本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

auditing-foundry-smart-contract-security

Pre-deployment security audit of Solidity smart contracts in a Foundry project. Combines static analysis (Slither, Aderyn), symbolic execution (Mythril), and property-based testing (forge fuzz + invariant tests with handlers) to catch reentrancy, access-control, oracle/price manipulation, and arithmetic bugs BEFORE deploying to an EVM chain. Also enforces key hygiene (no plaintext private keys, encrypted cast keystore) and a secure deploy workflow. Use when writing, reviewing, testing, or deploying Solidity/Foundry contracts, building a dApp, or working with forge/cast/anvil, MetaMask, or Web3/DeFi code.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md7.4 KB
  • references/api-reference.md6.4 KB
  • references/secure-deployment-and-keys.md4.1 KB
  • references/vulnerability-checklist.md4.8 KB
  • scripts/agent.py13.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Auditing Foundry Smart Contract Security

Overview

Deployed smart contracts are immutable and custody real funds, so a bug shipped to mainnet cannot be patched — it can only be exploited. Most catastrophic DeFi losses come from a small set of recurring classes: reentrancy, broken access control, oracle/price manipulation, and unchecked arithmetic or external calls.

This skill runs a defense-in-depth, pre-deployment audit of a Foundry project, layering four independent techniques that each catch what the others miss:

  1. Static analysis — slither (90+ detectors) and aderyn (Cyfrin, Rust) scan the AST/IR in seconds for known anti-patterns.
  2. Symbolic execution — mythril (optional, slow) explores execution paths and SMT-solves for deep arithmetic/reentrancy bugs.
  3. Property-based testing — forge test with fuzzing (testFuzz_*) and invariant tests (invariant_* + handler contracts with ghost variables) proves protocol-level properties hold across millions of random sequences.
  4. Manual review + key hygiene — a structured checklist (see references/vulnerability-checklist.md) and a secrets/keystore audit so no private key ever lives in plaintext and deployment goes through an encrypted cast keystore (see references/secure-deployment-and-keys.md).

The skill is dev-side and pre-deployment — it is run by the engineer building the contract, not by a SOC after an incident. Findings gate the deploy: any high/critical static finding, failing test, leaked key, or low coverage = FAIL.

When to Use

  • Before deploying any Solidity contract to a testnet or mainnet EVM chain.
  • When writing or reviewing a Foundry project (foundry.toml, src/, test/, script/).
  • When a contract handles value: tokens (ERC-20/721/1155), vaults, staking, AMMs, bridges, governance.
  • When adding fuzz or invariant tests, or when coverage of value-moving functions is unknown.
  • When wiring deployment scripts — to verify keys are in an encrypted keystore, not .env plaintext.
  • When integrating a price oracle, external call, delegatecall, or upgradeable proxy.
  • When triaging a Slither/Aderyn report and needing to separate real bugs from false positives.

Prerequisites

  • Foundry installed (forge, cast, anvil): curl -L https://foundry.paradigm.xyz | bash && foundryup
  • Slither + solc: pip install slither-analyzer and solc-select install <ver> && solc-select use <ver>
  • Aderyn (recommended): cargo install aderyn (or npm i -g @cyfrin/aderyn)
  • Mythril (optional, slow symbolic exec): pip install mythril
  • gitleaks (key-leak scan): see the companion implementing-secret-scanning-with-gitleaks skill
  • A Foundry project that compiles (forge build succeeds) — analyzers need build artifacts.
  • Solidity ^0.8.x is assumed (built-in overflow checks); pre-0.8 contracts need extra SafeMath review.

Install the Python tools in a virtualenv (recommended on externally-managed distros). Never run analysis against untrusted contract source on a machine with funded wallets unlocked.

Steps

Step 1: Build and sanity-check the project

forge build                    # analyzers require fresh artifacts
forge fmt --check              # style gate (optional)
cat foundry.toml               # note solc version, optimizer, remappings, evm_version

Step 2: Static analysis (fast, run every time)

# Slither — full project (uses foundry.toml + remappings automatically)
slither . --json slither-report.json

# Aderyn — Cyfrin Rust analyzer, complementary detectors
aderyn . -o aderyn-report.json

Or run the bundled orchestrator that runs both, deduplicates, and gates the result:

python3 scripts/agent.py --project . --output audit-report.json

Step 3: Symbolic execution on critical contracts (optional, slow)

# Only on the highest-value contract(s) — Mythril is path-explosive
myth analyze src/Vault.sol --solc-json mythril.config.json --execution-timeout 300 -o json
# or: python3 scripts/agent.py --project . --mythril src/Vault.sol

Step 4: Property-based testing — fuzz + invariants

forge test -vvv                                  # unit + fuzz tests
forge coverage --report summary                  # coverage of value-moving code
forge test --match-test invariant_ -vvv          # invariant suite (handler-based)

Every value-moving contract should have invariant tests with a handler (bounded inputs, ghost variables, targetContract(handler)) — not just unit tests. See references/api-reference.md for the handler pattern, and write a test_RevertWhen_* (with vm.expectRevert) for each access-control guard.

Step 5: Manual review against the checklist

Walk references/vulnerability-checklist.md for every contract: reentrancy (checks-effects-interactions / nonReentrant), access control, oracle manipulation, delegatecall/proxy storage layout, unchecked return values, tx.origin, weak randomness, DoS, front-running/MEV, and ERC-specific pitfalls (approve race, fee-on-transfer, rebasing).

Step 6: Key hygiene & secure deploy

gitleaks detect --no-banner            # no private keys / mnemonics / .env committed
git ls-files | grep -E '\.env$|keystore' && echo "WARN: secrets tracked by git"

# Import the deploy key ONCE into an encrypted keystore — never a plaintext PRIVATE_KEY env
cast wallet import deployer --interactive

# Deploy via the keystore account (testnet first), simulate before --broadcast
forge script script/Deploy.s.sol --account deployer --rpc-url <testnet> --broadcast --verify

See references/secure-deployment-and-keys.md for the full hardening rules (MetaMask hygiene, hardware wallet for mainnet, RPC trust, post-deploy verification).

Step 7: Triage and report

Combine Slither + Aderyn + Mythril + test results, deduplicate by (file, line), drop confirmed false positives, rank by exploitability × financial impact, and map each to its SWC id. The orchestrator emits audit-report.json with a PASS/FAIL gate.

Expected Output

A JSON audit report listing findings with SWC identifiers, severity, tool source, affected contract/function/line, and remediation; plus the test/coverage summary and a single PASS / FAIL deploy gate. FAIL on any high/critical static finding, failing test, leaked secret, or coverage below the configured threshold on value-moving code.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Extract DPAPI-protected secrets such as credentials and browser data offline and online.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

Audit, detect, and remediate Shadow Credentials misconfigurations on msDS-KeyCredentialLink in Active Directory. Focuses on access-controls, monitoring Event ID 5136, and credential-management hygiene.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images using dd and dcfldd while preserving evidence integrity through hash verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3 to identify GenericAll, WriteDACL, and WriteOwner abuse paths

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

Perform static analysis of Android APK malware samples using apktool for decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for permission analysis, manifest inspection, and suspicious API call detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

andycungkrinx91 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する