本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

client-reverse

Client-side request-signing and anti-bot token reversal for bug bounty — when a request carries a sign/sig/hmac/token/nonce/timestamp/X-Sensor header that Burp Repeater cannot replay, recover the signer just enough to reproduce the request outside the client. Packet-first staging (capture real request → prove replay works → only reverse if replay fails) across the locate→recover→runtime→validation→replay spine. Covers tracing backward from the signature field (writer→builder→entry→source), isolating user-mutable sign inputs (timestamp/nonce/deviceId/body) vs constants (secret key), hooking fetch/XHR in DevTools, JS deobfuscation basics (webpack/wasm/JSVMP), and the bounty payoff: reach the protected API to then hunt IDOR/auth/business-logic. Use when Burp/mitmproxy replay of a signed or anti-bot-gated request fails and you suspect a client-computed field is blocking you.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md18.7 KB
  • references/browser-js-signing.md6.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

CLIENT-SIDE REQUEST-SIGNING / ANTI-BOT TOKEN REVERSAL

You hit a request you cannot replay. Burp Repeater returns 401 invalid signature or 403 bot detected even though the browser/app does it fine. There is a sign, sig, X-Signature, _token, nonce, X-Acf-Sensor-Data, or encrypted body the client computes. This skill recovers just enough of that signer to reproduce the request outside the client.

Why a bug bounty hunter cares: the signature is not the bug. The signature is the lock on the door. Behind it is an API the program assumed only their own client would ever reach — so that API is often under-tested for IDOR, BOLA, mass assignment, and business logic. Reversing the signer is the cost of admission; the payout comes from what you fuzz once you're inside. Never report "I reversed your sign algorithm" as a finding on its own — that is N/A. Report the IDOR/auth bug you reached through it.


THE CORE PRINCIPLE: PACKET-FIRST

Reverse engineering is a blocker-resolution step, not the default entrypoint. Capture the real request first. Prove whether it already replays. Only reverse the signer if replay actually fails.

Most hunters waste hours decompiling JS for a "signature" that turns out to be replayable as-is, or gated by a timestamp that's valid for 5 minutes. Run this gate before opening DevTools Sources:

1. Capture the real request    (Burp/mitmproxy proxy, or DevTools → Network → Copy as cURL)
2. Replay it UNCHANGED          (paste cURL into terminal, or Burp Repeater)
   → 200 / works?  → IT'S NOT SIGNED. Skip all reversing. Go fuzz it.
3. Replay it again 5 min later  → still 200?  → no freshness check (replay window is wide/infinite)
4. Mutate ONE non-signed field  (e.g. change an `id` in the body, keep sign as-is)
   → 200?  → the sign does NOT cover that field → tamper freely, no reversing needed
   → 401?  → the sign covers it → NOW you reverse (continue to STAGES below)

Steps 2–4 alone kill ~half of "I need to reverse this" assumptions. A signature that omits the payload or endpoint, or never expires, is itself the bug — see the CoinMate pattern in Real Paid Examples.


STAGE SPINE: locate → recover → runtime → validation → replay

Pick the stage from engineering state, not from clue words. "I see the word sign" does not mean you're in recover. You are in locate until you can point at the exact line that writes the signature.

intake → evidence → locate → recover → runtime → validation → replay
StageEnter when...GoalExit when...
locatethe signing function / write boundary is unprovenfind where the sign field is written and what feeds ityou can point at writer ← builder ← entry ← source
recoverboundary is real but the code is obfuscated/opaquede-shell only the layer blocking you (webpack/wasm/JSVMP)you have a readable or callable signer contract
runtimecode is clear but browser-exec ≠ your-exec divergefind the first divergence (missing object/state/anti-debug)local run reproduces browser sign output
validationremaining work is equivalence proofmatch checkpoints, not just final outputsign(input) == observed for fresh inputs
replaysign reproduces outside the clientBurp/Python baseline request you can fuzza stable request you can mutate for IDOR/auth

Carry a one-line handoff between stages. Do not promote a guess to a fact:

--- Stage Handoff ---
From: locate  To: recover
Proven: sign written at app.min.js:1, line ~4021; inputs = ts, nonce, JSON body, deviceId
Open:   builder is inside webpack module 5f3 behind a string-table — need to de-shell that one module
Invalid: assumption that deviceId was constant (it rotates per session)

STAGE 1 — LOCATE: trace backward from the signature field

You know the output (the sign value on the wire). Walk backward to the source. Keep each layer distinct:

writer  <-  builder  <-  entry  <-  source
  • writer — the line that finally puts sign into the body/header/query/cookie/WS frame
  • builder — the transform: HMAC, MD5, AES, sort-then-concat, JSON.stringify ordering
  • entry — the UI action / callback / response that kicks off the chain
  • source — what feeds the inputs: upstream response, localStorage, cookie, Date.now(), crypto.getRandomValues, user input

Browser: find the writer in Chrome DevTools

# 1. XHR/fetch breakpoint — break the moment the signed request fires
DevTools → Sources → XHR/fetch Breakpoints → + → paste the endpoint path (e.g. /api/order)
   trigger the action → execution pauses inside the request stack
   → walk UP the Call Stack panel: the frame that mutates headers/body is your writer

# 2. Search the bundle for the field name (catches the writer fast)
DevTools → Sources → Ctrl+Shift+F (search all loaded scripts)
   search: "sign"  "X-Signature"  ".sign ="  "headers["  "signature"
   click {} (pretty-print) on the minified file so line numbers are stable

# 3. DOM/event breakpoint when a click triggers it
DevTools → Elements → right-click the button → Break on → subtree/attribute modifications

Strong first observation points (where to put the breakpoint)

Sink (where sign lands)First place to prove
request body fieldfinal JSON.stringify / submit / fetch(body=...)
request headerthe headers[...] = or setRequestHeader call
JS-set cookiethe document.cookie = setter
WebSocket framethe final envelope object right before ws.send(...)
anti-bot blob (X-Sensor-Data, _px)the SDK init() and the getter that returns the blob

Do NOT broad-deobfuscate before the boundary is real. Keyword hits are not proof — many bundles ship sign strings that never run.


STAGE 2 — RECOVER: de-shell only what blocks you

Enter only after the boundary is proven and the only remaining blocker is that the code is unreadable. Reduce the single layer in your way — never the whole bundle.

Shell you hitWhat it meansMinimal move
webpack bootstrapmodules wrapped in __webpack_require__break inside the target module, read the local closure — don't unpack the whole bundle
string-array obfuscation_0x4a2b[12] lookupsin console, print the decoder array; or set a breakpoint and read decoded values live
worker / postMessage bridgesign runs in a Web Workerbreakpoint the worker script; treat postMessage payload as the contract
wasm loadersign math compiled to wasmhook the JS↔wasm boundary; capture inputs/outputs rather than decompiling wasm
JSVMP (custom bytecode VM)a dispatcher loop interpreting bytesdo not reverse the VM — go runtime: hook inputs+output and treat sign as a black box

The black-box shortcut beats decompilation 90% of the time. You almost never need to understand the HMAC math. You need the input tuple and a way to call the function. Capture sign(input) → output pairs at runtime; if you can call the page's own signer, you never have to reimplement it.

Reimplement vs reuse the page's signer

// REUSE — if the signer is a reachable function, just call it from the console.
// Works when the page exposes it or you grab a reference at a breakpoint.
window.__sign = signFn;                 // assign at a breakpoint inside the builder
window.__sign({id: 999, ts: Date.now()})// → get a valid sig for ANY payload you want

// HOOK to log every real sign(input)->output the app produces (no reimplementation):
(function(){
  const orig = CryptoSigner.prototype.sign;        // adapt to the real object/method
  CryptoSigner.prototype.sign = function(...a){
    const out = orig.apply(this, a);
    console.log('SIGN', JSON.stringify(a), '=>', out);  // copy pairs for offline replay
    return out;
  };
})();

STAGE 3 — ISOLATE THE INPUTS (the part that decides if replay is even possible)

For every input to the signer, classify it. This is the whole game — it tells you what you can mutate and whether you even need the secret.

InputTypeAttacker-mutable?Implication
timestamp / tsper-requestyes (you set it)fine — regenerate per replay; check the validity window
nonce / requestIdper-request randomyesfine — generate fresh; check if server enforces uniqueness (replay protection)
deviceId / uuidper-sessionyes (one value, reusable)grab once, pin it — usually constant for your session
request body / pathper-requestyesthe prize — if sign covers it, you mutate body + re-sign to fuzz IDOR/mass-assignment
secret key / appSecretconstant, baked inno (you extract it)if it's in the JS bundle / APK, extraction = full forge ability for any request
DECISION:
  secret is in the client (hardcoded in JS or APK strings)
      → you can re-sign ANY request offline → full replay, fuzz everything
  secret is server-side only, but you can call the page's signer function
      → you can sign any payload while the page is open → replay via headless browser bridge
  secret is server-side AND signer is uncallable (heavy anti-debug)
      → you may only replay UNCHANGED requests
      → then test: does the sign omit the path/body? (CoinMate pattern) → forge anyway
      → does it never expire? → replay-window bug, report that

Hunt the bundle for a baked secret before doing anything clever:

# Pull the JS and grep for the secret feeding the signer
wget -q -r -l1 -A '*.js' -P /tmp/js/ "https://target.com" 2>/dev/null
grep -rnoE "appSecret|secretKey|signKey|HMAC|hmac|['\"][A-Za-z0-9+/]{24,}={0,2}['\"]" /tmp/js/ | head
# Cross-reference with /secrets-hunt --js-bundle for entropy-scored hits

STAGE 4 — RUNTIME & VALIDATION: prove your sign == the app's sign

If you reimplemented the signer in Python, prove equivalence on a fresh input before trusting it. Compare checkpoints, not just the final byte:

import hmac, hashlib, json, time

def sign(body: dict, ts: str, nonce: str, secret: bytes) -> str:
    # Reproduce the EXACT canonicalization the JS does — order, separators, encoding.
    # Get these by reading the builder, NOT by guessing.
    payload = json.dumps(body, separators=(',', ':'), sort_keys=False)  # JS JSON.stringify keeps INSERTION order, not sorted — set sort_keys=True ONLY if the builder explicitly sorts keys
    msg = f"{ts}{nonce}{payload}".encode()                            # match JS concat order!
    return hmac.new(secret, msg, hashlib.sha256).hexdigest()

# VALIDATE: feed an input you captured from the browser, compare to the observed sig.
# checkpoints that must each match: canonical body string → message tuple → final digest
assert sign(captured_body, captured_ts, captured_nonce, SECRET) == observed_sig

The two killers are almost always (a) JSON key ordering / separator whitespace, and (b) concatenation order of the input fields. If your digest is wrong, diff the pre-hash message string against the one the app builds (log it at a breakpoint), not the output hash.


STAGE 5 — REPLAY: build the request you'll actually fuzz

You are ready only when you can answer all five:

[ ] where is the signed field written?
[ ] which inputs are constants (secret, deviceId) vs per-request (ts, nonce, body)?
[ ] which inputs come from upstream responses / cookies / storage / page lifecycle?
[ ] does request ORDER or session STATE matter (does a prior call seed the nonce)?
[ ] which fields can I mutate and still produce a valid sign?

Then drive it from Python so you can fuzz at scale:

import requests, time, uuid

SECRET = b"extracted_from_bundle"          # or call the page's signer via a headless bridge
DEVICE = "pinned-session-device-id"

def signed_request(body):
    ts = str(int(time.time()*1000))
    nonce = uuid.uuid4().hex
    sig = sign(body, ts, nonce, SECRET)    # your validated signer from Stage 4
    return requests.post("https://target.com/api/order",
        json=body,
        headers={"X-Timestamp": ts, "X-Nonce": nonce, "X-Signature": sig,
                 "X-Device-Id": DEVICE})

# NOW the bug hunt begins — mutate the body to reach the protected logic:
for victim_id in range(1000, 1100):        # IDOR sweep behind the signature
    r = signed_request({"orderId": victim_id})
    if r.status_code == 200 and "not authorized" not in r.text:
        print(f"IDOR: read order {victim_id}", r.json())

Bridge option when the secret is server-side: keep a headless browser open, expose the page's own sign() via a tiny local HTTP shim, and have your Python fuzzer call out to it per request. You never reimplement crypto — the app signs for you.


ANTI-BOT TOKENS (Akamai / DataDome / PerimeterX / hCaptcha-style)

Same spine, harder shell. These ship an SDK that emits an opaque sensor blob (X-Acf-Sensor-Data, _px, datadome cookie). Two realistic paths for a bounty hunter:

  • Reuse, don't reverse. Grab one fresh valid token from a real browser session and replay it within its (short) validity window. Enough to prove an authenticated/protected endpoint is reachable and then demonstrate IDOR/auth there. You usually do not need to generate tokens at scale to prove one bug.
  • Headless bridge. Drive a real browser (Selenium/Playwright) to mint the token, hand it to your Python fuzzer. Standard tooling, no SDK reversing.

Full reversal of Akamai v3 sensor-data (PRNG-shuffled, file-hash + cookie-hash seeded) or PerimeterX's compiled SDK is a week-long research effort — out of scope for a single bounty. If the anti-bot itself is misconfigured (token never expires, token from accountA validates accountB's requests, the protected endpoint is also reachable on a sibling host with no anti-bot), report that — it's a real finding without reversing anything. See the Stack→sibling-host idea in web2-recon.


WHAT'S SUBMITTABLE vs N/A

FindingVerdict
"I reversed your client signing algorithm"N/A — not a vuln by itself
Signed request replays unchanged forever (no timestamp/nonce freshness)Low/Medium — replay-attack window; report it
Sign omits endpoint/payload → forge requests without the secret (CoinMate pattern)Medium/High — request forgery
Secret key hardcoded in JS bundle / APK → forge any requestMedium alone; High/Critical chained to the API you unlock
Reached a protected API via reversed sign → IDOR / BOLA / mass assignment found thereHigh/Critical — the real prize; report the downstream bug
One user's anti-bot token validates another user's requestMedium — broken token binding

The deliverable is almost never the signing weakness. It is the access-control or business-logic bug on the endpoint the signature was guarding. Reach it, then run the IDOR / Broken Auth / Mass Assignment / Business Logic playbooks from web2-vuln-classes.


TOOL MAP (standard tools — no special MCP needed)

NeedTool
capture the real requestBurp Suite proxy, or mitmproxy, or DevTools Network → Copy as cURL
break on the signed requestChrome DevTools → Sources → XHR/fetch Breakpoints
read minified codeDevTools {} pretty-print + Ctrl+Shift+F global search
hook fetch/XHR / log sign()DevTools console snippet (Object.defineProperty / method override)
grep bundle for the secretwget -r -A '*.js' + grep, or /secrets-hunt --js-bundle
find hidden endpoints in JSLinkFinder / jsluice (see web2-recon)
replay + fuzz at scalePython requests (Stage 5 template)
mint anti-bot tokensSelenium / Playwright headless bridge
mobile app variant (signer in APK)apktool + jadx (static), objection / frida CLI (runtime hook) — same locate→recover→runtime→replay spine, packet-first

Mobile note: for an authorized Android app, the packet-first rule still wins — drive the app, watch Burp/mitmproxy, and only jadx/frida the APK when the packet is encrypted or unreplayable. Decompiling first is the rookie move.


REAL PAID EXAMPLES

  • CoinMate API (HackerOne, disclosed) — HMAC signature verification omitted the endpoint and payload, so requests could be forged that appeared legitimate without the correct secret (request forgery via incomplete signature coverage). This is the canonical "the sign doesn't actually cover what you'd mutate" win — find it with Stage 0 step 4.
  • Replay window on HMAC-SHA256 headers (API pentest pattern, disclosed write-ups) — custom auth headers signed with HMAC but lacking timestamp/nonce freshness; captured valid requests replay hours/days later. Prove it with Stage 0 steps 2–3, no reversing required.
  • PerimeterX iOS SDK reversal (public research) — compiled-to-ARM bot SDK reversed to a working token generator in ~1 week, disproving "compiled = unreverseable." Cited here as the realistic effort ceiling: pattern seen across anti-bot bypass research — for a single bounty, prefer token-reuse or a headless bridge over full SDK reversal.
  • Hardcoded HMAC secret in Android APK (mobile API pattern, disclosed write-ups) — secret extracted from the APK lets an attacker sign arbitrary API requests, fully bypassing request validation. Find it with the Stage 3 bundle/APK secret grep.

Cross-reference: once you're through the signature, run IDOR, Broken Auth / Access Control, Mass Assignment, and Business Logic from web2-vuln-classes; use web2-recon for hidden-endpoint and sibling-host discovery; validate with the 7-Question Gate before reporting.

See references/browser-js-signing.md for the full browser-JS staging detail, the boundary model, and handoff-card discipline.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Black-box security audit of a DEPLOYED AI agent (not the MCP server behind it) — tool-call hijacking, cross-session memory poisoning, confused-deputy via connected tools, agent-to-agent IDOR, excessive agency / unconfirmed destructive actions, and privilege compromise where the agent holds broader perms than the user. Use when the target is a live assistant/agent product with tool access (bookings, email, payments, file/RAG, browsing) rather than a raw LLM chat box or an MCP server you can read.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

awarexone/Agentic-Bug-Hunter5,3152026年10月10日 更新

argus

無料

Argus — the all-seeing scanner suite. Six automated scanners for high-value web + LLM bug classes — CORS misconfiguration (origin reflection / null / credentialed read), CRLF & host-header injection, NoSQL injection (operator auth-bypass / $where blind), JWT attacks (alg:none / RS256→HS256 confusion / secret crack), out-of-band confirmation of blind SSRF/XXE/SQLi/RCE/Log4Shell via interactsh, and an LLM red-team corpus (prompt-injection / jailbreak / system-prompt leak / exfil / indirect injection). Use when a target exposes a JSON API, a login endpoint, JWT auth, a parameter that might reach the server, a chatbot/agent, or any endpoint suspected of a blind/out-of-band bug.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

awarexone/Agentic-Bug-Hunter5,3152026年10月10日 更新

Use at the START of any bug bounty hunting session, when switching targets, or when feeling lost about what to do next. Master orchestrator that combines the 5-phase non-linear hunting workflow with the critical thinking framework (developer psychology, anomaly detection, What-If experiments). Routes to all other skills based on current hunting phase. Also use when asking "what should I do next" or "where am I in the process."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

awarexone/Agentic-Bug-Hunter5,3152026年10月10日 更新

Complete bug bounty workflow — recon, pre-hunt learning, vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining, bypass tables, language-specific grep patterns, and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

awarexone/Agentic-Bug-Hunter5,3152026年10月10日 更新

Complete bug bounty workflow — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — starting a new target, doing recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports. 中文触发词:漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

awarexone/Agentic-Bug-Hunter5,3152026年10月10日 更新

CI/CD pipeline security hunting — GitHub Actions workflow injection, secret exfiltration, self-hosted runner poisoning, dependency confusion, OIDC token theft, and supply chain attacks. Covers sisakulint scanning, manual workflow analysis, and chaining CI/CD bugs into critical findings. Use when a target has public repos, GitHub Actions, CircleCI, Jenkins, or GitLab CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

awarexone/Agentic-Bug-Hunter5,3152026年10月10日 更新

awarexone のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する