007
無料Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Affiliate and sponsored content generator — create natural product review, comparison, and recommendation articles that comply with ステマ規制. Integrates compliance-checker for automatic legal safety. Supports review, comparison, and experience-based formats.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Create product content that converts AND complies — natural recommendations, not hard sells.
/affiliate {product} or /affiliate~/.content-autopilot/profile.json must exist/affiliate {product} — Generate affiliate content for a product/affiliate compare {product1} vs {product2} — Comparison article/affiliate roundup {category} — "Best X for Y" roundup| Format | Best For | Conversion | Trust |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal review | Single product, used it | High | Highest |
| Comparison | 2-3 products, help decide | Very High | High |
| Roundup | 5-10 products, category guide | Medium | Medium |
| Tutorial with tool | Product as part of how-to | High | Highest |
| Problem → Solution | Product solves a pain point | High | High |
Product details:
1. Product name: {name}
2. Category: {type}
3. Price: ¥{price}
4. Affiliate link: {url}
5. Relationship: {purchased / gifted / sponsored / affiliate only}
6. Have you used it? (yes / no)
7. Key features: {list}
8. Target user: {who benefits most}
Personal Review Format:
PR(※本記事にはアフィリエイトリンクが含まれます)
# {Product} を{N}ヶ月使ってみた正直レビュー
## なぜ{product}を使い始めたか
{Personal story — what problem you had}
## 良かったポイント
### 1. {benefit_1}
{Specific experience with detail}
### 2. {benefit_2}
{Specific experience}
### 3. {benefit_3}
{Specific experience}
## 正直イマイチだったポイント
### 1. {drawback_1}
{Honest criticism — builds trust}
### 2. {drawback_2}
{Honest criticism}
## こんな人におすすめ / おすすめしない
おすすめ:
- {target user 1}
- {target user 2}
おすすめしない:
- {anti-target 1}
- {anti-target 2}
## まとめ
{Honest verdict — not a hard sell}
{Affiliate link with clear disclosure}
※本記事の内容は個人の使用体験に基づくものです。
効果や使用感には個人差があります。
Comparison Format:
PR
# {Product A} vs {Product B} — {category}で選ぶならどっち?
| 項目 | {Product A} | {Product B} |
|------|-----------|-----------|
| 価格 | ¥{price} | ¥{price} |
| {feature_1} | {rating} | {rating} |
| {feature_2} | {rating} | {rating} |
| {feature_3} | {rating} | {rating} |
## {Product A}の特徴
{Details}
## {Product B}の特徴
{Details}
## 結論: こんな人は{A}、こんな人は{B}
{Nuanced recommendation — not one-sided}
Automatically run compliance-checker:
Running compliance check...
[x] PR表記: 記事冒頭に配置済み
[x] アフィリエイト開示: 明記済み
[x] 誇大表現: なし
[x] 薬機法: 該当なし
[x] 景品表示法: 適合
Status: COMPLIANT — safe to publish
~/Desktop/content-autopilot-output/
affiliate_{product_slug}_{date}.md
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides the creation of agile user stories and Gherkin feature files. Use when the user wants to create a user story, write acceptance criteria, define Gherkin scenarios, or author BDD feature files. This should trigger for requests such as Create a user story; Write a user story; I need to write a user story. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitates conversational discovery to create Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) for non-functional requirements using the ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality model. Use when the user wants to document quality attributes, NFR decisions, security/performance/scalability architecture, or design systems with measurable quality criteria. This should trigger for requests such as Create ADR for Non-functional requirements; Document Non-functional requirements; Capture Non-functional requirements; Generate Non-functional requirements in an ADR. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a health check on an existing project: dependency audit, security scan, test runner detection, CI/CD evaluation, and missing configuration analysis. Maps the three execution gates (pre/in/post) from /10x-bootstrapper to an assessment framework for existing codebases. Reads optional context/foundation/stack-assessment.md from /10x-stack-assess to focus checks on identified gaps. Writes context/foundation/health-check.md with findings, prioritized fixes, and an agent-readiness verdict. Use when the user has an existing project and wants to verify its health before working with an agent. Trigger phrases: "health check", "check my project", "audit my project", "is my project healthy", "sprawdź projekt", "audyt projektu", "health-check", "project health". Use AFTER /10x-stack-assess (brownfield chain), BEFORE agent onboarding (m1-l4).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You MUST use this when building projects end-to-end. Orchestrates all 12 team roles — automatically switches between CTO, architect, PM, engineers, SRE, security, DBA, QA, and EM based on the current phase of work. Starts with brainstorming before any implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to add or configure Maven plugins in your pom.xml — including quality tools (enforcer, surefire, failsafe, jacoco, pitest, spotbugs, pmd), security scanning (OWASP), code formatting (Spotless), version management, container image build (Jib), build information tracking, and benchmarking (JMH) — through a consultative, modular step-by-step approach that only adds what you actually need. This should trigger for requests such as Add Maven plugins in pom.xml; Improve Maven plugins in pom.xml. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。