本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

audit-xls

Audit a spreadsheet for formula accuracy, errors, and common mistakes. Scopes to a selected range, a single sheet, or the entire model (including financial-model integrity checks like BS balance, cash tie-out, and logic sanity). Triggers on "audit this sheet", "check my formulas", "find formula errors", "QA this spreadsheet", "sanity check this", "debug model", "model check", "model won't balance", "something's off in my model", "model review".

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Audit Spreadsheet

Audit formulas and data for accuracy and mistakes. Scope determines depth — from quick formula checks on a selection up to full financial-model integrity audits.

Step 1: Determine scope

If the user already gave a scope, use it. Otherwise ask them:

What scope do you want me to audit?

  • selection — just the currently selected range
  • sheet — the current active sheet only
  • model — the whole workbook, including financial-model integrity checks (BS balance, cash tie-out, roll-forwards, logic sanity)

The model scope is the deepest — use it for DCF, LBO, 3-statement, merger, comps, or any integrated financial model before sending to a client or IC.


Step 2: Formula-level checks (ALL scopes)

Run these regardless of scope:

CheckWhat to look for
Formula errors#REF!, #VALUE!, #N/A, #DIV/0!, #NAME?
Hardcodes inside formulas=A1*1.05 — the 1.05 should be a cell reference
Inconsistent formulasA formula that breaks the pattern of its neighbors in a row/column
Off-by-one rangesSUM/AVERAGE that misses the first or last row
Pasted-over formulasCell that looks like a formula but is actually a hardcoded value
Circular referencesIntentional or accidental
Broken cross-sheet linksReferences to cells that moved or were deleted
Unit/scale mismatchesThousands mixed with millions, % stored as whole numbers
Hidden rows/tabsCould contain overrides or stale calculations

Step 3: Model-integrity checks (MODEL scope only)

If scope is model, identify the model type (DCF / LBO / 3-statement / merger / comps / custom) and run the appropriate integrity checks below.

3a. Structural review

CheckWhat to look for
Input/formula separationAre inputs clearly separated from calculations?
Color conventionBlue=input, black=formula, green=link — or whatever the model uses, applied consistently?
Tab flowLogical order (Assumptions → IS → BS → CF → Valuation)?
Date headersConsistent across all tabs?
UnitsConsistent (thousands vs millions vs actuals)?

3b. Balance Sheet

CheckTest
BS balancesTotal Assets = Total Liabilities + Equity (every period)
RE rollforwardPrior RE + Net Income − Dividends = Current RE
Goodwill/intangiblesFlow from acquisition assumptions (if M&A)

If BS doesn't balance, quantify the gap per period and trace where it breaks — nothing else matters until this is fixed.

3c. Cash Flow Statement

CheckTest
Cash tie-outCF Ending Cash = BS Cash (every period)
CF sumsCFO + CFI + CFF = Δ Cash
D&A matchD&A on CF = D&A on IS
CapEx matchCapEx on CF matches PP&E rollforward on BS
WC changesSigns match BS movements (ΔAR, ΔAP, ΔInventory)

3d. Income Statement

CheckTest
Revenue buildTies to segment/product detail
TaxTax expense = Pre-tax income × tax rate (allow for deferred tax adj)
Share countTies to dilution schedule (options, converts, buybacks)

3e. Circular references

  • Interest → debt balance → cash → interest is a common intentional circ in LBO/3-stmt models
  • If intentional: verify iteration toggle exists and works
  • If unintentional: trace the loop and flag how to break it

3f. Logic & reasonableness

CheckFlag if
Growth rates>100% revenue growth without explanation
MarginsOutside industry norms
Terminal value dominanceTV > ~75% of DCF EV (yellow flag)
Hockey-stickProjections ramp unrealistically in out-years
CompoundingEBITDA compounds to absurd $ by Year 10
Edge casesModel breaks at 0% or negative growth, negative EBITDA, leverage goes negative

3g. Model-type-specific bugs

DCF:

  • Discount rate applied to wrong period (mid-year vs end-of-year)
  • Terminal value not discounted back
  • WACC uses book values instead of market values
  • FCF includes interest expense (should be unlevered)
  • Tax shield double-counted

LBO:

  • Debt paydown doesn't match cash sweep mechanics
  • PIK interest not accruing to principal
  • Management rollover not reflected in returns
  • Exit multiple applied to wrong EBITDA (LTM vs NTM)
  • Fees/expenses not deducted from Day 1 equity

Merger:

  • Accretion/dilution uses wrong share count (pre- vs post-deal)
  • Synergies not phased in
  • Purchase price allocation doesn't balance
  • Foregone interest on cash not included
  • Transaction fees not in sources & uses

3-statement:

  • Working capital changes have wrong sign
  • Depreciation doesn't match PP&E schedule
  • Debt maturity schedule doesn't match principal payments
  • Dividends exceed net income without explanation

Step 4: Report

Output a findings table:

#SheetCell/RangeSeverityCategoryIssueSuggested Fix

Severity:

  • Critical — wrong output (BS doesn't balance, formula broken, cash doesn't tie)
  • Warning — risky (hardcodes, inconsistent formulas, edge-case failures)
  • Info — style/best-practice (color coding, layout, naming)

For model scope, prepend a summary line:

Model type: [DCF/LBO/3-stmt/...] — Overall: [Clean / Minor Issues / Major Issues] — [N] critical, [N] warnings, [N] info

Don't change anything without asking — report first, fix on request.


Notes

  • BS balance first — if it doesn't balance, everything downstream is suspect
  • Hardcoded overrides are the #1 source of silent bugs — search aggressively
  • Sign convention errors (positive vs negative for cash outflows) are extremely common
  • If the model uses VBA macros, note any macro-driven calculations that can't be audited from formulas alone

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Complete, populate and fill out 3-statement financial model templates (Income Statement, Balance Sheet, Cash Flow Statement) . Use when asked to fill out model templates, complete existing model frameworks, populate financial models with data, complete a partially filled IS/BS/CF framework, or link integrated financial statements within an existing template structure. Triggers include requests to fill in, complete, or populate a 3-statement model template

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/financial-services4万2026年9月22日 更新

Build the period-end accrual schedule — for each accrual, compute the entry, cite the support, and draft the JE. Use during month-end close; the JE is a draft for controller approval, not a posting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/financial-services4万2026年9月22日 更新

Scan the portfolio for the highest-leverage AI opportunities and rank where to deploy operating-partner time. Ingests quarterly updates and financials across multiple portfolio companies, identifies quick wins at each, and stacks them into a single ranked action list. Use during quarterly portfolio reviews, annual planning, or when deciding which companies get AI investment first. Triggers on "AI readiness", "AI opportunity scan", "where should we deploy AI", "AI across the portfolio", "AI quick wins", or "which portcos are ready for AI".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/financial-services4万2026年9月22日 更新

Analyze the bond futures basis by pricing futures, identifying the cheapest-to-deliver, and comparing with yield curves to assess delivery option value and basis trading opportunities. Use when analyzing bond futures, computing the basis, identifying CTD bonds, calculating implied repo rates, or evaluating basis trades.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/financial-services4万2026年9月22日 更新

Perform relative value analysis on bonds by combining pricing, yield curve context, credit spreads, and scenario stress testing. Use when analyzing bond richness/cheapness, computing spread decomposition, comparing bonds, assessing bond value vs curves, or running rate shock scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/financial-services4万2026年9月22日 更新

Root-cause a reconciliation break to its source transaction or posting — follow the audit trail from the break row back to the originating entry on each side and state what differs and why. Use after gl-recon has classified a break.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/financial-services4万2026年9月22日 更新

anthropics のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する