本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

aeo

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(11)

  • SKILL.md10.8 KB
  • .claude-plugin/authoring-notes.json653 B
  • .claude-plugin/plugin.json1.2 KB
  • references/aeo_eeat_canon.md9.5 KB
  • references/aeo_vs_seo.md8.5 KB
  • references/bot_access_and_monitoring.md6.7 KB
  • references/extractable_content_patterns.md10.2 KB
  • references/llm_citation_patterns.md8.4 KB
  • scripts/aeo_audit.py17.0 KB
  • scripts/aeo_optimizer.py10.8 KB
  • scripts/citation_tracker.py12.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO)

Get your content cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Mistral as the authoritative source.

AEO is the practice of optimizing content for citation in LLM-generated responses — distinct from SEO, which optimizes for search rankings. This skill audits, optimizes, and tracks AEO performance.

Distinct From SEO

SEOAEO
Optimizes forClick-through rankingsBeing cited as authoritative source
AudienceHumans browsing search resultsLLMs answering questions
Success metricPosition 1-10, organic trafficCitation count across LLMs
Key signalsBacklinks, keywords, page speedE-E-A-T, structured data, factual density
Update cadenceWeeks-to-monthsDays-to-weeks (LLM training cycles)

Both can coexist — the same content can rank #1 on Google AND get cited by Perplexity. But the techniques differ: SEO rewards keyword density + backlinks; AEO rewards primary-source signals + structured facts.

When To Use

  • Planning a new content piece for an AI-first audience
  • Auditing existing content for E-E-A-T gaps before AI Overview rollout
  • Tracking which pages get cited by which LLM (citation ledger)
  • Researching what queries LLMs cite sources for (vs. what they answer from training)
  • Benchmarking against competitors' citation rates
  • Building a long-term AEO strategy aligned with traditional SEO

When NOT To Use

  • Pure click-through SEO without LLM-citation intent — use marketing-skill/skills/seo-audit instead
  • Brand-voice content with no factual claims — citations require facts to cite
  • Content for a topic where LLMs already have strong training signal (e.g., elementary math) — citation upside is minimal
  • Time-sensitive content (breaking news) — LLM training lag means citations come months later

Core Capabilities

1. Content audit + E-E-A-T scoring

The auditor (aeo_audit.py) scores content across 4 dimensions:

  • Experience: First-person evidence, dated examples, case studies, "We ran X in 2026" claims
  • Expertise: Author bio, credentials, citations to peer-reviewed sources, technical depth
  • Authoritativeness: External backlinks from authority domains, schema.org markup, structured data
  • Trustworthiness: HTTPS, contact info, transparent corrections, factual density (number of verifiable claims per 1000 words)

Composite score 0-100 with per-dimension breakdown. Output: markdown report with specific fix recommendations.

2. Content optimization

The optimizer (aeo_optimizer.py) generates AEO-improved variants:

  • Structure rewrite — H2/H3 hierarchy optimized for LLM parsing
  • Citation density boost — adds [1]-style references with sources
  • Schema injection — generates JSON-LD for FAQ, HowTo, Article schemas
  • Fact-first lede — moves verifiable claims into the first 200 words

Three modes: conservative (touch <10% of words), balanced (touch <30%), aggressive (rewrite for maximum AEO).

3. Citation tracking

The tracker (citation_tracker.py) maintains a local ledger of citations:

  • Manual entry: paste a citation found in ChatGPT/Perplexity/Claude/Gemini output
  • Track which URL, which LLM, which query, what date
  • Compute per-page citation count, citation velocity, LLM coverage
  • Export to CSV for reporting

Stores in ~/.aeo-data/citations.json (local, no telemetry).

References

  • references/aeo_eeat_canon.md — E-E-A-T methodology, industry thresholds, anti-patterns
  • references/llm_citation_patterns.md — per-LLM citation selection heuristics (Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Mistral)
  • references/aeo_vs_seo.md — when to invest in AEO vs SEO vs both
  • references/bot_access_and_monitoring.md — AI crawler robots.txt matrix (the prerequisite check: a blocked bot zeroes that platform), Google Search Console AI Overviews monitoring, manual testing protocols, citation-drop diagnostic (merged from the former ai-seo skill)
  • references/extractable_content_patterns.md — 7 copy-ready block templates (definition, steps, table, FAQ, attributed stat, expert quote, summary box) that answer engines reliably extract (merged from the former ai-seo skill)

Workflow

0. Pre-flight: bot access
   Check robots.txt against the crawler matrix in references/bot_access_and_monitoring.md
   → a blocked GPTBot/PerplexityBot/ClaudeBot/Google-Extended is the first fix, always

1. Audit existing content
   $ python3 scripts/aeo_audit.py --url https://example.com/blog/post
   → markdown report with composite score + 4-dimension breakdown

2. Apply optimization recommendations
   $ python3 scripts/aeo_optimizer.py --input post.md --mode balanced --output post-aeo.md
   → optimized variant with citations + schema + structural fixes

3. Publish + monitor
   $ python3 scripts/citation_tracker.py --action add --url https://example.com/blog/post \
       --llm perplexity --query "what is AEO" --date 2026-05-17
   → adds entry to local citations.json ledger

4. Report
   $ python3 scripts/citation_tracker.py --action report --url https://example.com/blog/post
   → per-page citation stats: count, LLMs, queries, velocity

Configuration

The skill is industry-aware via per-run --industry flag. Supported: saas, healthcare, finance, legal, ecommerce, b2b, media, education.

Industry affects:

  • Authority signal requirements — healthcare/finance need stricter source citations
  • Fact-checking rigor — legal/healthcare flag unverifiable claims as critical
  • Citation style — academic vs. trade-journal vs. blog conventions

Example:

python3 scripts/aeo_audit.py --url <url> --industry healthcare
# → stricter E-E-A-T thresholds; flags any health claim without primary citation

Output Format

Markdown audit report (default)

# AEO Audit Report — [Page Title]

**URL:** https://example.com/blog/post
**Date:** 2026-05-17
**Industry:** saas
**Composite Score:** 72/100 (B+)

## Dimension Breakdown

| Dimension | Score | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Experience | 80/100 | Strong — first-person case study present |
| Expertise | 65/100 | Author bio missing credentials |
| Authoritativeness | 75/100 | 4 backlinks from authority domains |
| Trustworthiness | 68/100 | No corrections policy linked |

## Top 3 Fixes

1. Add author bio with credentials (Expertise +15)
2. Link to corrections policy from footer (Trustworthiness +12)
3. Inject FAQ schema for the 5 questions implicit in H2s (Authoritativeness +8)

## All Recommendations
[...]

## Audit Trail
[3-count of analysis steps, sources cited, time taken]

JSON for pipelines

python3 scripts/aeo_audit.py --url <url> --output json

Returns full structured data for integration with content management workflows.

Industry-Specific E-E-A-T Thresholds

IndustryMin CompositeCritical Signals
Healthcare85Medical reviewer byline, peer-reviewed citations, FDA disclosure
Finance85Author CFA/CPA credentials, "not investment advice" disclaimer, dated examples
Legal85Jurisdiction disclosed, attorney bio, "not legal advice" disclaimer
SaaS70Product manager byline, case study with metrics, ROI calculator
E-commerce65Product reviews aggregated, return policy, schema.org Product
B2B70Industry analyst quotes, customer logos, ROI data
Media70Editorial policy, fact-check link, original reporting
Education75Instructor bio, learning outcomes, accreditation if applicable

Anti-Patterns Rejected

  • Keyword stuffing for AI — LLMs already extract topic from semantics; keyword density doesn't boost citation likelihood
  • Pure AI-generated content with no human review — generic LLM output gets de-prioritized by RAG retrieval algorithms looking for distinctive signal
  • Citation farms / link wheels — modern LLM RAG penalizes low-authority linked networks
  • Schema spam — false or unverifiable schema.org claims get filtered; only mark up real, verifiable claims
  • Optimizing for one LLM at expense of others — citation distributions are highly correlated across major LLMs because they share training data sources; optimize for the shared signals (E-E-A-T) not per-LLM hacks
  • Ignoring SEO entirely — AEO citations often originate from sources that already rank well organically; AEO and SEO are complements, not substitutes

Dependencies

  • stdlib-only for all 3 scripts — no pip install required
  • Optional: requests + beautifulsoup4 if --url mode used (otherwise pass markdown via --input for file-based audits)
  • Optional: any LLM API key for query_research mode (currently scaffold-only — full LLM-driven query research is roadmap)

Storage

All data is local-first:

  • ~/.aeo-data/citations.json — citation ledger
  • ~/.aeo-data/patterns.json — success patterns library
  • ~/.aeo-data/audits/<hash>.md — saved audit reports

No telemetry. No cloud sync. Export to CSV anytime via citation_tracker.py --action export.

Trigger Phrases

  • "AEO audit", "AEO check"
  • "optimize for ChatGPT / Perplexity / Claude / Gemini"
  • "get cited by [LLM]"
  • "LLM citation strategy"
  • "answer engine optimization"
  • "content for AI search"
  • "E-E-A-T audit"
  • "track AI citations"
  • "schema for AI"

Related Skills

  • marketing-skill/skills/seo-audit — traditional click-through SEO
  • marketing-skill/skills/programmatic-seo — template-driven SEO at scale
  • marketing-skill/skills/content-strategy — broader content planning
  • marketing-skill/skills/copywriting — voice + tone
  • marketing-skill/skills/schema-markup — structured data implementation

Version: 2.7.3 Source: Ported from alirezarezvani/aeo-box (answer-engine-optimization/ skill, 2,464 LOC across 9 modules). This port distills the 9-module Python toolkit into 3 stdlib CLI tools per the claude-skills convention; preserves the E-E-A-T scoring methodology, citation-tracking schema, and industry-aware thresholds verbatim. License: MIT (matches upstream + this repo).

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Use when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する