本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ca-override

Sanctioned, logged bypass of a gate or hard rule — one audit line, then proceed.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

$ca-override — logged bypass

The sanctioned escape hatch. Bypass is permitted only with an audit log entry. Overrides are always logged, always visible, never silent. Single identity, single confirm.

Flow

  1. Validate $ARGUMENTS — the reason names the gate being bypassed and a justification. Reject a vague reason ("just skip it") and ask for a specific one.

  2. Detect the operator identity from git config user.email only. If it is unset, ask the user once to state their identity for the log. (No platform ladder, no second confirmation.)

  3. For an ordinary override, use the private locked audit helper from the repository root:

    python3 "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/append-override.py" --gate "<gate bypassed>" --reason "<specific reason>"
    

    It appends one line to <project-root>/.codearbiter/overrides.log:

    [ISO-8601 timestamp] | BY: <email> | GATE: <gate bypassed> | REASON: <reason>
    

    The log is append-only — never edited or deleted, committed as a permanent audit artifact. The helper fails closed if another official writer or conflict resolver owns the audit-path lock; the overridden action must not proceed unless the row lands. A guard-permitted raw append remains a cooperative operator escape hatch, but it must not run concurrently with conflict resolution.

  4. A genuine three-stage Git conflict on an H-05 append-only path uses the dedicated helper instead of the ordinary step 3 append. Run it once from the conflicted repository, with the specific repo-relative path and the same reason:

    python3 "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/resolve-append-only-conflict.py" ".codearbiter/overrides.log" --reason "<specific reason>"
    

    The helper derives the same git config user.email identity, validates the merge-base and both append suffixes, writes the attributed H-05 record, and explicitly stages only the validated deterministic union. It refuses a missing or malformed three-stage conflict, any edit to prior bytes, unsupported paths, invalid encoding, dirty audit sink, or replay after resolution. This is scoped to the immediate action only; it creates no marker, standing exception, or general H-05 bypass. It takes canonical per-audit-path locks and supports only overrides.log and the repository-owned gate-events.log sink; official writers share those locks. Conflict resolution is an exclusive cooperative operation: do not start a raw append before or during it. Never hand-resolve the protected log with Write, patch, checkout, or restore.

  5. Proceed with the overridden action. Note in the response that the override is logged.

Security ceiling — heavier path for security-critical stops

A routine gate (lint, a style rule, a non-security review finding) takes the single-confirm path above. But a security-critical stop is NOT bypassable by a single confirm. The following require the heavier path below, never the one-line flow:

  • a security CRITICAL finding;
  • the crypto/secret commit gate (hook H-09b / H-10b — staged crypto/TLS or secret without a gate pass);
  • an irreversible operation (data loss, a destructive migration, anything unrollbackable).

Heavier path (all required, in order):

  1. Surface the specific finding verbatim — name the exact primitive/secret/operation and the concrete risk. A generic "security override" is rejected.

  2. Explicit per-finding acknowledgement — the user must acknowledge that specific finding in their own words (a bare "yes"/"go ahead"/"I trust you" is declined — this mirrors decision-variance). Detect identity from git config user.email; if unset, ask once.

  3. Heavier log entry — use the same locked helper so the mandatory row cannot race conflict resolution:

    python3 "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/append-override.py" --security-finding "<specific finding>" --reason "<reason>"
    

    It appends a line tagged SECURITY-OVERRIDE that records the specific finding, not just the gate name:

    [ISO-8601] | BY: <email> | SECURITY-OVERRIDE | FINDING: <specific finding> | REASON: <reason>
    
  4. Only then record the bypass. For the crypto/secret commit gate, that means resolving the interpreter once by presence — PY=python3; { command -v python3 >/dev/null 2>&1 && python3 --version >/dev/null 2>&1; } || PY=python — never python3 X || python X, which reruns X on any nonzero exit (#577), and running "$PY" "${PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/security-pass.py", which writes <project-root>/.codearbiter/.markers/security-gate-passed bound to the sensitive lines it approves, so hook H-09b/H-10b allows the commit — recorded only after steps 1–3, never to skip the gate proper.

Under $ca-sprint, a security-critical override is a hard-gate STOP: it surfaces to the user and is never auto-decided, even in autonomous mode (SPRINT.md hard gates).

Hard gate

MUST write the log line before proceeding — it is not optional. MUST capture an operator identity — "codeArbiter" or "automated" are not valid. MUST include a justification. The override is scoped to the immediate action only; it creates no standing exception. MUST NOT edit or delete an existing overrides.log entry. For an H-05 three-stage conflict, the dedicated helper's validated union and audit write are the single immediate action; do not pre-edit the conflicted file. MUST route a security-critical / crypto-secret / irreversible stop through the Security ceiling path — never the single-confirm flow — and MUST NOT auto-decide such an override under $ca-sprint.

When NOT to use

  • Routine work that passes all gates — never needed.
  • Reconciling two conflicting sources → $ca-conflict.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

The Socratic spec-refinement front of /feature, and the planning front of /sprint. Routed to BEFORE any code — it turns a one-line idea into a concrete spec with testable criteria, ready for initial combined sprint review or explicit sequential approval. Five gated phases — frame, shape, refine, write, review-and-approve. No implementation before an approved spec; the caller retains required planning, execution and delivery ordering. Each acceptance criterion becomes one tdd Phase 1 obligation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

arbiterForge/codeArbiter1472026年10月11日 更新

Vet a new or changed third-party dependency for license, provenance, and supply-chain risk before any install runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

arbiterForge/codeArbiter1472026年10月11日 更新

ca-adr

無料

Record user-decided ADRs or inspect their health read-only. Preserve attribution and acceptance evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

arbiterForge/codeArbiter1472026年10月11日 更新

Inspect ADR health read-only; optionally select one ADR with --adr N.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

arbiterForge/codeArbiter1472026年10月11日 更新

ca-audit

無料

Assemble the governance record for a range — commits, overrides, ADRs, sprint auto-decisions, open questions, checkpoint findings — into one dated audit packet. Read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

arbiterForge/codeArbiter1472026年10月11日 更新

ca-btw

無料

Lightweight Q&A about the project — answer from context and return, no routing, no state change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

arbiterForge/codeArbiter1472026年10月11日 更新

arbiterForge のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する