本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

agent-script-dsl

Authoring and managing Agentforce agent definitions using the declarative Agent Script DSL (.agent files) and associated metadata types. Use when creating agents in source control, debugging agent metadata, or understanding the metadata lifecycle of GenAiPlugin/GenAiPlanner/BotVersion types. Triggers: 'how do I deploy an Agentforce agent using source control', 'what metadata types make up an Agentforce agent', 'agent test run command failing in CI pipeline', 'GenAiPlugin vs GenAiPlanner metadata relationship'. NOT for Apex-based agent actions (use custom-agent-actions-apex). NOT for UI-based agent creation (use agentforce-agent-creation).

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md19.1 KB
  • source.json1.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Agent Script DSL

Use this skill when the work involves authoring, editing, validating, or deploying Agentforce agent definitions through source-controlled metadata rather than through the Agentforce Builder UI. This skill covers the YAML-based .agent file format, the three composite metadata types that make up an agent (GenAiPlugin, GenAiPlanner/GenAiPlannerBundle, BotVersion), LSP validation tooling, the sf agent test run CLI command, and the metadata deployment lifecycle end-to-end. It does not cover Apex implementation of invocable agent actions (use agentforce/custom-agent-actions-apex) and does not cover UI-driven agent creation workflow (use agentforce/agentforce-agent-creation).

Agentforce agent definitions are stored as YAML-based declarative metadata in .agent files within a Salesforce DX project. These files are the machine-readable representations of the same configuration surfaced in Agentforce Builder. Understanding the relationship between the three composite metadata types — GenAiPlugin, GenAiPlanner (or GenAiPlannerBundle from API v64+), and BotVersion — is essential for correct deployment and source control management.


Before Starting

Gather this context before working on anything in this domain:

  • What is the target Salesforce CLI and API version? GenAiPlannerBundle was introduced at API v64 (Spring '26). Projects targeting API v60–v63 use GenAiPlanner instead. Mixing versions in the same project causes deploy failures.
  • Is the Salesforce Extensions for VS Code installed along with the Agentforce extension? LSP-based DSL validation requires both. Without them, YAML errors in .agent files produce silent or cryptic deploy failures.
  • Is the project structured as a Salesforce DX project with sfdx-project.json? The sf agent CLI commands operate on DX-structured projects only.
  • What is the current state of the agent in the org? Retrieving before editing is critical — manually authored .agent files that diverge from the deployed BotVersion state produce merge conflicts on the next retrieve.
  • Are there existing GenAiPlugin or GenAiFunction metadata files in the project? These must be co-deployed with BotVersion and GenAiPlannerBundle as a unit.

Core Concepts

The Three Composite Metadata Types

An Agentforce agent in source control is not a single file. It is composed of three linked metadata types that must be deployed together as a bundle:

GenAiPlugin — the action definition layer. Each GenAiPlugin corresponds to a topic in Agentforce Builder. It declares the topic label, description (used by the LLM for topic classification), and references to the GenAiFunction records (actions) that belong to the topic. A plugin that has a vague or overlapping description will cause the LLM planner to route incorrectly, even if the metadata deploys cleanly.

GenAiPlanner / GenAiPlannerBundle — the orchestration configuration layer. GenAiPlanner (API v60–v63) or GenAiPlannerBundle (API v64+) configures the LLM reasoning engine: model selection, planner instructions (the system prompt), and the set of GenAiPlugins the agent can invoke. The bundle variant introduces the ability to link the planner to a BotVersion within a single metadata record, replacing the manual cross-reference approach of the earlier type.

BotVersion — the conversation container and channel routing shell. BotVersion wraps the Bot record and manages conversation session parameters, language settings, and fallback behavior. It also carries the reference that links a deployed agent to the GenAiPlannerBundle. BotVersion without a linked planner produces a legacy Einstein Bot, not an Agentforce agent. The presence of the genAiPlannerBundle element in BotVersion XML is the authoritative indicator that a BotVersion is an Agentforce agent and not a legacy scripted bot.

All three types must be retrieved and deployed as a coherent unit. Partial deploys — for example, deploying only GenAiPlugin changes without an updated BotVersion — will either fail validation or produce a deployed state that diverges from the source of truth in version control.

YAML-Based .agent File Format

The .agent file is the primary human-authoring surface for Agentforce agent definitions in a DX project. It is a YAML file that declaratively defines the full agent configuration: agent metadata, planner instructions (the system prompt persona), topic references, and action references. The Salesforce CLI tooling (sf agent) consumes .agent files and translates them into the correct GenAiPlugin/GenAiPlanner/BotVersion metadata records during deployment.

Key YAML keys in a typical .agent file:

  • name — the agent API name (immutable after first deployment)
  • type — agent for standard Agentforce agents
  • spec.agentType — differentiates service agents from custom agents
  • spec.description — the agent's role description (becomes part of the system context)
  • spec.topics — array of topic definitions, each with a label, description, and list of actions
  • spec.plannerInstructions — the full system prompt block governing persona, tone, and constraints

The Salesforce Agentforce VS Code extension provides LSP validation against the .agent schema. Hover hints, inline error diagnostics, and autocomplete are available when the extension is active. Authoring .agent files without LSP validation significantly increases the risk of silent schema violations that only surface at deploy time.

LLM-Driven Orchestration vs. Legacy Einstein Bot FSM

Legacy Einstein Bots used a finite state machine (FSM): dialog flows defined explicit transitions between states, and conversation routing was deterministic. Agentforce agents use LLM-driven orchestration: the GenAiPlanner uses a language model to decide at runtime which topic to invoke and which action to execute within that topic, based on the user's utterance and the planner instructions.

This distinction has direct implications for metadata authoring. In an FSM bot, gaps in dialog states produce predictable fallthrough behavior. In an Agentforce agent, poorly written topic descriptions or action descriptions cause the LLM to route incorrectly — routing issues manifest as wrong-topic invocation or no-topic fallback, not as errors in the metadata itself. Debugging a misbehaving agent therefore requires reviewing the natural-language content of topic and action descriptions, not just the structural validity of the metadata.

sf agent test run — CLI-Based Agent Testing

The sf agent test run command (Beta as of Spring '26) executes automated agent tests defined as .aiTest metadata records against a deployed agent in a target org. Tests specify input utterances and expected outcomes (expected topic classification, expected action invocation, or expected response text patterns). This command is the primary mechanism for verifying agent behavior in CI pipelines without a live UI session.

sf agent test run \
  --spec force-app/main/default/aiTests/myAgentTest.aiTest-meta.xml \
  --target-org MySandbox \
  --wait 10

Key behaviors:

  • Requires the agent to be Active in the target org. Running sf agent test run against an Inactive or Draft agent returns an error.
  • Tests run asynchronously in the org. The --wait flag sets a polling timeout in minutes (default 5).
  • Exit code 1 indicates test failure or timeout; exit code 0 indicates all assertions passed.
  • As a Beta feature, the command signature and assertion schema may change between Salesforce releases. Pin the @salesforce/plugin-agent CLI plugin version in CI pipeline tooling.

Common Patterns

Pattern 1: Source-Control-First Agent Development

When to use: Creating a new Agentforce agent or making topology changes (new topics, restructured actions) and managing them through version control with a CI/CD pipeline.

How it works:

  1. Initialize the agent definition with the Salesforce CLI:
    sf agent generate agent --name MyServiceAgent --target-org DevSandbox
    
    This scaffolds a .agent file and the corresponding GenAiPlugin/BotVersion stubs in the DX project.
  2. Edit the .agent file in VS Code with the Agentforce extension active. The LSP provides inline validation.
  3. Iterate on spec.plannerInstructions, topic descriptions, and action references locally.
  4. Deploy the full metadata bundle:
    sf project deploy start \
      --metadata Bot:MyServiceAgent \
      --metadata BotVersion:MyServiceAgent.v1 \
      --metadata GenAiPlannerBundle:MyServiceAgent \
      --metadata GenAiPlugin:MyServiceAgent_TopicOne \
      --target-org DevSandbox
    
  5. Activate the agent in the target org (activation is not scriptable via Metadata API; it is a UI action).
  6. Run agent tests:
    sf agent test run --spec force-app/.../myTest.aiTest-meta.xml --target-org DevSandbox
    

Why not UI-only authoring: UI-only authoring produces configuration that lives only in the org. It cannot be reviewed in pull requests, rolled back deterministically, or promoted through a pipeline without manual re-entry. YAML-based authoring provides auditability, reviewability, and repeatable deployment.

Pattern 2: Retrieve-Before-Edit to Prevent State Divergence

When to use: Any time an agent has been modified in the Agentforce Builder UI and those changes need to be reconciled with the source-control version.

How it works:

  1. Retrieve the current deployed state before editing:
    sf project retrieve start \
      --metadata Bot:MyServiceAgent \
      --metadata BotVersion:MyServiceAgent.v1 \
      --metadata GenAiPlannerBundle:MyServiceAgent \
      --metadata "GenAiPlugin:MyServiceAgent_*" \
      --target-org DevSandbox
    
  2. Diff the retrieved files against the local working copy using Git.
  3. Resolve conflicts before committing. Pay special attention to plannerInstructions blocks — these are plain-text fields and are overwritten entirely by each retrieve.
  4. Commit the reconciled state, then redeploy from the branch.

Why not skip the retrieve: Deploying stale .agent files over a more recent org state can silently regress changes made in the Builder UI. In production, this can take an active agent and replace its instructions with an older version.

Pattern 3: Debugging Routing Failures with DSL Content Inspection

When to use: An agent routes to the wrong topic or falls back to "I can't help with that" even when the topic clearly applies.

How it works:

  1. Open the .agent file and review spec.topics[*].description for each topic. The description is the primary signal used by the LLM planner for classification.
  2. Check for overlapping descriptions across topics — the planner may be ambiguous about which topic to invoke.
  3. Review spec.plannerInstructions for any negative constraints that might be inadvertently excluding valid queries.
  4. Redeploy updated descriptions, retest with sf agent test run.
  5. If the problem persists, retrieve the latest GenAiPlugin XML for the affected topic and verify the description stored in the org matches the .agent file.

Decision Guidance

SituationRecommended ApproachReason
New agent with no source control historyGenerate with sf agent generate agent, build in VS Code with LSPEstablishes source-of-truth in version control from the start
Agent exists only in org, needs to move to source controlRetrieve all metadata layers, commit, then manage via pipelineRetrieve-first prevents state divergence from the first deploy
API v60–v63 project (older sandbox)Use GenAiPlanner, not GenAiPlannerBundleGenAiPlannerBundle requires API v64+ (Spring '26)
CI pipeline needs automated agent testingUse sf agent test run with .aiTest metadataOnly scriptable agent test mechanism; exit codes integrate with CI
Topic routing is inconsistentEdit topic descriptions in .agent file, not action definitionsThe LLM planner uses topic descriptions for routing; actions are invoked after routing
Agent changes made in Builder UIRetrieve before next deployPrevents overwriting org state with stale source

Recommended Workflow

Step-by-step instructions for an AI agent or practitioner working on this task:

  1. Confirm environment — verify the Salesforce CLI version, @salesforce/plugin-agent plugin version, and target org API version. Confirm whether the project targets GenAiPlanner (v60–v63) or GenAiPlannerBundle (v64+).
  2. Retrieve current state — before making any changes, retrieve the Bot, BotVersion, GenAiPlannerBundle/GenAiPlanner, and all GenAiPlugin records from the target org. Diff against the local working copy and resolve conflicts.
  3. Author or edit the .agent file — use VS Code with the Salesforce Agentforce extension. Address any LSP diagnostic warnings before proceeding. Pay particular attention to topic description quality and the plannerInstructions block.
  4. Deploy the full metadata bundle — deploy Bot, BotVersion, GenAiPlannerBundle, and all GenAiPlugin records together. Never deploy a subset of the bundle.
  5. Activate the agent — navigate to Setup > Agentforce Agents (or Agentforce Builder) and explicitly activate the agent in the target org. Activation is not automated via Metadata API.
  6. Run agent tests — execute sf agent test run against the target org. Review output for routing failures, action invocation failures, or assertion mismatches. Iterate on topic or planner instruction content as needed.
  7. Commit and promote — commit the full metadata bundle (.agent file plus all generated XML) and promote through the pipeline. Repeat activation in each target org after deployment.

Review Checklist

Run through these before marking work in this area complete:

  • API version confirmed; GenAiPlanner vs GenAiPlannerBundle selected correctly.
  • All metadata layers retrieved from the target org before editing.
  • .agent file has no LSP diagnostic errors or warnings in VS Code with Agentforce extension.
  • Topic descriptions are distinct and non-overlapping to avoid LLM routing ambiguity.
  • plannerInstructions block contains specific, deterministic persona and constraint language.
  • Agent API name is finalized — it cannot be changed after first deployment.
  • Full metadata bundle (Bot + BotVersion + GenAiPlannerBundle + all GenAiPlugin) deployed together.
  • Agent activated in the target org after deployment.
  • sf agent test run passes with exit code 0.
  • All metadata files committed to version control before promoting to the next environment.
  • Activation repeated manually in each target environment after pipeline promotion.

Salesforce-Specific Gotchas

Non-obvious platform behaviors that cause real production problems:

  1. GenAiPlannerBundle requires API v64+ — projects with apiVersion set to v63 or lower in sfdx-project.json cannot use GenAiPlannerBundle. Attempting to deploy it produces a confusing "Unknown type" error. Set apiVersion: 64.0 or higher before building Spring '26 agents.
  2. Activation is not deployable — the Active/Inactive/Draft state of an agent is not part of any deployable metadata record. Every org promotion requires a manual activation step in Setup. Pipelines that skip post-deploy activation steps will leave agents in Inactive state silently.
  3. Partial bundle deploys cause state divergence — deploying GenAiPlugin records without the BotVersion, or vice versa, can leave the org in a state where the deployed agent references metadata that does not match the deployed plugin set. Always deploy the full bundle atomically.
  4. Topic description content drives routing, not metadata structure — structural validity (correct YAML schema, correct XML element nesting) does not guarantee correct agent behavior. LLM routing is based on the natural-language quality of topic descriptions. A valid deploy of a well-structured .agent file with vague topic descriptions produces a broken agent with no metadata errors.
  5. sf agent test run requires an Active agent — running agent tests against a Draft or Inactive agent returns an error that is easy to misread as a CLI or credential problem. Always confirm the agent is Active in the target org before running CI test jobs.

Output Artifacts

ArtifactDescription
.agent YAML fileDeclarative agent definition for VS Code authoring and version control
GenAiPlugin XML recordsMetadata files for each topic, containing topic description and action references
GenAiPlannerBundle XMLMetadata linking the planner instructions and plugins to the BotVersion
BotVersion XMLAgent container with channel settings and GenAiPlannerBundle reference
sf agent test run commandsCLI invocations for CI pipeline agent testing with exit-code integration
Metadata deploy command setFull sf project deploy start commands targeting the complete agent bundle

Related Skills

  • agentforce/agentforce-agent-creation — use for UI-driven agent setup, channel assignment, activation, and lifecycle management in Setup.
  • agentforce/custom-agent-actions-apex — use when the problem is implementing invocable Apex methods that serve as agent actions, not the metadata layer.
  • agentforce/agent-channel-deployment — use when the problem is configuring Embedded Service, Messaging for Web, or Agent API channel surfaces.
  • devops/scratch-org-management — use when agent development involves scratch orgs, unlocked packages, or org shape-based environment management.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

007

無料

Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aibot88/sec_skill_store42026年5月27日 更新

Guides the creation of agile user stories and Gherkin feature files. Use when the user wants to create a user story, write acceptance criteria, define Gherkin scenarios, or author BDD feature files. This should trigger for requests such as Create a user story; Write a user story; I need to write a user story. Part of cursor-rules-java project

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aibot88/sec_skill_store42026年5月27日 更新

Facilitates conversational discovery to create Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) for non-functional requirements using the ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality model. Use when the user wants to document quality attributes, NFR decisions, security/performance/scalability architecture, or design systems with measurable quality criteria. This should trigger for requests such as Create ADR for Non-functional requirements; Document Non-functional requirements; Capture Non-functional requirements; Generate Non-functional requirements in an ADR. Part of cursor-rules-java project

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aibot88/sec_skill_store42026年5月27日 更新

Run a health check on an existing project: dependency audit, security scan, test runner detection, CI/CD evaluation, and missing configuration analysis. Maps the three execution gates (pre/in/post) from /10x-bootstrapper to an assessment framework for existing codebases. Reads optional context/foundation/stack-assessment.md from /10x-stack-assess to focus checks on identified gaps. Writes context/foundation/health-check.md with findings, prioritized fixes, and an agent-readiness verdict. Use when the user has an existing project and wants to verify its health before working with an agent. Trigger phrases: "health check", "check my project", "audit my project", "is my project healthy", "sprawdź projekt", "audyt projektu", "health-check", "project health". Use AFTER /10x-stack-assess (brownfield chain), BEFORE agent onboarding (m1-l4).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aibot88/sec_skill_store42026年5月27日 更新

10x-team

無料

You MUST use this when building projects end-to-end. Orchestrates all 12 team roles — automatically switches between CTO, architect, PM, engineers, SRE, security, DBA, QA, and EM based on the current phase of work. Starts with brainstorming before any implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aibot88/sec_skill_store42026年5月27日 更新

Use when you need to add or configure Maven plugins in your pom.xml — including quality tools (enforcer, surefire, failsafe, jacoco, pitest, spotbugs, pmd), security scanning (OWASP), code formatting (Spotless), version management, container image build (Jib), build information tracking, and benchmarking (JMH) — through a consultative, modular step-by-step approach that only adds what you actually need. This should trigger for requests such as Add Maven plugins in pom.xml; Improve Maven plugins in pom.xml. Part of cursor-rules-java project

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aibot88/sec_skill_store42026年5月27日 更新

aibot88 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する