本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

account-research

Research a company using Common Room data. Triggers on 'research [company]', 'tell me about [domain]', 'pull up signals for [account]', 'what's going on with [company]', or any account-level question.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB
  • references/signals-guide.md2.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Account Research

Retrieve and synthesize account information from Common Room. Handles four interaction patterns: full overviews, targeted field questions, sparse data situations, and combined MCP data + LLM reasoning.

Step 0: Load User Context (Me)

Before researching any account, fetch the Me object from Common Room. This provides:

  • The user's profile, title, role, and Persona in CR
  • The user's segments ("My Segments")

Default all queries to the user's own segments unless the user explicitly asks for a broader view. This keeps results scoped to their territory.

Step 1: Identify the Interaction Pattern

Determine what the user actually needs before deciding how much data to fetch:

Pattern 1 — Full Overview: "Tell me about Datadog" / "Summarize cloudflare.com" → Fetch the full field set and produce a structured briefing.

Pattern 2 — Targeted Question: "Who owns the Snowflake account?" / "Is acme.io showing buying signals?" / "What's the employee count for notion.so?" → Fetch only the relevant field(s). Return a direct, concise answer — do not produce a full brief for a simple question.

Pattern 3 — Sparse Data: "Tell me about tiny-startup.io" → If Common Room has limited data for an account, say so honestly: "There is limited information available for this account." Never speculate or fill gaps with generic statements.

Pattern 4 — Combined Reasoning: Fetch structured MCP data, then layer in LLM analysis — e.g., "Stripe has 8,000 employees and is hiring heavily for AI roles. Based on your ICP of 1k–10k fintech companies, this is a strong fit."

Step 2: Look Up the Account

Search Common Room for the account by domain or company name. Exact match first; if no result, try partial match and confirm with the user before proceeding.

Step 3: Fetch the Right Fields

Use the Common Room object catalog to see available field groups and their contents. For full overviews, request all field groups. For targeted questions, request only what's relevant.

Key field groups to know about:

  • Scores — always return as raw values or percentiles, never labels
  • Summary research — RoomieAI output; often the richest qualitative signal
  • Top contacts — sorted by score desc; use communityMemberID for full lookups

Choosing what to fetch:

User query typeFields to request
Full account overviewAll field groups
"Who owns this account?"Company profiles & links, CRM fields
"Is this company a good fit?"Key fields, scores, about
"What signals is this account showing?"Scores, summary research, CRM fields
"Who are the top contacts?"Top contacts
"What does RoomieAI say about them?"Summary research, all research
"Find engineers at this account"Prospects (with title filter)

Step 4: Web Search (Sparse Data Only)

Common Room is the primary data source. Do not run web search when CR returns rich data.

When CR data is sparse (Pattern 3 — few fields returned, no activity, no scores), run a targeted web search to fill gaps:

  • "[company name]" news — scoped to the last 30 days
  • Look for: funding rounds, acquisitions, product launches, executive changes, press coverage

If the user explicitly asks for external context or recent news, run web search regardless of data richness.

Step 5: Apply Reasoning (Pattern 4)

When the user's question invites synthesis — not just data retrieval — layer in analysis:

  • Compare account data to known ICP criteria from session context
  • Identify fit signals (size, industry, tech stack, hiring patterns)
  • Note timing signals (funding, trial status, recent activity spike)
  • Frame insights as clearly derived from data, not assumed

When the user's company context is available (see references/my-company-context.md), position findings relative to the user's value proposition and ICP.

Step 6: Produce Output

Only include sections where Common Room returned actual data. Omit sections entirely rather than filling them with guesses.

Full overview (when data is rich):

## [Company Name] — Account Overview

**Snapshot**
[2–3 sentences: what they do, plan/stage, relationship status]

**Key Details**
[Employee count, industry, location, domain, funding — from key fields]

**CRM & Ownership** [If CRM fields returned]
[Owner, opp stage, ARR]

**Scores** [If scores returned]
[All available scores as raw values or percentiles]

**Signal Highlights** [If activity/signals exist]
[3–5 most important signals with dates]

**Top Contacts** [If contacts returned]
[Name | Title | Score — top 5 sorted by score desc]

**RoomieAI Research** [If summary research is non-null]
[Summary research output; list all available research topic names]

**Recommended Next Steps**
[2–3 specific, signal-backed actions]

Targeted question: 1–3 sentence direct answer. No full brief needed.

Sparse data (few fields returned, most sections would be empty):

## [Company Name] — Account Overview (Limited Data)

**Data available:** [List exactly what Common Room returned]

[Present only the returned fields]

**Web Search**
[Findings from web search — or "No significant recent news found"]

**Note:** Common Room has limited data on this account. The account may need enrichment in Common Room.

Quality Standards

  • Scores must always be raw values or percentiles — never categorical labels
  • For targeted questions, answer precisely and don't over-deliver
  • Be explicit when data is missing or stale — don't speculate
  • Keep full briefings readable in 2–3 minutes
  • Every fact must trace to a tool call — don't include data not returned by Common Room

Reference Files

  • references/signals-guide.md — signal type taxonomy and interpretation guide

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Run a WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility audit on a design or page. Trigger with "audit accessibility", "check a11y", "is this accessible?", or when reviewing a design for color contrast, keyboard navigation, touch target size, or screen reader behavior before handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins2.9万2026年10月11日 更新

360-degree view of an account - CRM data, recent email threads, docs, transcripts, and internal chat chatter, synthesized into one brief. Use when the user asks "tell me about [account]" (an existing customer; for a prospect, account-research), "account context for [name]", "what's going on with [account]", or "catch me up on [account]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins2.9万2026年10月11日 更新

Build or refresh a strategic account plan - current state, goals, stakeholder coverage, opportunity map, risks, and the action plan - written to a doc and key fields synced to the CRM. Use when the user says "build an account plan for [account]", "update the [account] plan", "account planning for [account]", or before a planning cycle / QBR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins2.9万2026年10月11日 更新

Research a target company and optionally a specific contact - company overview, recent news, likely priorities, and fit against your ICP. Cross-references existing CRM records. Use when the user asks to "research [company]", "look into [company]", "prospect research on [company]", "look up [person]", "intel on [prospect]", "who is [person] at [company]", or "tell me about [company]" when the company is a prospect rather than an existing account.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins2.9万2026年10月11日 更新

Score and tier a list of accounts (or your full book) against ICP fit and engagement signals to prioritize where to spend time. Use when the user asks to "tier my accounts", "prioritize my book", "which accounts should I focus on", or "score these accounts".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins2.9万2026年10月11日 更新

The ads consultant that becomes an ads agent. Reads paid-ad performance natively through the TikTok Ads connector, or via a build-connector Zapier connection for other ad platforms, explains in plain English what is working and what is burning money, recommends budget, targeting, and creative changes with the dollar impact of each, drafts new ad copy in the owner's voice plus Canva creative briefs, and — only after an explicit yes — executes the approved changes in the ad account. Works from exported CSV reports when nothing is connected, the normal starting point. Use this whenever the owner talks about ads or ad spend at all, including "are my ads working," "what's my ROI on ads," "I'm spending money on Facebook and I don't know what I'm getting," "should I turn this campaign off," "my cost per lead is going up," "write me a new ad," "who should I be targeting," or "the ad guy quit."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins2.9万2026年10月11日 更新

anthropics のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する