Conduct periodic access reviews and certifications. Implement access governance and recertification workflows. Use when managing access compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Harden AI/LLM deployments against prompt injection, data exfiltration, model theft, and supply chain attacks. Covers input validation, output filtering, access control, model API security, and compliance controls for production AI systems.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Secure LLM and AI systems against prompt injection, jailbreaks, data leakage, and supply chain threats in production environments.
Use this skill when:
Threat Risk Control
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Prompt injection System prompt override Input sanitization, separate context
Data exfiltration PII in model outputs Output filtering, DLP scanning
Jailbreaking Policy bypass Content moderation, guardrails
Model theft Weight extraction via API Rate limiting, access controls
Training data poisoning Backdoored fine-tuned model Dataset validation, provenance
Supply chain attack Malicious model weights Signature verification, scanning
Insecure output XSS/SQLi from LLM response Output encoding, parameterized queries
import re
from typing import Optional
INJECTION_PATTERNS = [
r"ignore\s+(all\s+)?(previous|prior|above)\s+instructions",
r"you\s+are\s+now\s+",
r"new\s+instructions?:",
r"system\s+prompt",
r"forget\s+everything",
r"act\s+as\s+",
r"jailbreak",
r"dan\s+mode",
r"<\s*system\s*>",
r"\[INST\]",
]
def detect_prompt_injection(user_input: str) -> tuple[bool, Optional[str]]:
"""Return (is_suspicious, matched_pattern)."""
normalized = user_input.lower().strip()
for pattern in INJECTION_PATTERNS:
if re.search(pattern, normalized, re.IGNORECASE):
return True, pattern
return False, None
def sanitize_user_input(user_input: str, max_length: int = 4000) -> str:
"""Sanitize input before passing to LLM."""
# Truncate
user_input = user_input[:max_length]
# Remove null bytes and control characters
user_input = re.sub(r'[\x00-\x08\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x1f\x7f]', '', user_input)
# Check for injection
suspicious, pattern = detect_prompt_injection(user_input)
if suspicious:
raise ValueError(f"Potential prompt injection detected: {pattern}")
return user_input
# guardrails.yaml
from nemoguardrails import RailsConfig, LLMRails
config = RailsConfig.from_path("./guardrails-config")
rails = LLMRails(config)
async def safe_llm_call(user_message: str) -> str:
response = await rails.generate_async(
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": user_message}]
)
return response["content"]
# guardrails-config/config.yml
models:
- type: main
engine: openai
model: gpt-4o-mini
rails:
input:
flows:
- check jailbreak
- check sensitive data
output:
flows:
- check output for PII
- check output for harmful content
import re
from presidio_analyzer import AnalyzerEngine
from presidio_anonymizer import AnonymizerEngine
analyzer = AnalyzerEngine()
anonymizer = AnonymizerEngine()
PII_ENTITIES = ["PERSON", "EMAIL_ADDRESS", "PHONE_NUMBER", "CREDIT_CARD",
"US_SSN", "IBAN_CODE", "IP_ADDRESS", "LOCATION"]
def scrub_pii_from_output(text: str) -> str:
"""Remove PII from LLM output before returning to user."""
results = analyzer.analyze(text=text, entities=PII_ENTITIES, language="en")
if not results:
return text
anonymized = anonymizer.anonymize(text=text, analyzer_results=results)
return anonymized.text
def validate_output_safety(output: str) -> bool:
"""Check output doesn't contain prompt injection artifacts."""
dangerous_patterns = [
r"<\s*script\s*>", # XSS
r"javascript:", # XSS
r";\s*(DROP|DELETE|INSERT)",# SQLi
r"\$\{.*\}", # template injection
r"`.*`", # command injection in some contexts
]
for pattern in dangerous_patterns:
if re.search(pattern, output, re.IGNORECASE):
return False
return True
from fastapi import FastAPI, HTTPException, Depends, Request
from fastapi.security import HTTPBearer, HTTPAuthorizationCredentials
import jwt
import time
from collections import defaultdict
app = FastAPI()
security = HTTPBearer()
# Rate limiting (per API key)
request_counts = defaultdict(list)
def rate_limit(api_key: str, max_requests: int = 100, window_seconds: int = 60):
now = time.time()
requests = request_counts[api_key]
# Remove old requests outside window
request_counts[api_key] = [t for t in requests if now - t < window_seconds]
if len(request_counts[api_key]) >= max_requests:
raise HTTPException(status_code=429, detail="Rate limit exceeded")
request_counts[api_key].append(now)
async def verify_token(
credentials: HTTPAuthorizationCredentials = Depends(security)
) -> dict:
try:
payload = jwt.decode(credentials.credentials, SECRET_KEY, algorithms=["HS256"])
rate_limit(payload["sub"])
return payload
except jwt.ExpiredSignatureError:
raise HTTPException(status_code=401, detail="Token expired")
except jwt.InvalidTokenError:
raise HTTPException(status_code=401, detail="Invalid token")
@app.post("/v1/chat/completions")
async def chat(request: Request, token: dict = Depends(verify_token)):
body = await request.json()
# Input validation
user_msg = body.get("messages", [{}])[-1].get("content", "")
try:
safe_input = sanitize_user_input(user_msg)
except ValueError as e:
raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail=str(e))
# Call LLM and scrub output
response = await call_llm(safe_input, token["scope"])
response["choices"][0]["message"]["content"] = scrub_pii_from_output(
response["choices"][0]["message"]["content"]
)
return response
# Verify model weights with SHA-256 hash before loading
MODEL_DIR="./models/llama-3.1-8b"
EXPECTED_HASH="sha256:abc123..."
# Generate hash of downloaded model
actual_hash=$(find "$MODEL_DIR" -name "*.safetensors" | sort | xargs sha256sum | sha256sum)
echo "Model hash: $actual_hash"
# Compare (automate in CI/CD)
if [ "$actual_hash" != "$EXPECTED_HASH" ]; then
echo "ERROR: Model hash mismatch — possible tampering!"
exit 1
fi
# Scan model files for embedded malware (ModelScan)
pip install modelscan
modelscan scan -p "$MODEL_DIR"
# Kubernetes NetworkPolicy — isolate LLM API
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: llm-api-isolation
namespace: ai-services
spec:
podSelector:
matchLabels:
app: vllm
policyTypes:
- Ingress
- Egress
ingress:
- from:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
name: backend # only backend can call LLM
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 8000
egress:
- to:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
name: monitoring # metrics only
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 9090
# Block egress to internet — prevent data exfiltration
# (allow only internal cluster traffic)
import structlog
from datetime import datetime, timezone
audit_log = structlog.get_logger("ai.audit")
def log_llm_interaction(
user_id: str,
session_id: str,
model: str,
prompt_tokens: int,
completion_tokens: int,
was_filtered: bool,
injection_detected: bool,
):
audit_log.info(
"llm_interaction",
timestamp=datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(),
user_id=user_id,
session_id=session_id,
model=model,
prompt_tokens=prompt_tokens,
completion_tokens=completion_tokens,
was_filtered=was_filtered,
injection_detected=injection_detected,
# DO NOT log prompt/completion content — PII risk
)
| Issue | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| False positive injection blocks | Overly broad regex | Tune patterns; use ML-based classifier for high-traffic |
| PII in model outputs | Model trained on PII data | Add Presidio scrubbing to output layer |
| API key leakage | Keys in logs or responses | Mask keys in logging; use vault for key storage |
| Model weight tampering | Unverified downloads | Always verify SHA-256; use modelscan |
| Rate limit bypass | Per-IP not per-user | Rate limit on authenticated user ID, not IP |
modelscan on any model downloaded from the internet before serving.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Conduct periodic access reviews and certifications. Implement access governance and recertification workflows. Use when managing access compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instrument AI agents with tracing, token metrics, latency, and cost visibility. Use for reliability and debugging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Secure AI agents against prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration with defense-in-depth controls. Use when building, deploying, or hardening agentic AI systems that invoke tools, access data, or interact with production infrastructure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Secure AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot) with permission boundaries, secret protection, code review gates, and safe sandbox configurations for team environments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use service mesh patterns for AI inference traffic management, mTLS, canary releases, policy enforcement, and cross-cluster resilience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。