本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

content-engine

Create platform-native content systems for X, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube, newsletters, and repurposed multi-platform campaigns. Use when the user wants social posts, threads, scripts, content calendars, or one source asset adapted cleanly across platforms.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Content Engine

Build platform-native content without flattening the author's real voice into platform slop.

When to Activate

  • writing X posts or threads
  • drafting LinkedIn posts or launch updates
  • scripting short-form video or YouTube explainers
  • repurposing articles, podcasts, demos, docs, or internal notes into public content
  • building a launch sequence or ongoing content system around a product, insight, or narrative

Non-Negotiables

  1. Start from source material, not generic post formulas.
  2. Adapt the format for the platform, not the persona.
  3. One post should carry one actual claim.
  4. Specificity beats adjectives.
  5. No engagement bait unless the user explicitly asks for it.

Source-First Workflow

Before drafting, identify the source set:

  • published articles
  • notes or internal memos
  • product demos
  • docs or changelogs
  • transcripts
  • screenshots
  • prior posts from the same author

If the user wants a specific voice, build a voice profile from real examples before writing. Use brand-voice as the canonical workflow when voice consistency matters across more than one output.

Voice Handling

brand-voice is the canonical voice layer.

Run it first when:

  • there are multiple downstream outputs
  • the user explicitly cares about writing style
  • the content is launch, outreach, or reputation-sensitive

Reuse the resulting VOICE PROFILE here instead of rebuilding a second voice model. If the user wants Affaan / ECC voice specifically, still treat brand-voice as the source of truth and feed it the best live or source-derived material available.

Hard Bans

Delete and rewrite any of these:

  • "In today's rapidly evolving landscape"
  • "game-changer", "revolutionary", "cutting-edge"
  • "here's why this matters" unless it is followed immediately by something concrete
  • ending with a LinkedIn-style question just to farm replies
  • forced casualness on LinkedIn
  • fake engagement padding that was not present in the source material

Platform Adaptation Rules

X

  • open with the strongest claim, artifact, or tension
  • keep the compression if the source voice is compressed
  • if writing a thread, each post must advance the argument
  • do not pad with context the audience does not need

LinkedIn

  • expand only enough for people outside the immediate niche to follow
  • do not turn it into a fake lesson post unless the source material actually is reflective
  • no corporate inspiration cadence
  • no praise-stacking, no "journey" filler

Short Video

  • script around the visual sequence and proof points
  • first seconds should show the result, problem, or punch
  • do not write narration that sounds better on paper than on screen

YouTube

  • show the result or tension early
  • organize by argument or progression, not filler sections
  • use chaptering only when it helps clarity

Newsletter

  • open with the point, conflict, or artifact
  • do not spend the first paragraph warming up
  • every section needs to add something new

Repurposing Flow

  1. Pick the anchor asset.
  2. Extract 3 to 7 atomic claims or scenes.
  3. Rank them by sharpness, novelty, and proof.
  4. Assign one strong idea per output.
  5. Adapt structure for each platform.
  6. Strip platform-shaped filler.
  7. Run the quality gate.

Deliverables

When asked for a campaign, return:

  • a short voice profile if voice matching matters
  • the core angle
  • platform-native drafts
  • posting order only if it helps execution
  • gaps that must be filled before publishing

Quality Gate

Before delivering:

  • every draft sounds like the intended author, not the platform stereotype
  • every draft contains a real claim, proof point, or concrete observation
  • no generic hype language remains
  • no fake engagement bait remains
  • no duplicated copy across platforms unless requested
  • any CTA is earned and user-approved

Related Skills

  • brand-voice for source-derived voice profiles
  • crosspost for platform-specific distribution
  • x-api for sourcing recent posts and publishing approved X output

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design, implement, and audit accessible UI to WCAG 2.2 Level AA across Web, iOS, and Android — semantic ARIA roles and labels, accessibility traits and hints, focus management, contrast, target size, and screen-reader support. Use when building or auditing UI for accessibility compliance, keyboard navigation, or screen-reader support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Full-stack diagnostic for agent and LLM applications. Audits the 12-layer agent stack for wrapper regression, memory pollution, tool discipline failures, hidden repair loops, and rendering corruption. Produces severity-ranked findings with code-first fixes. Essential for developers building agent applications, autonomous loops, or any LLM-powered feature. Use when an agent or LLM feature misbehaves and the failing layer is unknown, or before shipping an agent stack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics. Use when choosing between coding agents, or when a change to an agent setup needs measured pass rate, cost, and time rather than an impression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates. Use when defining or revising an agent's tool set, action space, or observation format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports. Use when an agent run fails and you need a reproducible diagnosis instead of a retry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports. Use when an agent run fails and you need a reproducible diagnosis instead of a retry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月5日 更新

affaan-m のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する