本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

building-attack-pattern-library-from-cti-reports

Extract and catalog attack patterns from cyber threat intelligence reports into a structured STIX-based library mapped to MITRE ATT&CK for detection engineering and threat-informed defense.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md13.2 KB
  • references/api-reference.md1.4 KB
  • scripts/agent.py5.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Building Attack Pattern Library from CTI Reports

Overview

Cyber threat intelligence (CTI) reports from vendors like Mandiant, CrowdStrike, Talos, and Microsoft contain detailed descriptions of adversary behaviors that can be extracted, normalized, and cataloged into a structured attack pattern library. This skill covers parsing CTI reports to extract adversary techniques, mapping behaviors to MITRE ATT&CK technique IDs, creating STIX 2.1 Attack Pattern objects, building a searchable library indexed by tactic, technique, and threat actor, and generating detection rule templates from documented patterns.

When to Use

  • When deploying or configuring building attack pattern library from cti reports capabilities in your environment
  • When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
  • When building or improving security architecture for this domain
  • When conducting security assessments that require this implementation

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.9+ with stix2, mitreattack-python, spacy, requests libraries
  • Collection of CTI reports (PDF, HTML, or text format)
  • MITRE ATT&CK STIX data (local or via TAXII)
  • Understanding of ATT&CK technique structure and naming conventions
  • Familiarity with detection engineering concepts (Sigma, YARA)

Key Concepts

Attack Pattern Extraction

CTI reports describe adversary behaviors in natural language. Extraction involves identifying action verbs and technical terms that map to ATT&CK techniques, recognizing tool names and malware families, identifying infrastructure indicators, and mapping sequences of behaviors to attack chains (kill chain phases).

STIX 2.1 Attack Pattern Objects

STIX defines Attack Pattern as a Structured Domain Object (SDO) that describes ways threat actors attempt to compromise targets. Each pattern links to ATT&CK via external references, includes kill chain phases (tactics), and can be related to Intrusion Sets, Malware, and Tool objects.

Detection Rule Generation

Extracted attack patterns inform detection engineering by providing: specific procedure examples for Sigma rule creation, behavioral sequences for correlation rules, IOC patterns for YARA and Snort rules, and data source requirements for telemetry gaps.

Workflow

Step 1: Parse CTI Reports and Extract Behaviors

import re
import json
from collections import defaultdict

class CTIReportParser:
    """Parse CTI reports to extract adversary behaviors."""

    BEHAVIOR_INDICATORS = [
        "used", "executed", "deployed", "leveraged", "exploited",
        "established", "created", "modified", "downloaded", "uploaded",
        "exfiltrated", "injected", "enumerated", "spawned", "dropped",
        "persisted", "escalated", "moved laterally", "collected",
        "encrypted", "compressed", "encoded", "obfuscated",
    ]

    TOOL_PATTERNS = [
        r'\b(Cobalt Strike|Mimikatz|PsExec|BloodHound|Rubeus|Impacket)\b',
        r'\b(PowerShell|cmd\.exe|WMI|WMIC|certutil|bitsadmin)\b',
        r'\b(Metasploit|Empire|Covenant|Sliver|Brute Ratel)\b',
        r'\b(Lazagne|SharpHound|ADFind|Sharphound|Invoke-Obfuscation)\b',
    ]

    TECHNIQUE_KEYWORDS = {
        "spearphishing": "T1566",
        "phishing attachment": "T1566.001",
        "phishing link": "T1566.002",
        "powershell": "T1059.001",
        "command line": "T1059.003",
        "scheduled task": "T1053.005",
        "registry run key": "T1547.001",
        "process injection": "T1055",
        "dll side-loading": "T1574.002",
        "credential dumping": "T1003",
        "lsass": "T1003.001",
        "kerberoasting": "T1558.003",
        "pass the hash": "T1550.002",
        "remote desktop": "T1021.001",
        "smb": "T1021.002",
        "winrm": "T1021.006",
        "data staging": "T1074",
        "exfiltration over c2": "T1041",
        "dns tunneling": "T1071.004",
        "web shell": "T1505.003",
    }

    def parse_report(self, text, report_metadata=None):
        """Parse a CTI report and extract behaviors."""
        sentences = re.split(r'[.!?]\s+', text)
        behaviors = []

        for sentence in sentences:
            sentence_lower = sentence.lower()
            # Check for behavior indicators
            for indicator in self.BEHAVIOR_INDICATORS:
                if indicator in sentence_lower:
                    behavior = {
                        "sentence": sentence.strip(),
                        "action": indicator,
                        "tools": self._extract_tools(sentence),
                        "technique_hints": self._match_techniques(sentence_lower),
                    }
                    if behavior["technique_hints"]:
                        behaviors.append(behavior)
                    break

        print(f"[+] Extracted {len(behaviors)} behavioral indicators from report")
        return behaviors

    def _extract_tools(self, text):
        """Extract tool/malware names from text."""
        tools = set()
        for pattern in self.TOOL_PATTERNS:
            matches = re.findall(pattern, text, re.IGNORECASE)
            tools.update(matches)
        return list(tools)

    def _match_techniques(self, text):
        """Match text to ATT&CK technique hints."""
        matches = []
        for keyword, tech_id in self.TECHNIQUE_KEYWORDS.items():
            if keyword in text:
                matches.append({"keyword": keyword, "technique_id": tech_id})
        return matches

parser = CTIReportParser()
sample_report = """
The threat actor used spearphishing attachments with macro-enabled documents to
gain initial access. Once inside, they executed PowerShell scripts to download
additional tooling. The actor leveraged Mimikatz to dump credentials from LSASS
memory. They then used pass the hash techniques for lateral movement via SMB
to multiple systems. Data was staged in a compressed archive and exfiltrated
over the existing C2 channel. The actor established persistence through
scheduled tasks and registry run keys.
"""
behaviors = parser.parse_report(sample_report)

Step 2: Map Behaviors to ATT&CK Techniques

from attackcti import attack_client

class ATTACKMapper:
    def __init__(self):
        self.lift = attack_client()
        self.techniques = {}
        self._load_techniques()

    def _load_techniques(self):
        """Load all ATT&CK techniques for mapping."""
        all_techs = self.lift.get_enterprise_techniques()
        for tech in all_techs:
            tech_id = ""
            for ref in tech.get("external_references", []):
                if ref.get("source_name") == "mitre-attack":
                    tech_id = ref.get("external_id", "")
                    break
            if tech_id:
                self.techniques[tech_id] = {
                    "name": tech.get("name", ""),
                    "description": tech.get("description", "")[:500],
                    "tactics": [p.get("phase_name") for p in tech.get("kill_chain_phases", [])],
                    "platforms": tech.get("x_mitre_platforms", []),
                    "data_sources": tech.get("x_mitre_data_sources", []),
                }
        print(f"[+] Loaded {len(self.techniques)} ATT&CK techniques")

    def map_behaviors(self, behaviors):
        """Map extracted behaviors to ATT&CK techniques."""
        mapped = []
        for behavior in behaviors:
            for hint in behavior.get("technique_hints", []):
                tech_id = hint["technique_id"]
                if tech_id in self.techniques:
                    tech_info = self.techniques[tech_id]
                    mapped.append({
                        "technique_id": tech_id,
                        "technique_name": tech_info["name"],
                        "tactics": tech_info["tactics"],
                        "source_sentence": behavior["sentence"],
                        "tools_observed": behavior["tools"],
                        "keyword_matched": hint["keyword"],
                        "data_sources": tech_info["data_sources"],
                    })
        print(f"[+] Mapped {len(mapped)} behaviors to ATT&CK techniques")
        return mapped

mapper = ATTACKMapper()
mapped_behaviors = mapper.map_behaviors(behaviors)

Step 3: Create STIX 2.1 Attack Pattern Library

from stix2 import AttackPattern, Relationship, Bundle, TLP_GREEN
from datetime import datetime

class AttackPatternLibrary:
    def __init__(self):
        self.patterns = []
        self.relationships = []

    def add_pattern_from_mapping(self, mapping, report_source="CTI Report"):
        """Create STIX Attack Pattern from mapped behavior."""
        pattern = AttackPattern(
            name=mapping["technique_name"],
            description=f"Observed: {mapping['source_sentence']}\n\n"
                        f"Tools: {', '.join(mapping['tools_observed']) or 'None identified'}\n"
                        f"Source: {report_source}",
            external_references=[{
                "source_name": "mitre-attack",
                "external_id": mapping["technique_id"],
                "url": f"https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/{mapping['technique_id'].replace('.', '/')}/",
            }],
            kill_chain_phases=[{
                "kill_chain_name": "mitre-attack",
                "phase_name": tactic,
            } for tactic in mapping["tactics"]],
            object_marking_refs=[TLP_GREEN],
        )
        self.patterns.append(pattern)
        return pattern

    def build_library(self, mapped_behaviors, report_source="CTI Report"):
        """Build complete attack pattern library from mappings."""
        seen_techniques = set()
        for mapping in mapped_behaviors:
            tech_id = mapping["technique_id"]
            if tech_id not in seen_techniques:
                self.add_pattern_from_mapping(mapping, report_source)
                seen_techniques.add(tech_id)

        bundle = Bundle(objects=self.patterns + self.relationships)
        print(f"[+] Library: {len(self.patterns)} attack patterns")
        return bundle

    def export_library(self, output_file="attack_pattern_library.json"):
        bundle = Bundle(objects=self.patterns + self.relationships)
        with open(output_file, "w") as f:
            f.write(bundle.serialize(pretty=True))
        print(f"[+] Library exported to {output_file}")

    def generate_detection_templates(self, mapped_behaviors):
        """Generate Sigma rule templates from attack patterns."""
        templates = []
        for mapping in mapped_behaviors:
            template = {
                "title": f"Detection: {mapping['technique_name']} ({mapping['technique_id']})",
                "status": "experimental",
                "description": f"Detects {mapping['technique_name']} based on CTI report observation",
                "references": [
                    f"https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/{mapping['technique_id'].replace('.', '/')}/",
                ],
                "tags": [
                    f"attack.{mapping['tactics'][0]}" if mapping['tactics'] else "attack.unknown",
                    f"attack.{mapping['technique_id'].lower()}",
                ],
                "data_sources": mapping.get("data_sources", []),
                "observed_tools": mapping.get("tools_observed", []),
                "source_context": mapping["source_sentence"],
            }
            templates.append(template)

        with open("detection_templates.json", "w") as f:
            json.dump(templates, f, indent=2)
        print(f"[+] Generated {len(templates)} detection templates")
        return templates

library = AttackPatternLibrary()
bundle = library.build_library(mapped_behaviors, "Sample CTI Report")
library.export_library()
templates = library.generate_detection_templates(mapped_behaviors)

Validation Criteria

  • CTI report parsed and behavioral indicators extracted
  • Behaviors mapped to ATT&CK techniques with confidence
  • STIX 2.1 Attack Pattern objects created with proper references
  • Library searchable by tactic, technique, and threat actor
  • Detection templates generated from documented patterns
  • Library exportable as STIX bundle for sharing

References

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Extract DPAPI-protected secrets such as credentials and browser data offline and online.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

Audit, detect, and remediate Shadow Credentials misconfigurations on msDS-KeyCredentialLink in Active Directory. Focuses on access-controls, monitoring Event ID 5136, and credential-management hygiene.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images using dd and dcfldd while preserving evidence integrity through hash verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3 to identify GenericAll, WriteDACL, and WriteOwner abuse paths

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

Perform static analysis of Android APK malware samples using apktool for decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for permission analysis, manifest inspection, and suspicious API call detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

andycungkrinx91 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する