本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

tf-best-practices

Best-practice authoring guidance AND a read-only policy gate for AWS Terraform generated by a migration skill. Load during any phase that writes a terraform/ directory — first as the "what to emit" posture rules + security-baseline spec, then after writing as the deterministic policy verdict. Read-only: it reports whether the generated Terraform passes; it never edits .tf files, never touches .phase-status.json, and never decides phase completion. Complements (does not replace) terraform fmt/init/validate.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(39)

  • SKILL.md12.3 KB
  • .gitignore51 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/bad-db-sg-public-quoted-port/vpc.tf514 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/bad-db-sg-public/vpc.tf356 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/bad-elasticache-cluster-redis-unencrypted/cache.tf389 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/bad-elasticache-unencrypted/cache.tf422 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/bad-heroku-eb-elasticache/cache.tf834 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/bad-http-forward/compute.tf556 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/bad-rds-public-brace-in-comment/main.tf690 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/bad-rds-public-closing-brace/main.tf692 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/bad-rds-public-interpolated-brace/rds.tf903 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/bad-rds-public-unencrypted/database.tf372 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/bad-sg-public-ipv6/vpc.tf1.1 KB
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/bad-sg-public-ssh/vpc.tf537 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/bad-wildcard-iam-listform/security.tf470 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/bad-wildcard-iam/security.tf381 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-db-sg-scoped/vpc.tf986 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-elasticache-cluster-memcached/cache.tf372 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-elasticache-cluster-redis-encrypted/cache.tf601 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-elasticache-encrypted/cache.tf749 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-heroku-eb-codepipeline/pipeline.tf295 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-heroku-eb-loadbalanced/compute.tf2.6 KB
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-heroku-eb-loadbalanced/database.tf839 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-heroku-eb-loadbalanced/security.tf899 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-heroku-eb-only/compute.tf1.5 KB
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-heroku-eb-singleinstance/compute.tf1.8 KB
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-https-redirect/compute.tf1008 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-iam-scoped-list/security.tf573 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-internet-nlb/compute.tf621 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-quoted-port-https/compute.tf1.3 KB
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-rds-private-encrypted/database.tf607 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-scoped-iam/security.tf744 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-sg-ipv6-scoped/vpc.tf1.0 KB
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/good-sg-public-webapp/vpc.tf989 B
  • fixtures/terraform-policy/internal-alb-only/compute.tf555 B
  • references/security-posture-rules.md16.0 KB
  • references/terraform-validation.md9.1 KB
  • scripts/test_validate_terraform_policy.py33.6 KB
  • scripts/validate-terraform-policy.py43.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

tf-best-practices — Generated-IaC posture rules + read-only policy gate

A shared authoring guide and verdict producer, not a workflow. It answers two questions for a phase that generates AWS Terraform:

  1. Before writing — "what security posture must the generated terraform/ follow?" (the posture rules + the baseline.tf account-hardening spec)
  2. After writing — "does the generated terraform/ pass policy?" (a deterministic, read-only verdict + a machine-readable report)

Routing — load the part that matches your context

This skill is entered at two touchpoints in the caller's Generate flow, with the caller's own terraform-authoring work in between. The caller states which touchpoint it is at when it loads this skill, and reads the corresponding part:

Caller contextLoadWhy
About to author terraform/ (before writing)Part 1 → references/security-posture-rules.mdThe "what to emit" AWS authoring rules (gate-enforced + authoring-only + compliance-conditional).
terraform/ written, ready to validate (after writing)Part 2 → references/terraform-validation.md + run the gate scriptThe fmt → init → validate → policy protocol and the read-only verdict.

Everything this skill states is source-cloud-agnostic (pure AWS Terraform). Any GCP/Heroku detection or artifact reading is the caller's job; where a rule needs a caller-known fact (e.g. declared compliance frameworks), the caller passes it as a caller-context signal — see references/security-posture-rules.md § Caller-context signals.

Boundary (read this first)

This unit is a verdict producer, never a mutator. Its entire write surface is the JSON verdict it is asked to emit. Specifically it MUST NOT:

  • edit, format, or rewrite any .tf file (the caller owns remediation),
  • read or write .phase-status.json or any run-state file (interpreter-owned),
  • decide whether a phase may complete, or prompt the user (caller policy).

The caller (a migration skill's Generate phase) owns: the fix-and-retry loop that edits the .tf it generated, terraform fmt auto-apply, the retry/skip/abort prompt, the Phase Completion gate, and every .phase-status.json write. See the consuming skill's generate phase for how the verdict feeds those decisions.

Consumers: gcp-to-aws (prose Generate) and heroku-to-aws (DSL Generate). The contract is source-agnostic; each caller wires the two touchpoints in its own Generate idiom — gcp-to-aws as prose steps, heroku-to-aws as a fragment step plus a fail-closed _postconditions assert enforced by the interpreter.

Part 1 — Authoring posture (load before writing terraform/)

Emit generated Terraform that satisfies the posture in references/security-posture-rules.md.

These are the "what good AWS Terraform looks like" rules. Following them makes the Part 2 gate pass by construction. This unit does not read the caller's artifacts — it consumes only caller-context signals the caller passes in.

Scope. security-posture-rules.md covers, in three tiers:

  • Gate-enforced (Part 2 verifies statically): ALB TLS, no-public-database, RDS + ElastiCache encryption-at-rest, no-public-DB-port ingress, no-public admin/datastore-port ingress, no-wildcard-IAM.
  • Authoring-only (not gate-checkable, still required): deletion_protection, master-password-via-Secrets-Manager, S3 hardening, Fargate/EKS/ECR settings, private-subnet placement, backups, baseline monitoring.
  • Compliance-conditional (emitted when the caller declares soc2/pci/hipaa/fedramp): VPC flow logs, S3 access logging, secret rotation, customer-managed KMS.

Still the caller's own generation concern (candidates to migrate here later): the account-hardening baseline.tf layer (CloudTrail, GuardDuty, Config, Security Hub).

Part 2 — Policy gate (run after writing terraform/)

Run the read-only checker against the generated directory. Resolve the script path relative to the plugin root ($PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/tf-best-practices/scripts/...), the same convention the plugin uses for its other scripts:

python3 "$PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/tf-best-practices/scripts/validate-terraform-policy.py" "$TERRAFORM_DIR" --json "$VERDICT_PATH"
  • $TERRAFORM_DIR — required, caller-supplied: the generated terraform/ directory (e.g. $MIGRATION_DIR/terraform). This skill never defaults or discovers it — the caller always passes the path it wrote Terraform to.
  • --json $VERDICT_PATH — optional; writes a machine-readable verdict the caller can merge into its own validation-report.json.

The policy check is one stage of a larger validation flow (fmt → init → validate → policy). The full protocol — including offline-fallback behavior and how the policy verdict maps into a validation-report.json — is documented in references/terraform-validation.md. That protocol is descriptive: the caller owns the fmt/init/validate execution, the fix-and-retry loop, and the report write; this unit contributes only the read-only policy stage + verdict shape.

Exit codes → caller action

ExitstdoutMeaningCaller does
0POLICY_OKposture satisfiedproceed
1POLICY_FAILviolations presentread violations[], edit the named .tf sites, re-run (caller's retry budget)
2(usage error)bad path / IOsurface to user; do not treat as pass

Verdict shape (--json)

{
  "check": "policy",
  "policy_status": "POLICY_OK | POLICY_FAIL",
  "violations": [
    {
      "check": "policy",
      "rule": "alb_https_listener | alb_http_redirect | no_tf_files",
      "file": "compute.tf",
      "line": 7,
      "severity": "error",
      "summary": "human-readable violation",
      "fix_hint": "concrete remediation the caller can apply"
    }
  ]
}

Each violations[] entry is actionable evidence — file + line + fix_hint tell the caller exactly what to edit. The caller applies the edit; this unit only reports.

Policy rules enforced today

Every rule is fail-open on ambiguity — it fires only on unambiguous, in-block literal evidence, so a valid stack is never falsely blocked (a POLICY_FAIL is a hard completion gate for the caller, so a false positive would block a real migration).

Internet-facing ALB TLS posture (an ALB is internet-facing when internal is absent, false, or variable-driven — fail-safe):

  • alb_https_listener — must have an HTTPS listener on 443 with certificate_arn and a forward action.
  • alb_http_redirect — an HTTP :80 listener must redirect to HTTPS, never forward to targets. Internal ALBs (internal = true) are exempt.

Elastic Beanstalk ALBs are invisible to these rules. The ALB rules inspect standalone aws_lb_listener blocks. An EB LoadBalanced environment provisions its ALB from aws_elastic_beanstalk_environment setting blocks, which the static checker does not read — so a pure-EB design passes the ALB rules vacuously (no listener to inspect). EB listener/TLS posture is therefore authoring-only, not gate-enforced. (Fixtures good-heroku-eb-only and good-heroku-eb-singleinstance document this; good-heroku-eb-loadbalanced carries a standalone ALB so the listener rules are exercised on real blocks.)

Managed database exposure & encryption (aws_db_instance, aws_rds_cluster):

  • rds_not_public — must not set publicly_accessible = true (absent/variable → fail-open).
  • rds_encryption_at_rest — must set storage_encrypted = true; missing or literal false fires (RDS defaults to unencrypted), variable-driven fails open. S3 is not checked (default SSE-S3 since Jan 2023).

ElastiCache encryption (aws_elasticache_replication_group, Redis aws_elasticache_cluster):

  • elasticache_encryption_at_rest — a replication group must set at_rest_encryption_enabled = true; missing or literal false fires, variable-driven fails open.
  • elasticache_cluster_encryption — a Redis-engine aws_elasticache_cluster (single-node: engine = "redis", no replication_group_id) must set BOTH at_rest_encryption_enabled = true and transit_encryption_enabled = true; missing or literal false on either fires, variable-driven fails open. engine = "memcached" clusters (and variable-driven/absent engine) are exempt — Memcached does not support these attributes.

Security group ingress:

  • db_sg_no_public_ingress — an inline aws_security_group ingress covering 5432/3306 must not allow 0.0.0.0/0 or ::/0.
  • sg_no_public_admin_ingress — an inline ingress must not open a curated never-public admin/datastore port (22, 3389, 6379, 11211, 27017, 9200/9300, 5601) to 0.0.0.0/0 or ::/0. Web (80/443) and app/game ports are not flagged; DB ports are handled by the rule above. Both check cidr_blocks and ipv6_cidr_blocks independently, so a benign IPv4 list does not mask an open IPv6 one. Both: separate aws_security_group_rule / aws_vpc_security_group_ingress_rule resources fail open (not correlated).

IAM least-privilege (aws_iam_policy, aws_iam_role_policy, aws_iam_group_policy, aws_iam_user_policy):

  • no_wildcard_iam — an Allow statement must not use Action/Resource "*". The one narrow exception is an isolated elasticbeanstalk:CreateStorageLocation statement with Resource = "*" because AWS does not support resource-level permissions for that action. aws_iam_policy_document data sources and assume-role trust policies fail open.

The checker is a zero-dependency static HCL reader (no terraform init, no provider download) — it runs even when the registry is unreachable. It uses brace-depth matching for nested blocks, so a valid HTTPS listener written with a nested forward { ... } block is not a false failure.

Fixtures (also the checker's regression suite)

fixtures/terraform-policy/ holds intentionally-shaped Terraform used by scripts/test_validate_terraform_policy.py:

  • bad-http-forward/ — internet-facing ALB that forwards plaintext HTTP → MUST POLICY_FAIL.
  • internal-alb-only/ — internal ALB on HTTP → MUST POLICY_OK (HTTP allowed internally).
  • good-https-redirect/ — the correct pattern → POLICY_OK.

These are deliberately non-compliant test data (never deployed). They are excluded from the repo-wide checkov scan via .checkov.yaml skip-path; do not "harden" them — doing so breaks the tests that assert the failure paths.

Verification

# from skills/tf-best-practices/
uv run --python 3.12 --with pytest python -m pytest scripts/test_validate_terraform_policy.py -q

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Entry point for AI-agent work on AWS: pick a runtime, plan a migration for existing workloads, and build an executable POC — one phased flow. Triggers on: which runtime for my agent, AgentCore vs ECS vs EKS vs Lambda, AgentCore vs Lambda MicroVMs, deploy an AI agent on AWS, agent architecture on AWS, I have an agent idea what do I build, move/migrate my agents to AWS, agent migration plan, add AgentCore services (memory, gateway, identity, policy, observability) to an agent already on AWS, Temporal on AWS (migrate/run Temporal workers on AWS, a service orchestrated by Temporal, Temporal Cloud vs self-hosted). Temporal Workflow code is never rewritten into Step Functions. Requires at least one agentic component — a purely non-agent system (plain services, batch jobs, HTTP endpoints, non-agent Temporal Activities) is out of scope, redirected to gcp-to-aws / heroku-to-aws / llm-to-bedrock. Not for: compute/data migration with no AI agent; pure LLM SDK rewrite (use llm-to-bedrock); per-model pricing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aws/agent-toolkit-for-aws2,8492026年10月12日 更新

Use to extend an existing agent project with memory, app integration, VPC, multi-agent, migration, model, browser, code interpreter, payments, or resource removal. Triggers: "add memory", "remember across sessions", "call agent from app", "invoke agent from code", "agent auth", "streaming", "VPC", "VPC connectivity", "can't reach from VPC", "multi-agent", "A2A", "A2A auth", "orchestrator not delegating", "specialist not called", "migrate Bedrock Agent", "migration issue", "change model", "browser tool", "code interpreter", "delete agent", "tear down", "agentcore remove", "cross-account memory", "add payments capability to my agent", "wire payments plugin", "integrate x402 payments with the agent I'm building", "add MPP payments", "Machine Payments Protocol". External APIs via Gateway: use agents-connect. New project: use agents-get-started. CLI/dev-server errors: use agents-debug. Runtime x402/MPP payments: use agents-pay. Migration-specific Strands vs LangGraph routes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aws/agent-toolkit-for-aws2,8492026年10月12日 更新

Use when connecting your agent to external APIs, tools, or services via Gateway, or restricting tool access with Cedar policies. Handles gateway setup, target types, outbound auth (OAuth, API key, IAM), credentials, and Cedar policy authoring. Triggers on: "connect to API", "add gateway", "connect to MCP server", "Lambda tools", "OpenAPI", "gateway target", "Cedar policy", "restrict tools", "policy engine", "gateway auth error", "store API key", "outbound credential", "env var API key", "API key None after deploy", "credential not available after deploy", "should this be a gateway target", "give my agent tools", "add tools to agent". Not for inbound auth (who can call your agent) — use agents-harden. Not for debugging agent behavior — use agents-debug. Not for VPC networking errors (agent can't reach APIs due to VPC) — use agents-build. Not for creating or hosting a new MCP server project — use agents-get-started.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aws/agent-toolkit-for-aws2,8492026年10月12日 更新

Use when your agent or environment is broken — wrong answers, errors, timeouts, tool failures, or CLI issues. Reads traces and logs to diagnose root causes. Also checks prerequisites when the CLI itself isn't working. Triggers on: "agent not working", "wrong answer", "agent error", "tool call failing", "debug agent", "check logs", "read traces", "broken", "500 error", "424 error", "model access denied", "command not found", "stuck in DELETING", "maxVms exceeded", "cold start diagnosis", "cold start slow", "agentcore create error", "create failed", "exit code 7", "connection refused local dev". Not for deploy failures — use agents-deploy. Not for performance tuning without errors — use agents-optimize. Not for VPC configuration — use agents-build. Not for observability setup or missing logs — use agents-optimize.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aws/agent-toolkit-for-aws2,8492026年10月12日 更新

Use when deploying your agent to AWS, or when a deploy has failed. Handles pre-flight validation, CDK/IAM/quota error diagnosis, version management, rollback, and canary deployments. Triggers on: "deploy my agent", "agentcore deploy", "deploy failed", "CDK error", "rollback", "canary deploy", "pin version", "redeploy", "deploy stuck". Not for production hardening — use agents-harden. Not for adding capabilities before deploy — use agents-build or agents-connect. Not for VPC configuration errors — use agents-build.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aws/agent-toolkit-for-aws2,8492026年10月12日 更新

Use when a developer wants to create a new agent project or get started with AgentCore. Handles framework selection, project scaffolding, first deploy, and first invocation. Triggers on: "build an agent", "create an agent", "get started", "new project", "agentcore create", "which framework", "Strands vs LangGraph", "hello world agent", "first agent", "create MCP server", "host MCP server", "agentcore dev", "dev server", "what port", "local development". Not for adding capabilities to existing projects — use agents-build or agents-connect. Strands vs LangGraph in a migration context routes to agents-build, not here. Connecting to an existing MCP server routes to agents-connect, not here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aws/agent-toolkit-for-aws2,8492026年10月12日 更新

aws のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する