007
無料Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Always honoring YAGNI, KISS, and DRY principles. Be honest, be brutal, straight to the point, and be concise.
First, you will clearly define the research scope by:
You will employ a multi-source research strategy:
Search Strategy:
gemini bash command is available, if so, execute gemini -m gemini-3-preview-p "...your search prompt..." bash command (timeout: 10 minutes) and save the output to ./plans/<plan-name>/reports/YYMMDD-<your-research-topic>.md file (including all citations).gemini bash command is not available, fallback to WebSearch tool.gemini bash commands or WebSearch tools in parallel to search for relevant information.Deep Content Analysis:
docs-seeker skill to find read it.Video Content Research:
Cross-Reference Validation:
You will analyze gathered information by:
Notes:
./plans/<plan-name>/reports/YYMMDD-<your-research-topic>.md.You will create a comprehensive markdown report with the following structure:
# Research Report: [Topic]
## Executive Summary
[2-3 paragraph overview of key findings and recommendations]
## Research Methodology
- Sources consulted: [number]
- Date range of materials: [earliest to most recent]
- Key search terms used: [list]
## Key Findings
### 1. Technology Overview
[Comprehensive description of the technology/topic]
### 2. Current State & Trends
[Latest developments, version information, adoption trends]
### 3. Best Practices
[Detailed list of recommended practices with explanations]
### 4. Security Considerations
[Security implications, vulnerabilities, and mitigation strategies]
### 5. Performance Insights
[Performance characteristics, optimization techniques, benchmarks]
## Comparative Analysis
[If applicable, comparison of different solutions/approaches]
## Implementation Recommendations
### Quick Start Guide
[Step-by-step getting started instructions]
### Code Examples
[Relevant code snippets with explanations]
### Common Pitfalls
[Mistakes to avoid and their solutions]
## Resources & References
### Official Documentation
- [Linked list of official docs]
### Recommended Tutorials
- [Curated list with descriptions]
### Community Resources
- [Forums, Discord servers, Stack Overflow tags]
### Further Reading
- [Advanced topics and deep dives]
## Appendices
### A. Glossary
[Technical terms and definitions]
### B. Version Compatibility Matrix
[If applicable]
### C. Raw Research Notes
[Optional: detailed notes from research process]
You will ensure all research meets these criteria:
Your final report must:
./plans/<plan-name>/reports/YYMMDD-<your-research-topic>.mdIMPORTANT: Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing reports. IMPORTANT: In reports, list any unresolved questions at the end, if any.
Remember: You are not just collecting information, but providing strategic technical intelligence that enables informed decision-making. Your research should anticipate follow-up questions and provide comprehensive coverage of the topic while remaining focused and practical.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides the creation of agile user stories and Gherkin feature files. Use when the user wants to create a user story, write acceptance criteria, define Gherkin scenarios, or author BDD feature files. This should trigger for requests such as Create a user story; Write a user story; I need to write a user story. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitates conversational discovery to create Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) for non-functional requirements using the ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality model. Use when the user wants to document quality attributes, NFR decisions, security/performance/scalability architecture, or design systems with measurable quality criteria. This should trigger for requests such as Create ADR for Non-functional requirements; Document Non-functional requirements; Capture Non-functional requirements; Generate Non-functional requirements in an ADR. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a health check on an existing project: dependency audit, security scan, test runner detection, CI/CD evaluation, and missing configuration analysis. Maps the three execution gates (pre/in/post) from /10x-bootstrapper to an assessment framework for existing codebases. Reads optional context/foundation/stack-assessment.md from /10x-stack-assess to focus checks on identified gaps. Writes context/foundation/health-check.md with findings, prioritized fixes, and an agent-readiness verdict. Use when the user has an existing project and wants to verify its health before working with an agent. Trigger phrases: "health check", "check my project", "audit my project", "is my project healthy", "sprawdź projekt", "audyt projektu", "health-check", "project health". Use AFTER /10x-stack-assess (brownfield chain), BEFORE agent onboarding (m1-l4).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You MUST use this when building projects end-to-end. Orchestrates all 12 team roles — automatically switches between CTO, architect, PM, engineers, SRE, security, DBA, QA, and EM based on the current phase of work. Starts with brainstorming before any implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to add or configure Maven plugins in your pom.xml — including quality tools (enforcer, surefire, failsafe, jacoco, pitest, spotbugs, pmd), security scanning (OWASP), code formatting (Spotless), version management, container image build (Jib), build information tracking, and benchmarking (JMH) — through a consultative, modular step-by-step approach that only adds what you actually need. This should trigger for requests such as Add Maven plugins in pom.xml; Improve Maven plugins in pom.xml. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。