007
無料Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when setting up a secure email inbox for any AI agent — configuring inbound email via Resend, webhooks, tunneling for local development, and implementing security measures to prevent prompt injection attacks. Also use when someone mentions 'agent email', 'bot inbox', 'receive emails for agent', 'agent webhook', 'email security for AI', 'prompt injection via email', 'inbound email for bot', or wants their AI agent to receive and respond to emails securely.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Set up a secure email inbox that lets an AI agent receive and respond to emails, with protection against prompt injection and email-based attacks.
Core principle: An AI agent's inbox is a potential attack vector. Malicious actors can email instructions that the agent might blindly follow. Security configuration is not optional — it's the first thing you implement, not the last.
This skill is context-independent — it does not use brand/ files and works identically in any project.
Output: A configured webhook handler file, environment variable checklist, and security configuration.
Sender → Email → Resend (MX) → Webhook → Your Server → AI Agent
↓
Security Validation
↓
Process or Reject
Ask the user:
Don't paste API keys in chat! They'll persist in conversation history. Have the user write directly to
.envor use a secrets manager.
Use your auto-generated address: <anything>@<your-id>.resend.app. No DNS configuration needed.
The user enables receiving in the Resend dashboard, then adds an MX record:
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Type | MX |
| Host | Your domain or subdomain (e.g., agent.yourdomain.com) |
| Value | Provided in Resend dashboard |
| Priority | 10 (lowest number takes precedence) |
Use a subdomain (e.g., agent.yourdomain.com) to avoid disrupting existing email services on your root domain — otherwise all email routes to Resend.
The user registers a webhook in Resend dashboard (Webhooks → Add Webhook → select email.received). They need the endpoint URL you'll create and the signing secret for verification.
// app/api/webhooks/email/route.ts (Next.js App Router)
import { Resend } from 'resend';
import { NextRequest, NextResponse } from 'next/server';
const resend = new Resend(process.env.RESEND_API_KEY);
export async function POST(req: NextRequest) {
try {
const payload = await req.text();
const event = resend.webhooks.verify({
payload,
headers: {
'svix-id': req.headers.get('svix-id'),
'svix-timestamp': req.headers.get('svix-timestamp'),
'svix-signature': req.headers.get('svix-signature'),
},
secret: process.env.RESEND_WEBHOOK_SECRET,
});
if (event.type === 'email.received') {
const { data: email } = await resend.emails.receiving.get(
event.data.email_id
);
// Security validation happens here (see Security Levels)
await processEmailForAgent(event.data, email);
}
return new NextResponse('OK', { status: 200 });
} catch (error) {
console.error('Webhook error:', error);
return new NextResponse('Error', { status: 400 });
}
}
Resend retries failed deliveries with exponential backoff over ~6 hours. Emails are stored even if webhooks fail.
Your local server isn't accessible from the internet. Use tunneling to expose it:
| Option | Persistent URL? | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| ngrok (paid) | Yes (static subdomain) | $8/mo |
| Cloudflare named tunnel | Yes (your own domain) | Free |
| ngrok (free) | No (changes on restart) | Free |
| VS Code Port Forwarding | No (changes per session) | Free |
For webhooks, persistent URLs matter — otherwise you re-register the URL every time the tunnel restarts. See the tunneling docs for each tool for setup instructions.
# ngrok (paid - recommended for persistent dev)
ngrok http --domain=myagent.ngrok.io 3000
# Cloudflare named tunnel (free but more setup)
cloudflared tunnel run my-agent-webhook
For a reliable agent inbox, deploy to production rather than relying on tunnels:
This is the most critical part of the setup. An AI agent that processes emails without security is dangerous.
There are 5 graduated security levels. Read references/security-levels.md for complete code examples and implementation details. Present the options to the user and help them choose:
| Level | Approach | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Strict Allowlist | Only process emails from approved addresses | Personal assistant agents |
| 2. Domain Allowlist | Allow any address at approved domains | Team/org internal agents |
| 3. Content Filtering | Accept from anyone, filter injection patterns | Customer support agents |
| 4. Sandboxed Processing | Accept all, restrict agent capabilities | Public-facing agents |
| 5. Human-in-the-Loop | Require human approval for untrusted senders | High-stakes agents |
Levels can be combined (e.g., Domain Allowlist + Content Filtering).
| Practice | Why |
|---|---|
| Verify webhook signatures | Spoofed events let attackers control your agent |
| Log all rejected emails | Audit trail reveals attack patterns |
| Use allowlists where possible | Explicit trust is safer than trying to filter bad input |
| Rate limit email processing | A flood of emails can overwhelm your agent or exhaust API quotas |
| Separate trusted/untrusted handling | Different risk levels need different agent capabilities |
| Anti-Pattern | Risk |
|---|---|
| Processing emails without validation | Anyone can control your agent by sending an email |
| Trusting email headers for authentication | "From:" headers are trivially spoofed — use webhook verification instead |
| Executing code from email content | Remote code execution — the most dangerous vulnerability |
| Storing email content in prompts verbatim | Prompt injection attacks bypass your security layer entirely |
| Giving untrusted emails full agent access | One malicious email could compromise your entire system |
Connect your webhook to your AI agent:
async function processWithAgent(email: ProcessedEmail) {
const message = `New Email\nFrom: ${email.from}\nSubject: ${email.subject}\n\n${email.body}`.trim();
await sendToAgent(message);
}
Alternatively, the agent can poll the Resend API during heartbeats instead of using webhooks — simpler architecture but less immediate.
See references/security-levels.md for the complete secure agent inbox implementation with configurable security levels, rate limiting, content truncation, and rejection logging.
RESEND_API_KEY=re_xxxxxxxxx
RESEND_WEBHOOK_SECRET=whsec_xxxxxxxxx
SECURITY_LEVEL=strict # strict | domain | filtered | sandboxed
ALLOWED_SENDERS=you@example.com,trusted@example.com
ALLOWED_DOMAINS=yourcompany.com
OWNER_EMAIL=you@example.com # For security notifications
| Mistake | Why It's a Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| No sender verification | Anyone can control your agent | Implement a security level (start with Level 1) |
| Trusting email headers | Headers are trivially spoofed | Rely on webhook signature verification only |
| Same treatment for all emails | Trusted and untrusted senders have different risk profiles | Use capability-based access control |
| Using ephemeral tunnel URLs | URL changes on restart, breaking webhook delivery | Use paid ngrok or Cloudflare named tunnels |
| No rate limiting | Flooding attacks can overwhelm the agent | Implement per-sender rate limits |
| Processing HTML directly | HTML can contain hidden injection content | Strip to plain text before processing |
delivered@resend.dev — simulates successful deliverybounced@resend.dev — simulates hard bouncesend-email — sending emails from your agentresend-inbound — detailed inbound email processing (domain setup, content retrieval, attachments)まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides the creation of agile user stories and Gherkin feature files. Use when the user wants to create a user story, write acceptance criteria, define Gherkin scenarios, or author BDD feature files. This should trigger for requests such as Create a user story; Write a user story; I need to write a user story. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitates conversational discovery to create Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) for non-functional requirements using the ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality model. Use when the user wants to document quality attributes, NFR decisions, security/performance/scalability architecture, or design systems with measurable quality criteria. This should trigger for requests such as Create ADR for Non-functional requirements; Document Non-functional requirements; Capture Non-functional requirements; Generate Non-functional requirements in an ADR. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a health check on an existing project: dependency audit, security scan, test runner detection, CI/CD evaluation, and missing configuration analysis. Maps the three execution gates (pre/in/post) from /10x-bootstrapper to an assessment framework for existing codebases. Reads optional context/foundation/stack-assessment.md from /10x-stack-assess to focus checks on identified gaps. Writes context/foundation/health-check.md with findings, prioritized fixes, and an agent-readiness verdict. Use when the user has an existing project and wants to verify its health before working with an agent. Trigger phrases: "health check", "check my project", "audit my project", "is my project healthy", "sprawdź projekt", "audyt projektu", "health-check", "project health". Use AFTER /10x-stack-assess (brownfield chain), BEFORE agent onboarding (m1-l4).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You MUST use this when building projects end-to-end. Orchestrates all 12 team roles — automatically switches between CTO, architect, PM, engineers, SRE, security, DBA, QA, and EM based on the current phase of work. Starts with brainstorming before any implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to add or configure Maven plugins in your pom.xml — including quality tools (enforcer, surefire, failsafe, jacoco, pitest, spotbugs, pmd), security scanning (OWASP), code formatting (Spotless), version management, container image build (Jib), build information tracking, and benchmarking (JMH) — through a consultative, modular step-by-step approach that only adds what you actually need. This should trigger for requests such as Add Maven plugins in pom.xml; Improve Maven plugins in pom.xml. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。