本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

latency-critical-systems

Optimize and verify latency-sensitive systems — realtime dashboards, market data feeds, streaming agents, execution gateways, queues, and caches — by tracking p50/p95/p99 latency, freshness age, and queue depth, mapping hot paths, and running live readbacks. Use when p95 latency, throughput, or data freshness matters.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Latency Critical Systems

Use this skill when the user cares about realtime behavior, hot paths, streaming freshness, or execution speed. This includes HFT-like infrastructure, but the skill is engineering-focused. It does not authorize live trading or financial advice.

Split The Metrics

Do not collapse everything into "fast." Track:

  • p50, p95, and p99 latency;
  • throughput;
  • freshness age;
  • queue depth;
  • cache hit rate;
  • provider/API response time;
  • browser render time;
  • correctness under load;
  • failure and retry behavior.

Map The Hot Path

Write the path from user/event to final visible state:

source event -> provider API -> ingest worker -> queue -> cache -> edge route
-> client stream -> browser render -> user-visible state

Then measure each segment separately.

Optimization Order

  1. Remove unnecessary round trips.
  2. Cache stable reads with freshness metadata.
  3. Batch small calls and writes.
  4. Move compute closer to the data or the user.
  5. Split hot and cold paths.
  6. Apply backpressure before queues grow unbounded.
  7. Use streaming only when it improves freshness or user experience.
  8. Add canaries for stale data, degraded providers, and bad cache state.

Verification

Use live readbacks when a deployed surface exists:

  • HTTP timing and response headers;
  • provider freshness timestamp;
  • queue or job state;
  • edge/cache state;
  • browser verification for actual UI freshness;
  • logs around retries and degraded mode.

For market-data or execution-adjacent paths, also verify orderbook age, VWAP assumptions, provider status, and kill-switch behavior before calling the path ready.

Guardrails

  • Do not optimize latency by dropping required validation.
  • Do not hide stale data behind fast cache hits.
  • Do not claim millisecond behavior from client labels without measurement.
  • Do not run live orders, destructive migrations, or customer-impacting deploys without an explicit approval gate.
  • Keep secrets and private payloads out of logs and benchmark artifacts.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design, implement, and audit accessible UI to WCAG 2.2 Level AA across Web, iOS, and Android — semantic ARIA roles and labels, accessibility traits and hints, focus management, contrast, target size, and screen-reader support. Use when building or auditing UI for accessibility compliance, keyboard navigation, or screen-reader support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Full-stack diagnostic for agent and LLM applications. Audits the 12-layer agent stack for wrapper regression, memory pollution, tool discipline failures, hidden repair loops, and rendering corruption. Produces severity-ranked findings with code-first fixes. Essential for developers building agent applications, autonomous loops, or any LLM-powered feature. Use when an agent or LLM feature misbehaves and the failing layer is unknown, or before shipping an agent stack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics. Use when choosing between coding agents, or when a change to an agent setup needs measured pass rate, cost, and time rather than an impression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates. Use when defining or revising an agent's tool set, action space, or observation format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports. Use when an agent run fails and you need a reproducible diagnosis instead of a retry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月10日 更新

Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports. Use when an agent run fails and you need a reproducible diagnosis instead of a retry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

affaan-m/ECC27.7万2026年10月5日 更新

affaan-m のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する