本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

Strix•功能级授权缺陷

Strix 功能级授权缺陷测试手册,覆盖操作级权限失效、管理功能越权与 API 操作绕过;触发名:strix-broken-function-level-authorization

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Broken Function Level Authorization (BFLA)

BFLA is action-level authorization failure: callers invoke functions (endpoints, mutations, admin tools) they are not entitled to. It appears when enforcement differs across transports, gateways, roles, or when services trust client hints. Bind subject × action at the service that performs the action.

Attack Surface

  • Vertical authz: privileged/admin/staff-only actions reachable by basic users
  • Feature gates: toggles enforced at edge/UI, not at core services
  • Transport drift: REST vs GraphQL vs gRPC vs WebSocket with inconsistent checks
  • Gateway trust: backends trust X-User-Id/X-Role injected by proxies/edges
  • Background workers/jobs performing actions without re-checking authz

High-Value Actions

  • Role/permission changes, impersonation/sudo, invite/accept into orgs
  • Approve/void/refund/credit issuance, price/plan overrides
  • Export/report generation, data deletion, account suspension/reactivation
  • Feature flag toggles, quota/grant adjustments, license/seat changes
  • Security settings: 2FA reset, email/phone verification overrides

Reconnaissance

Surface Enumeration

  • Admin/staff consoles and APIs, support tools, internal-only endpoints exposed via gateway
  • Hidden buttons and disabled UI paths (feature-flagged) mapped to still-live endpoints
  • GraphQL schemas: mutations and admin-only fields/types; gRPC service descriptors (reflection)
  • Mobile clients often reveal extra endpoints/roles in app bundles or network logs

Signals

  • 401/403 on UI but 200 via direct API call; differing status codes across transports
  • Actions succeed via background jobs when direct call is denied
  • Changing only headers (role/org) alters access without token change

Key Vulnerabilities

Verb Drift and Aliases

  • Alternate methods: GET performing state change; POST vs PUT vs PATCH differences; X-HTTP-Method-Override/_method
  • Alternate endpoints performing the same action with weaker checks (legacy vs v2, mobile vs web)

Edge vs Core Mismatch

  • Edge blocks an action but core service RPC accepts it directly; call internal service via exposed API route or SSRF
  • Gateway-injected identity headers override token claims; supply conflicting headers to test precedence

Feature Flag Bypass

  • Client-checked feature gates; call backend endpoints directly
  • Admin-only mutations exposed but hidden in UI; invoke via GraphQL or gRPC tools

Batch Job Paths

  • Create export/import jobs where creation is allowed but finalize/approve lacks authz; finalize others' jobs
  • Replay webhooks/background tasks endpoints that perform privileged actions without verifying caller

Content-Type Paths

  • JSON vs form vs multipart handlers using different middleware: send the action via the most permissive parser

Advanced Techniques

GraphQL

  • Resolver-level checks per mutation/field; do not assume top-level auth covers nested mutations or admin fields
  • Abuse aliases/batching to sneak privileged fields; persisted queries sometimes bypass auth transforms
mutation Promote($id:ID!){
  a: updateUser(id:$id, role: ADMIN){ id role }
}

gRPC

  • Method-level auth via interceptors must enforce audience/roles; probe direct gRPC with tokens of lower role
  • Reflection lists services/methods; call admin methods that the gateway hid

WebSocket

  • Handshake-only auth: ensure per-message authorization on privileged events (e.g., admin:impersonate)
  • Try emitting privileged actions after joining standard channels

Multi-Tenant

  • Actions requiring tenant admin enforced only by header/subdomain; attempt cross-tenant admin actions by switching selectors with same token

Microservices

  • Internal RPCs trust upstream checks; reach them through exposed endpoints or SSRF; verify each service re-enforces authz

Bypass Techniques

Header Trust

  • Supply X-User-Id/X-Role/X-Organization headers; remove or contradict token claims; observe which source wins

Route Shadowing

  • Legacy/alternate routes (e.g., /admin/v1 vs /v2/admin) that skip new middleware chains

Idempotency and Retries

  • Retry or replay finalize/approve endpoints that apply state without checking actor on each call

Cache Key Confusion

  • Cached authorization decisions at edge leading to cross-user reuse; test with Vary and session swaps

Testing Methodology

  1. Build Actor × Action matrix - Unauth, basic, premium, staff/admin; enumerate actions per role
  2. Obtain tokens/sessions - For each role
  3. Exercise every action - Across all transports and encodings (JSON, form, multipart), including method overrides
  4. Vary headers and selectors - Org/tenant/project; test behind gateway vs direct-to-service
  5. Include background flows - Job creation/finalization, webhooks, queues; confirm re-validation

Validation

  1. Show a lower-privileged principal successfully invokes a restricted action (same inputs) while the proper role succeeds and another lower role fails
  2. Provide evidence across at least two transports or encodings demonstrating inconsistent enforcement
  3. Demonstrate that removing/altering client-side gates (buttons/flags) does not affect backend success
  4. Include durable state change proof: before/after snapshots, audit logs, and authoritative sources

False Positives

  • Read-only endpoints mislabeled as admin but publicly documented
  • Feature toggles intentionally open to all roles for preview/beta with clear policy
  • Simulated environments where admin endpoints are stubbed with no side effects

Impact

  • Privilege escalation to admin/staff actions
  • Monetary/state impact: refunds/credits/approvals without authorization
  • Tenant-wide configuration changes, impersonation, or data deletion
  • Compliance and audit violations due to bypassed approval workflows

Pro Tips

  1. Start from the role matrix; test every action with basic vs admin tokens across REST/GraphQL/gRPC
  2. Diff middleware stacks between routes; weak chains often exist on legacy or alternate encodings
  3. Inspect gateways for identity header injection; never trust client-provided identity
  4. Treat jobs/webhooks as first-class: finalize/approve must re-check the actor
  5. Prefer minimal PoCs: one request that flips a privileged field or invokes an admin method with a basic token

Summary

Authorization must bind the actor to the specific action at the service boundary on every request and message. UI gates, gateways, or prior steps do not substitute for function-level checks.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

用于对抗样本、模型提取、提示注入、成员推断、训练投毒、LoRA 滥用、LLM 越狱等 AI/ML 相关 CTF 题;触发名:ctf-ai-ml

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

asdfgh1445/ctf-super-hub8372026年10月2日 更新

用于 XSS、SQL 注入、SSTI、SSRF、XXE、JWT、鉴权绕过、文件上传、请求走私、OAuth/OIDC、SAML 与原型污染等 Web 类 CTF 题;触发名:ctf-web

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

asdfgh1445/ctf-super-hub8372026年10月2日 更新

用于缓冲区溢出、格式化字符串、堆利用、ROP、ret2libc、shellcode、内核利用、seccomp 绕过与沙箱逃逸等 pwn 类 CTF 题;触发名:ctf-pwn

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

asdfgh1445/ctf-super-hub8372026年10月2日 更新

用于 RSA、AES、ECC、格攻击、LWE、CVP、Coppersmith、Pollard、Wiener、填充预言机、GCM、KDF、伪随机数与零知识证明等密码学和数学类 CTF 题;触发名:ctf-crypto

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

asdfgh1445/ctf-super-hub8372026年10月2日 更新

用于公开资料检索、社交媒体分析、地理定位、DNS、用户名枚举、反向图片搜索、历史快照、公开记录与坐标识别等 OSINT 类 CTF 题;触发名:ctf-osint

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

asdfgh1445/ctf-super-hub8372026年10月2日 更新

用于混淆脚本、恶意样本、自定义加密协议、C2 流量、PE/.NET 二进制、RC4/AES 通信、YARA、shellcode、进程注入与反分析等恶意软件类 CTF 题;触发名:ctf-malware

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

asdfgh1445/ctf-super-hub8372026年10月2日 更新

asdfgh1445 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する