本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

active-memory-reminder

Before compaction Loopkit extracts decisions into claude-decisions.json (machine-readable). Read it alongside claude-progress.txt at session start — prose is for humans, JSON is for the loop.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Active Memory Reminder

Loopkit splits shift-notes across two files on purpose:

  • claude-progress.txt — free-form prose. Human-readable narrative of what the last session did, what is in flight, what to pick up next. Wins for context and intent. Loses when the model needs to decide whether a decision was made.
  • claude-decisions.json — machine-readable array of {ts, decision} entries, appended by the loopkit pre-compact hook every time the transcript is about to be compacted. Wins for durability of specific choices ("chose Postgres over SQLite because…", "rejected the polling approach", "tried htmx and switched to Alpine").

Compaction is where reasoning dies. The summarizer keeps the shape of the work but strips the why. claude-decisions.json is the durable side-channel that survives that. This is the same pattern Meta's NapMem paper calls out for behavioral-state-decay in long-running agents: prose degrades faster than structured facts because the model rewrites prose freely and edits structured data carefully (also why loopkit uses JSON for feature_list.json; see [[feature-list-json]]).

When to apply

  • Session start / post-/clear / post-compact. Read claude-decisions.json right after claude-progress.txt and before you look at code. If both files disagree, the JSON is the more recent hard record of a specific choice; the prose gives you the reason.
  • Before re-litigating a design choice. If you're about to propose "let's use X instead of Y," grep claude-decisions.json first. If a prior session already rejected X and wrote it down, don't burn the token budget re-deriving that.
  • When picking up mid-implementation work. Decisions frame constraints the progress file may not restate.

File contract

claude-decisions.json is a JSON array. Every entry is {ts, decision}:

[
  {"ts": "2026-07-14T18:22:09Z", "decision": "chose Playwright MCP over Puppeteer because Puppeteer's alert-modal blind spot bit us in run 41"},
  {"ts": "2026-07-14T20:04:11Z", "decision": "rejected the daemon-per-project approach; switched to a single supervisor with per-project subdirs"},
  {"ts": "2026-07-15T09:31:44Z", "decision": "tried and failed to cache the plan across sessions — plan went stale within two sessions, dropped"}
]

Constraints:

  • Append-only in normal operation. The pre-compact hook appends; sessions read.
  • You MAY add a decision by hand if you make one mid-session that the hook won't catch (e.g., a decision made in code, not prose). Use the same shape. Do not rewrite or delete existing entries — they are the durable record.
  • If entries contradict, newer wins, but note the contradiction in claude-progress.txt so the reason is captured.

The hook

.claude/hooks/pre-compact runs on both manual (/compact) and auto compaction. It skims the transcript for phrases matching decided|chose|rejected|tried and failed|switched from .* to|going with|not going to, dedupes, caps at 20 per compaction, timestamps each, and appends. It is silent-safe: any failure logs to stderr and exits 0 so compaction is never blocked.

Anti-patterns

  • Reading claude-progress.txt and skipping claude-decisions.json. You will re-open settled questions. The prose file often omits why we didn't do the other thing — that's what the JSON is for.
  • Editing or deleting past decisions to "clean them up." Same rule as feature_list.json steps and descriptions: durable structured records are load-bearing. Contradict them in a new entry; don't erase the old one.
  • Storing prose in claude-decisions.json. It is not a second progress file. Entries are single decisions with a timestamp, nothing else.
  • Assuming the hook caught it. The regex catches most decisions but not all. If you made a decision the transcript won't obviously match, add it by hand before ending the session.

Related

  • [[progress-reading-protocol]] — session-opening sequence; step 2b reads this file.
  • [[feature-list-json]] — the other structured-over-prose file loopkit relies on.
  • [[shift-notes]] — the prose companion this file is paired with.
  • [[clean-state-contract]] — session-end discipline that keeps the pairing usable.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a11y-pass

無料

Catch the accessibility failures that ship in almost every AI-built UI. Use after building any interactive component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Review a diff against the goal spec assuming the code is BROKEN. The reviewer that lives in the maker's head always agrees with itself — this pulls review into a hostile, separate pass. Invoke after every code change before marking work done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Verify that an endpoint checks ownership, not just authentication. Use on any handler that reads or mutates user data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Find the exact commit that introduced a bug. Use when something worked before and broke, and you don't know which change did it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Before picking new work, smoke-test the last "completed" feature. If it's broken, revert and re-open it before touching anything else. Kills the "looks shipped, isn't shipped" bug across sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Turn a set of commits or a diff into a clean, user-facing changelog entry. Use before a release or PR description.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Archive228 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する