本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

commit-message

Generate a conventional commit message by analyzing staged git changes. Use when the user wants to create, write, or generate a git commit message from their current staged diff. Trigger on phrases like "commit", "commit message", "commit msg", "寫 commit", "提交訊息", "generate commit", or when the user has just finished making code changes and wants to commit them. Also trigger when the user runs /commit-message.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Generate Commit Message

Generate a conventional commit message from staged git changes following a structured prompt pipeline.

Steps

1. Stage changes and get the diff

Only stage files that were modified as part of the current session's work. Do not blindly run git add -A or git add . — pick specific files relevant to the task. If unsure which files to stage, show the user git status and let them decide.

Then get both an overview and the full diff:

git diff --staged --stat
git diff --staged

If the diff is empty after this, inform the user that there are no staged changes and stop.

If the diff is very large (e.g., more than 2000 lines), focus on the --stat output and the most important hunks. For files where changes are too extensive, note that those diffs were omitted and base the summary on the stat overview and available context.

If the staged changes span many unrelated modules or more than 10 files across different concerns, suggest splitting into multiple focused commits before proceeding.

2. Check existing commit style

Run a quick scan of recent commits to match the repo's conventions:

git log --oneline -20

If the repo already follows a consistent style (e.g., specific scope naming, prefix preferences, or language), adapt the generated message to match. The conventions in this skill are defaults — defer to the repo's existing patterns when they differ.

3. Analyze the diff

Produce a bullet-point summary of the changes. Follow these rules:

  • A line starting with + means it was added, - means deleted. Lines with neither are context.
  • Write every summary comment as a bullet point starting with -.
  • Do not include file names as part of the comment.
  • Do not use [ or ] characters in the summary.
  • Do not include comments copied from the code.
  • Write only the most important comments. When in doubt, write fewer comments.
  • Readability is top priority.

Example summary comments for reference (do not copy verbatim):

- Increase the number of returned recordings from 10 to 100
- Correct a typo in the GitHub Action name
- Relocate the octokit initialization to a separate file
- Implement an OpenAI API endpoint for completions

4. Generate the commit title

From the summary, write a single-line commit title:

  • Use imperative tense following the kernel git commit style guide.
  • Write a high-level title that captures a single specific theme.
  • Do not repeat the file summaries or list individual changes.
  • Keep the title concise — aim for under 50 characters (the full header including prefix and scope should stay under 72 characters).
  • Lowercase the first character.
  • Remove any trailing period.

5. Determine the prefix and scope

Prefix — choose exactly one label based on the summary:

  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm)
  • chore: Updating libraries, copyrights, or other repo settings, includes updating dependencies
  • ci: Changes to CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: Travis, Circle, GitHub Actions)
  • docs: Non-code changes, such as fixing typos or adding new documentation
  • feat: Introduces a new feature to the codebase
  • fix: Patches a bug in the codebase
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, etc.)
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

Breaking changes — if the diff removes or renames a public API, changes a function signature in a breaking way, or makes any other backward-incompatible change, append ! after the prefix (or after the scope if present). For example: feat!: or feat(api)!:. Additionally, include a BREAKING CHANGE: line in the commit body describing what changed and how to migrate.

Scope — identify the module or package scope from the changed files:

  • Look at the file paths in the diff to determine which module, package, or component is affected.
  • If all changes are within a single module/package/directory, use that as the scope (e.g., model, git, prompt, cmd, provider).
  • Use the most specific common directory or package name. For example, changes only in provider/openai/ should use openai, not provider.
  • If changes span multiple modules, pick the one most central to the change's purpose.
  • Keep the scope short — a single lowercase word.
  • Scope is recommended but optional — if no clear scope can be determined (e.g., changes touch many unrelated areas), omit it and use the format <prefix>: <title> instead.

6. Create the commit

Format the commit message as:

<prefix>(<scope>): <title>

<summary>

Or without scope:

<prefix>: <title>

<summary>

If there is a breaking change, include the footer:

<prefix>(<scope>)!: <title>

<summary>

BREAKING CHANGE: <description of what broke and migration path>

Use a HEREDOC to pass the multi-line message to git commit:

git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
<prefix>(<scope>): <title>

<summary>
EOF
)"

Run git commit directly — do not ask for confirmation.

7. Handle additional user requests

If the user's request includes extra actions beyond committing (e.g., "commit and push", "commit 然後推上去", "commit and create PR"), execute those after the commit succeeds. Common patterns:

  • push: run git push after commit
  • push and PR: push, then create a pull request
  • tag: create a git tag after commit

Only perform actions the user explicitly requested.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Classify a proposed code change as Leaf Node or Core Code to decide how much AI usage and review rigor is appropriate. Use this skill whenever the user asks "is this leaf or core", "what kind of change is this", "should I vibe code this", "can AI write this", "how rigorous should the review be", or before starting any non-trivial change. Also useful as a sub-step inside other workflows (planning, PR prep, code review) when classification matters. Asks 6 diagnostic questions about propagation range, change frequency, tech-debt tolerance, examples, failure cost, and review intensity, then outputs a clear classification with the recommended approach. Trigger even when the user describes a change without explicitly asking for classification — the answer changes how they should proceed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

appleboy/skills232026年9月12日 更新

Runs a single Codex (ChatGPT/OpenAI) review check-fix cycle on a PR using gh CLI. Use this skill whenever the user wants to: check and fix Codex review comments, request a Codex code review on a PR, or iterate on PR feedback from the chatgpt-codex-connector bot. Trigger on phrases like 'codex review', '@codex review', 'fix codex comments', 'iterate on PR', 're-review with codex', or when the user mentions 'gh pr' with 'codex'. Combine with /loop for automated repeated cycles, e.g. '/loop 2m /codex-review'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

appleboy/skills232026年9月12日 更新

Runs a single Copilot review check-fix cycle on a PR using gh CLI. Use this skill whenever the user wants to: check and fix Copilot review comments, request a Copilot code review on a PR, or iterate on PR feedback. Trigger on phrases like 'copilot review', 'fix PR comments', 'iterate on PR', 're-review', or when the user mentions 'gh pr' with 'copilot'. Combine with /loop for automated repeated cycles, e.g. '/loop 2m /copilot-review'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

appleboy/skills232026年9月12日 更新

Plan a feature before writing any code. Use this skill at the START of non-trivial feature work — when the user says they want to "add", "build", "implement", "create", "develop", or "ship" a feature, endpoint, component, page, service, or capability. Especially trigger when the user's prompt is short or under-specified ("add a dashboard", "build an auth flow", "let's do user activity reports") — those need planning, not direct execution. The skill walks through requirements clarification, codebase exploration, sketches a Mermaid architecture/flow diagram of the proposed design, and produces a plan.md document the user can hand off to a fresh AI session for execution. Skip only when the change is genuinely trivial (typo fixes, single-line tweaks, renames). When in doubt, plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

appleboy/skills232026年9月12日 更新

Prepare or open a GitHub or Gitea pull request with an explicit AI-authorship disclosure, change classification, reproducible reviewer verification steps, and optional Mermaid diagram. Use whenever the user asks to prepare, write, open, create, push, ship, or get changes ready for a PR or review. Unless the user explicitly asks for a draft-only result, create or reuse a dedicated branch, verify the change, commit scoped files, push the branch, and then create the PR with gh or tea.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

appleboy/skills232026年9月12日 更新

Audit a prompt the user is about to send to Claude (or another coding AI) for completeness and effectiveness. Use this skill whenever the user shares a prompt and asks for feedback — phrases like "is this prompt good", "audit my prompt", "review this prompt", "will Claude understand this", "improve this prompt", "is this enough context". Also trigger proactively when you notice the user is about to dispatch a vague, under-specified, or over-constrained prompt for non-trivial work. Checks the 6 essential elements (goal, scope, existing patterns, constraints, verification, done definition), flags what's missing, explains why each gap matters, and produces an improved rewrite. Treat this skill as the litmus test for "Be Claude's PM" — if the prompt fails the audit, the work that follows will probably fail too.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

appleboy/skills232026年9月12日 更新

appleboy のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する