesis each.
  4. Run variants with the same input shape.
  5. Reject variants that fail correctness, safety, or reproducibility.
  6. Promote the fastest safe variant.
  7. Codify the winning path in a script, command, test, config, or doc.
  8. Rerun the baseline and winner to confirm the delta.

Variant Table

Track variants like this:

Variant | Hypothesis | Command | Time | Correct? | Notes
baseline | current path | npm run job | 120s | yes | stable
batch-500 | fewer round trips | npm run job -- --batch 500 | 42s | yes | winner
parallel-8 | more workers | npm run job -- --workers 8 | 31s | no | rate limited

Recursive Search

For recursive or hyperparameter work:

  • persist every run to a ledger;
  • compare against the prior accepted winner, not only the previous run;
  • keep a holdout or replay check;
  • stop when improvement is within noise, correctness fails, cost exceeds the budget, or the search starts changing more variables than it can explain.

Use phrases like "best measured safe variant" instead of "global optimum" unless the search space was actually exhaustive.

Promotion Gate

A variant cannot become the new default until:

  • correctness tests pass;
  • the performance delta is repeated or explained;
  • rollback is obvious;
  • the change is encoded in source control or a durable runbook;
  • the final summary includes exact commands and measurements.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design, implement, and audit accessible UI to WCAG 2.2 Level AA across Web, iOS, and Android — semantic ARIA roles and labels, accessibility traits and hints, focus management, contrast, target size, and screen-reader support. Use when building or auditing UI for accessibility compliance, keyboard navigation, or screen-reader support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Full-stack diagnostic for agent and LLM applications. Audits the 12-layer agent stack for wrapper regression, memory pollution, tool discipline failures, hidden repair loops, and rendering corruption. Produces severity-ranked findings with code-first fixes. Essential for developers building agent applications, autonomous loops, or any LLM-powered feature. Use when an agent or LLM feature misbehaves and the failing layer is unknown, or before shipping an agent stack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics. Use when choosing between coding agents, or when a change to an agent setup needs measured pass rate, cost, and time rather than an impression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates. Use when defining or revising an agent's tool set, action space, or observation format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports. Use when an agent run fails and you need a reproducible diagnosis instead of a retry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports. Use when an agent run fails and you need a reproducible diagnosis instead of a retry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月5日 更新

affaan-m のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する