本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

upgrade-fab-provider

Upgrade the pinned Flask-AppBuilder (FAB) dependency in the Apache Airflow FAB provider (`providers/fab/`). Bumps the exact `flask-appbuilder==` pin and its mirror constant, regenerates `uv.lock`, drives the `test_fab_alignment.py` drift tripwire, reviews the vendored security-manager `override.py` against the new upstream FAB, and conditionally re-vendors static assets / DB migrations. Use when asked to "upgrade FAB", "bump flask-appbuilder", or move the FAB provider to a newer Flask-AppBuilder release.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md12.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->

upgrade-fab-provider

Airflow's FAB provider is tightly coupled to a specific Flask-AppBuilder release because it vendors-in and subclasses large parts of FAB's security manager. A version bump is therefore never "just change the pin" — it must be reconciled against the vendored code, and that reconciliation is enforced by a pytest alignment test, not a prek hook.

The canonical reference for a real bump is PR #66841 ("Bump flask-appbuilder to 5.2.1 and mirror new auth event hooks") — commit c72b6613fd. Read its diff first when in doubt: git show c72b6613fd.

The coupling — why this is not a one-line change

  • providers/fab/pyproject.toml:75-80 explains it: Airflow vendored FAB's security-manager code into providers/fab/src/airflow/providers/fab/auth_manager/security_manager/override.py (~2700 lines) as FabAirflowSecurityManagerOverride. Every bump must review that class against upstream FAB for new / changed / removed methods.
  • test_fab_alignment.py mechanically detects drift between the installed FAB package and the vendored override, and fails CI until the developer reconciles it.

Inputs

  • Target version — the FAB version to move to. If not given, use the latest release on PyPI (https://pypi.org/pypi/flask-appbuilder/json → info.version). Confirm the target with the user if it is a major or minor bump (higher reconciliation risk); a patch bump can proceed.

The files a bump touches

Always:

  1. providers/fab/pyproject.toml — line ~80, the flask-appbuilder==X.Y.Z pin (the only real dependency pin in the repo).
  2. providers/fab/tests/unit/fab/auth_manager/security_manager/test_fab_alignment.py — EXPECTED_FAB_VERSION = "X.Y.Z" (line ~43). Must move in lockstep with the pin.
  3. providers/fab/docs/index.rst — the dependency table row ``flask-appbuilder`` ``==X.Y.Z`` (line ~114).
  4. providers/fab/README.rst — the Requirements table row (line ~60). Do not hand-edit — it is auto-generated. Regenerate it from the bumped pyproject.toml with the sync-provider-readme prek hook (Step 8); the hook re-renders the table whenever pyproject.toml changes. (Pre-existing bumps that predate this hook left it to release-time regeneration; today the hook is per-commit, so CI flags the drift — run it.)
  5. uv.lock — regenerated (see Step 4 for the pinned-uv caveat).

Conditionally:

  1. providers/fab/src/airflow/providers/fab/auth_manager/security_manager/override.py — transplant any relevant upstream FAB changes (new auth hooks, changed signatures, ported fixes). The reference bump added +37 lines here. Note: a green alignment test does not prove the transplant is unnecessary — a security fix may live inside a method Airflow vendors (see the 5.2.2 worked example below).
  2. providers/fab/src/airflow/providers/fab/www/** + providers/fab/www-hash.txt — only if the new FAB ships changed static assets / templates that are re-vendored (see Step 6).
  3. providers/fab/src/airflow/providers/fab/migrations/versions/** — only if the new FAB version ships DB migrations (see Step 7).

Never: no newsfragment, and do not hand-edit providers/fab/docs/changelog.rst — providers are released from main and the release manager regenerates the changelog from git log (per providers/AGENTS.md). The commit subject is the changelog entry.

Procedure

Step 1 — Determine the target version and current state

  • Read the current pin: grep flask-appbuilder== providers/fab/pyproject.toml.
  • Resolve the target (PyPI latest, or the user's requested version).
  • Classify the jump: patch / minor / major. For minor/major, skim the FAB release notes (https://github.com/dpgaspar/Flask-AppBuilder/releases) for security-manager / model / template changes before editing.

Step 2 — Bump the three source pins

Edit in lockstep:

  • providers/fab/pyproject.toml — the flask-appbuilder==X.Y.Z line (keep the trailing # Whenever updating the version, run test_fab_alignment.py to verify. comment).
  • test_fab_alignment.py — EXPECTED_FAB_VERSION = "X.Y.Z". It is the tripwire; editing it now is fine — you will keep re-running the test until it and the other three tests pass.
  • providers/fab/docs/index.rst — the dependency-table ==X.Y.Z row.

Step 3 — Install the new FAB into the provider venv

uv --project providers/fab sync installs the new pin. Confirm the installed version:

uv run --project providers/fab python -c \
  "import importlib.metadata as m; print(m.version('flask-appbuilder'))"

Step 4 — Regenerate uv.lock (pinned uv!)

The lock must be regenerated with the repo's pinned uv version, or it drifts hundreds of unrelated marker lines:

AIRFLOW_UV_VERSION=$(grep -oE 'AIRFLOW_UV_VERSION=[0-9.]+' Dockerfile.ci | head -1 | cut -d= -f2)
uvx --from uv==$AIRFLOW_UV_VERSION uv lock

If a conflict is irrecoverable, delete uv.lock and re-run uv lock with the pinned version. Confirm the diff is limited to the FAB bump, not a wholesale marker rewrite.

Step 5 — Run the alignment test and reconcile override.py

uv run --project providers/fab pytest \
  providers/fab/tests/unit/fab/auth_manager/security_manager/test_fab_alignment.py -xvs

Under the host sandbox the test needs a writable AIRFLOW_HOME and the rerun-failures socket disabled — if it errors on a socket bind or on ~/airflow, run it as:

AIRFLOW_HOME="$TMPDIR/fab_home" uv run --project providers/fab pytest \
  providers/fab/tests/.../test_fab_alignment.py -q -p no:rerunfailures

The four tests and how to fix each:

  1. test_fab_version_matches_expected — trips on the version mismatch. It passes once EXPECTED_FAB_VERSION == installed version, but only after you have done the review below.
  2. test_no_unaudited_fab_methods — a new FAB public method exists that is neither implemented in override.py nor listed in AUDITED_EXCLUSIONS. Fix: either implement/override it in override.py, or add it to AUDITED_EXCLUSIONS with a justification comment.
  3. test_no_stale_exclusions — AUDITED_EXCLUSIONS lists a method the new FAB no longer has. Fix: remove that entry.
  4. test_shared_method_signatures_compatible — FAB changed a method signature (new required param). Fix: update the override.py signature, or add to KNOWN_SIGNATURE_DEVIATIONS if the divergence is intentional.

The manual review that the test cannot fully automate: diff the vendored override.py against the new FAB's flask_appbuilder/security/sqla/manager.py and BaseSecurityManager and transplant behavioural changes (bug fixes, new auth event hooks), not just signatures — the test only checks method presence and required params. Locate the installed source:

uv run --project providers/fab python -c \
  "import flask_appbuilder.security.sqla.manager as m; print(m.__file__)"

Step 6 — Re-vendor static assets / templates (only if changed)

If the new FAB changed frontend assets that Airflow vendors under providers/fab/src/airflow/providers/fab/www/ (templates in templates/appbuilder/, static JS/CSS), re-vendor them, then regenerate the fingerprint:

prek run compile-fab-assets --all-files

This runs scripts/ci/prek/compile_provider_assets.py fab (pnpm build over www/) and rewrites providers/fab/www-hash.txt. A patch bump usually does not touch assets — skip this step unless FAB's templates/static changed. Commit the regenerated www-hash.txt if it changed.

Step 7 — DB migrations (only if FAB ships them)

If the new FAB adds/changes security-model tables, add the corresponding migration under providers/fab/src/airflow/providers/fab/migrations/versions/ and run:

prek run update-migration-references-fab check-revision-heads-map-fab --all-files

Patch bumps normally have no migrations — skip unless the release notes mention schema changes.

Step 8 — Static checks + tests

prek run --from-ref main --stage pre-commit
uv run --project providers/fab pytest providers/fab/tests/unit/fab/auth_manager -xvs

The pre-commit stage runs sync-provider-readme (regenerating README.rst) and other FAB hooks. Re-run the alignment test until all four tests pass. The full provider suite is breeze testing providers-tests --test-type "Providers[fab]".

Step 9 — Self-review and commit

  • git diff main...HEAD — verify only the intended files changed, and uv.lock is a clean FAB-scoped diff.
  • Commit subject in imperative mood, plain prose, no Conventional-Commits prefix, e.g. Bump flask-appbuilder to X.Y.Z in FAB provider. Body explains why (what upstream changes were mirrored), not what.
  • No newsfragment, no changelog edit (provider release manager regenerates from git log).
  • Prepend your PR to the history list in providers/fab/CONTRIBUTING.rst so the FAB-upgrade record stays current.
  • Push to origin and open the PR per the repo's PR conventions.

Gotchas

  • EXPECTED_FAB_VERSION is a second pin. Forgetting it makes test_fab_alignment.py fail even when everything else is correct.
  • uv.lock marker drift. Always use the pinned uv (Step 4) — a bare uv lock rewrites hundreds of environment-marker lines and buries the real diff.
  • The alignment test uses AST, not import, to read FAB's SecurityManager (to avoid SQLAlchemy model-registry collisions with Airflow's vendored models). A green test proves structural alignment; it does not prove behavioural parity — Step 5's manual transplant review is still required.
  • docs/index.rst dependency table may look auto-generated but the reference PR edited it by hand; if a docs-regen prek hook rewrites it, let the hook win.
  • README.rst is generated, but the sync hook is per-commit. Don't hand-edit it; run prek run sync-provider-readme (or the full pre-commit stage) after bumping pyproject.toml — CI fails on the drift otherwise.
  • Don't touch providers/fab/docs/upgrading.rst — that is end-user guidance for upgrading the provider package in a deployment, not the developer bump workflow.

Worked example — 5.2.1 to 5.2.2 (patch)

A patch bump that needed no override.py change, but only after a real behavioural review — the green alignment test alone was not sufficient evidence:

  • FAB 5.2.2 shipped three security-manager fixes: LDAP search-filter escaping, OAuth email-allowlist regex anchoring (email + "$"), and API-login provider validation.
  • All three touch methods Airflow vendors (_search_ldap, auth_user_ldap, auth_user_oauth) — so the alignment test passing did not mean "nothing to do". Each had to be checked by hand:
    • LDAP escaping — Airflow's vendored _search_ldap already escapes via ldap.filter.escape_filter_chars (and adds filter-parenthesis validation); it was ahead of FAB. No transplant.
    • OAuth allowlist anchoring — the match lives in FAB's AuthOAuthView (views.py), and Airflow's CustomAuthOAuthView.oauth_authorized delegates via super().oauth_authorized(), so the fix is inherited from the installed FAB 5.2.2. No transplant.
    • API-login validation / Azure-JWT warning / uuid4 — in FAB core Airflow doesn't vendor. Inherited.
  • Net change set: pyproject.toml, test_fab_alignment.py, docs/index.rst, README.rst (via hook), uv.lock. Commit: Bump flask-appbuilder to 5.2.2 in FAB provider.

The lesson the skill encodes: for every security/behavioural fix in the FAB release notes, locate the method and check whether Airflow vendors it — the alignment test guards structure, you guard behaviour.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Track Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) implementation progress by comparing Confluence specs against codebase evidence. Use when asked to assess, report on, or compare AIP status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

apache/airflow4.7万2026年10月11日 更新

Generate verified recipe playbooks from AIPs with PR implementations (post mode), or speculative user stories from AIPs without implementations (pre mode). Use when the user provides an AIP URL or AIP content, optionally with PR URLs and file paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

apache/airflow4.7万2026年10月11日 更新

Guide for contributing to the Airflow Java SDK (AIP-108). Use this skill whenever a contributor is working in the `java-sdk/` directory or on the Java coordinator in `task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/coordinators/java/` — whether they want to add a feature, write tests, fix a bug, understand the architecture, or prepare a PR. Trigger on phrases like "Java SDK", "JavaCoordinator", "java-sdk", "annotation processor", "Builder.Task", "BundleBuilder", or anything about running JVM tasks in Airflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

apache/airflow4.7万2026年10月11日 更新

Guide for implementing a brand-new language SDK for Airflow (AIP-108). Use this skill when a contributor wants to add support for a new programming language — designing the Python coordinator, implementing the wire protocol in the target language, writing the bundle format, and structuring the PR. Trigger on phrases like "new language SDK", "new SDK", "add support for [language]", "implement coordinator for", "SubprocessCoordinator", "BaseCoordinator", "new runtime", "AFBNDL01", "supervisor schema", or anything about bringing a new language into the Airflow executor ecosystem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

apache/airflow4.7万2026年10月11日 更新

Draft Apache Airflow commit messages, PR titles and descriptions, or GitHub comments and reviews. Also use for release-note decisions when preparing a contribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

apache/airflow4.7万2026年10月11日 更新

Prepare or carry out authorized publication of Apache Airflow changes, including remote checks, pre-push verification, PR creation, and tracking deferred work. Also use when planning these steps or managing contribution issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

apache/airflow4.7万2026年10月11日 更新

apache のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する