007
無料Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deeply validating an ADR's format, approval chain, linkage to standards, or deciding the correct ADR status
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Use this skill when:
An ADR MUST be created for:
If uncertain whether an ADR is needed: create one. The cost is low; the cost of undocumented decisions is high.
.specs/decisions/.ADR-XXXX-<kebab-case-title>.md
ADR-0012-adopt-event-sourcing-for-audit-trail.mdEvery ADR MUST contain all of the following sections:
# ADR-XXXX — [Short Title]
**Status:** Draft | Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded by ADR-XXXX
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Authors:** [name(s)]
**Approved by:** [name(s)] (required before Accepted status)
Draft → Proposed → Accepted
↘ Deprecated
↘ Superseded by ADR-XXXX
Draft — work in progress, not yet reviewable.Proposed — ready for review; must not be implemented until Accepted.Accepted — approved by authorized owner; implementation may proceed.Deprecated — decision is no longer in effect; superseding context must be explained.Superseded — replaced by a newer ADR; reference to successor MUST be included.Accepted.Supersedes: ADR-XXXX.When generating an ADR draft, use this structure:
# ADR-XXXX — [Short Title]
**Status:** Draft
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Authors:** [name]
**Approved by:** —
---
## Context
[Describe the problem or situation requiring a decision.]
## Decision
[State clearly what has been decided.]
## Alternatives Considered
### Option A — [Name]
- **Description:** ...
- **Pros:** ...
- **Cons:** ...
- **Rejected because:** ...
### Option B — Do Nothing
- **Description:** Maintain current approach.
- **Pros:** No disruption.
- **Cons:** [Why this is insufficient.]
- **Rejected because:** ...
## Consequences
### Positive
- ...
### Negative / Trade-offs
- ...
### Risks & Mitigations
- **Risk:** ... **Mitigation:** ...
## Affected Standards
- [Standard name] — [Section/rule affected]
✅ Good: ADR-0007 with all sections, alternatives, explicit risks, approved by Platform Architect. ✅ Good: ADR that supersedes ADR-0003 and clearly explains why the old decision is no longer valid.
❌ Bad: ADR with only Context and Decision sections — missing Alternatives and Consequences.
❌ Bad: ADR in Accepted status with no approver listed.
❌ Bad: Implementation proceeding while ADR is still in Draft status.
For low-context activation, load .enterprise/governance/agent-skills/adr-compliance/SKILL-QUICK.md or QUICK.md first. Load this full skill for deep analysis, violation fixing, or formal review gates.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides the creation of agile user stories and Gherkin feature files. Use when the user wants to create a user story, write acceptance criteria, define Gherkin scenarios, or author BDD feature files. This should trigger for requests such as Create a user story; Write a user story; I need to write a user story. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitates conversational discovery to create Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) for non-functional requirements using the ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality model. Use when the user wants to document quality attributes, NFR decisions, security/performance/scalability architecture, or design systems with measurable quality criteria. This should trigger for requests such as Create ADR for Non-functional requirements; Document Non-functional requirements; Capture Non-functional requirements; Generate Non-functional requirements in an ADR. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a health check on an existing project: dependency audit, security scan, test runner detection, CI/CD evaluation, and missing configuration analysis. Maps the three execution gates (pre/in/post) from /10x-bootstrapper to an assessment framework for existing codebases. Reads optional context/foundation/stack-assessment.md from /10x-stack-assess to focus checks on identified gaps. Writes context/foundation/health-check.md with findings, prioritized fixes, and an agent-readiness verdict. Use when the user has an existing project and wants to verify its health before working with an agent. Trigger phrases: "health check", "check my project", "audit my project", "is my project healthy", "sprawdź projekt", "audyt projektu", "health-check", "project health". Use AFTER /10x-stack-assess (brownfield chain), BEFORE agent onboarding (m1-l4).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You MUST use this when building projects end-to-end. Orchestrates all 12 team roles — automatically switches between CTO, architect, PM, engineers, SRE, security, DBA, QA, and EM based on the current phase of work. Starts with brainstorming before any implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to add or configure Maven plugins in your pom.xml — including quality tools (enforcer, surefire, failsafe, jacoco, pitest, spotbugs, pmd), security scanning (OWASP), code formatting (Spotless), version management, container image build (Jib), build information tracking, and benchmarking (JMH) — through a consultative, modular step-by-step approach that only adds what you actually need. This should trigger for requests such as Add Maven plugins in pom.xml; Improve Maven plugins in pom.xml. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。