本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

frontend-design-direction

Set an ECC-specific frontend design direction for production UI work. Use when building or improving websites, dashboards, applications, components, landing pages, visual tools, or any web UI that needs stronger product-specific design judgment.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Frontend Design Direction

Use this skill when the work is not just making UI function, but making it feel purposeful, polished, and appropriate to the product domain.

Source: salvaged from stale community PR #1659 by linus707.

Note: ECC intentionally does not rebundle the canonical Anthropic frontend-design skill. Install that from anthropics/skills when you want the official upstream skill. This skill is the ECC-specific design-direction salvage of the useful local guidance from #1659.

When to Use

  • The user asks to build a web page, app, dashboard, artifact, component, or UI.
  • The user asks to make an interface more polished, distinctive, beautiful, or less generic.
  • The implementation needs visual hierarchy, typography, color, motion, layout, and interaction choices.
  • The current UI works but reads as flat, generic, templated, or mismatched to the audience.

Design Direction

Before coding, choose a specific direction:

  1. Purpose: what job does the interface do?
  2. Audience: who repeats this workflow, and what do they need to scan first?
  3. Tone: utilitarian, editorial, playful, industrial, refined, technical, maximal, minimal, dense, calm, or another explicit direction.
  4. Memorable detail: one design idea that makes the result feel intentional.
  5. Constraints: framework, accessibility, performance, responsiveness, and existing design system.

Match the direction to the domain. A SaaS operations tool should usually be dense, quiet, and scannable. A portfolio, launch page, game, or editorial piece can be more expressive. Do not force a landing-page composition onto a tool that needs repeated daily use.

Implementation Guidance

  • Build the actual usable experience as the first screen unless the user explicitly asks for marketing copy.
  • Use existing project components, tokens, icon libraries, and routing patterns before introducing a new visual system.
  • Use real or generated visual assets when the interface depends on images, products, places, people, gameplay, charts, or inspectable media.
  • Prefer contextual typography and spacing over generic oversized hero text.
  • Keep palettes multi-dimensional: avoid a UI dominated by one hue family.
  • Use CSS variables or existing design tokens so the direction remains coherent across states.
  • Design responsive constraints explicitly: grids, aspect ratios, min/max sizes, stable toolbars, and fixed-format controls should not shift when labels or hover states appear.
  • Use motion sparingly but deliberately. Prefer high-signal transitions that clarify state over decorative animation.
  • Verify text fit on mobile and desktop. Long labels must wrap or resize cleanly rather than overflowing.

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not default to common generated patterns: purple gradients, decorative blobs, oversized cards, vague hero copy, or stock-like atmospheric media.
  • Do not add UI cards inside other cards.
  • Do not use a single decorative style everywhere when the domain calls for restraint.
  • Do not hide the primary product, tool, object, or workflow behind generic marketing sections.
  • Do not add a new dependency for a design flourish unless it clearly pays for itself.
  • Do not describe the UI's features inside the UI when the controls can speak for themselves.

Review Checklist

  • The first viewport immediately communicates the product, workflow, or object.
  • The visual hierarchy supports scanning and repeated use.
  • Typography fits the container and does not overlap adjacent content.
  • Color choices have contrast and do not collapse into a one-note palette.
  • Icons are used for familiar tool actions where available.
  • Responsive layout has stable dimensions for boards, grids, toolbars, controls, tiles, and counters.
  • Assets render and carry the subject matter instead of acting as filler.
  • Motion improves orientation and does not mask sluggishness.
  • The result matches the repo's existing frontend conventions unless there is a clear reason to depart.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design, implement, and audit accessible UI to WCAG 2.2 Level AA across Web, iOS, and Android — semantic ARIA roles and labels, accessibility traits and hints, focus management, contrast, target size, and screen-reader support. Use when building or auditing UI for accessibility compliance, keyboard navigation, or screen-reader support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Full-stack diagnostic for agent and LLM applications. Audits the 12-layer agent stack for wrapper regression, memory pollution, tool discipline failures, hidden repair loops, and rendering corruption. Produces severity-ranked findings with code-first fixes. Essential for developers building agent applications, autonomous loops, or any LLM-powered feature. Use when an agent or LLM feature misbehaves and the failing layer is unknown, or before shipping an agent stack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics. Use when choosing between coding agents, or when a change to an agent setup needs measured pass rate, cost, and time rather than an impression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates. Use when defining or revising an agent's tool set, action space, or observation format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports. Use when an agent run fails and you need a reproducible diagnosis instead of a retry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports. Use when an agent run fails and you need a reproducible diagnosis instead of a retry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月5日 更新

affaan-m のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する