Conduct periodic access reviews and certifications. Implement access governance and recertification workflows. Use when managing access compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitor and evaluate RAG systems with retrieval quality metrics, groundedness checks, hallucination detection, and continuous regression testing.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Run retrieval-augmented generation like a measurable production system, not a black box.
# rag_eval.py
"""Evaluate RAG pipeline quality using RAGAS metrics."""
from ragas import evaluate
from ragas.metrics import (
faithfulness,
answer_relevancy,
context_precision,
context_recall,
context_entity_recall,
answer_similarity,
)
from datasets import Dataset
import json
import sys
def load_eval_dataset(path: str) -> Dataset:
"""Load evaluation dataset with required columns."""
with open(path) as f:
data = json.load(f)
return Dataset.from_dict({
"question": [d["question"] for d in data],
"answer": [d["generated_answer"] for d in data],
"contexts": [d["retrieved_contexts"] for d in data],
"ground_truth": [d["reference_answer"] for d in data],
})
def run_evaluation(dataset_path: str, output_path: str):
"""Run full RAGAS evaluation suite."""
dataset = load_eval_dataset(dataset_path)
metrics = [
faithfulness,
answer_relevancy,
context_precision,
context_recall,
context_entity_recall,
answer_similarity,
]
results = evaluate(dataset, metrics=metrics)
# Print summary
print("=== RAG Evaluation Results ===")
for metric_name, score in results.items():
print(f" {metric_name}: {score:.4f}")
# Save detailed results
with open(output_path, "w") as f:
json.dump({
"summary": {k: float(v) for k, v in results.items()},
"dataset_size": len(dataset),
}, f, indent=2)
return results
if __name__ == "__main__":
run_evaluation(sys.argv[1], sys.argv[2])
# groundedness.py
"""Score whether generated answers are grounded in retrieved context."""
from openai import OpenAI
import json
from typing import List
client = OpenAI()
GROUNDEDNESS_PROMPT = """You are evaluating whether an AI answer is fully grounded
in the provided context documents. Score each claim in the answer.
Context documents:
{contexts}
Answer to evaluate:
{answer}
For each distinct claim in the answer, determine:
1. SUPPORTED - the claim is directly supported by the context
2. PARTIALLY_SUPPORTED - the claim is partially supported
3. NOT_SUPPORTED - the claim has no support in the context
Return JSON:
{{
"claims": [
{{"claim": "...", "verdict": "SUPPORTED|PARTIALLY_SUPPORTED|NOT_SUPPORTED", "evidence": "..."}}
],
"groundedness_score": <float 0-1>,
"unsupported_claims": ["..."]
}}
"""
def score_groundedness(answer: str, contexts: List[str]) -> dict:
"""Score groundedness of a single answer against its contexts."""
context_text = "\n---\n".join(
f"[Document {i+1}]: {c}" for i, c in enumerate(contexts)
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": GROUNDEDNESS_PROMPT.format(
contexts=context_text, answer=answer
),
}],
response_format={"type": "json_object"},
temperature=0,
)
return json.loads(response.choices[0].message.content)
def batch_groundedness(eval_data: list) -> dict:
"""Score groundedness for a batch of QA pairs."""
scores = []
unsupported_count = 0
total_claims = 0
for item in eval_data:
result = score_groundedness(
item["generated_answer"],
item["retrieved_contexts"],
)
scores.append(result["groundedness_score"])
unsupported_count += len(result["unsupported_claims"])
total_claims += len(result["claims"])
avg_score = sum(scores) / len(scores) if scores else 0
return {
"average_groundedness": avg_score,
"total_claims": total_claims,
"unsupported_claims": unsupported_count,
"unsupported_rate": unsupported_count / total_claims if total_claims else 0,
"sample_count": len(eval_data),
}
# retrieval_metrics.py
"""Compute retrieval quality metrics for RAG evaluation."""
from typing import List, Set
import numpy as np
def recall_at_k(
retrieved_ids: List[str],
relevant_ids: Set[str],
k: int
) -> float:
"""Compute Recall@K for a single query."""
top_k = set(retrieved_ids[:k])
if not relevant_ids:
return 0.0
return len(top_k & relevant_ids) / len(relevant_ids)
def mrr(
retrieved_ids: List[str],
relevant_ids: Set[str]
) -> float:
"""Compute Mean Reciprocal Rank for a single query."""
for i, doc_id in enumerate(retrieved_ids):
if doc_id in relevant_ids:
return 1.0 / (i + 1)
return 0.0
def ndcg_at_k(
retrieved_ids: List[str],
relevant_ids: Set[str],
k: int
) -> float:
"""Compute NDCG@K for a single query."""
dcg = 0.0
for i, doc_id in enumerate(retrieved_ids[:k]):
if doc_id in relevant_ids:
dcg += 1.0 / np.log2(i + 2)
ideal_dcg = sum(1.0 / np.log2(i + 2) for i in range(min(len(relevant_ids), k)))
return dcg / ideal_dcg if ideal_dcg > 0 else 0.0
def compute_retrieval_metrics(
queries: list,
k_values: list = [1, 3, 5, 10]
) -> dict:
"""Compute aggregate retrieval metrics across all queries."""
results = {}
for k in k_values:
recalls = [
recall_at_k(q["retrieved_ids"], set(q["relevant_ids"]), k)
for q in queries
]
mrrs = [mrr(q["retrieved_ids"], set(q["relevant_ids"])) for q in queries]
ndcgs = [
ndcg_at_k(q["retrieved_ids"], set(q["relevant_ids"]), k)
for q in queries
]
results[f"recall@{k}"] = np.mean(recalls)
results[f"ndcg@{k}"] = np.mean(ndcgs)
results["mrr"] = np.mean(mrrs)
return results
# rag_metrics_exporter.py
"""Export RAG quality metrics to Prometheus."""
from prometheus_client import Histogram, Counter, Gauge, start_http_server
import time
# Latency histograms by stage
RETRIEVAL_LATENCY = Histogram(
"rag_retrieval_duration_seconds",
"Time spent in retrieval stage",
["index_name", "retriever_type"],
buckets=[0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0],
)
GENERATION_LATENCY = Histogram(
"rag_generation_duration_seconds",
"Time spent in generation stage",
["model", "route"],
buckets=[0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0, 30.0],
)
RERANKING_LATENCY = Histogram(
"rag_reranking_duration_seconds",
"Time spent in reranking stage",
["reranker_model"],
buckets=[0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0],
)
# Quality gauges (updated from offline evals)
GROUNDEDNESS_SCORE = Gauge(
"rag_groundedness_score",
"Latest groundedness evaluation score",
["route", "model"],
)
FAITHFULNESS_SCORE = Gauge(
"rag_faithfulness_score",
"Latest faithfulness evaluation score",
["route", "model"],
)
CONTEXT_PRECISION = Gauge(
"rag_context_precision_score",
"Latest context precision score",
["route", "index_name"],
)
RECALL_AT_K = Gauge(
"rag_recall_at_k",
"Recall@K for retrieval",
["k", "index_name"],
)
# Operational counters
REQUESTS_TOTAL = Counter(
"rag_requests_total",
"Total RAG requests",
["route", "status"],
)
HALLUCINATION_DETECTED = Counter(
"rag_hallucination_detected_total",
"Detected hallucinations",
["route", "severity"],
)
FALLBACK_TRIGGERED = Counter(
"rag_fallback_triggered_total",
"Times RAG fell back to abstain/default",
["route", "reason"],
)
TOKENS_USED = Counter(
"rag_tokens_used_total",
"Tokens consumed by stage",
["stage", "model"],
)
CACHE_HITS = Counter(
"rag_cache_hits_total",
"Semantic cache hits",
["cache_type"],
)
# Index health
INDEX_STALENESS_SECONDS = Gauge(
"rag_index_staleness_seconds",
"Seconds since last index update",
["index_name"],
)
INDEX_DOCUMENT_COUNT = Gauge(
"rag_index_document_count",
"Number of documents in index",
["index_name"],
)
def start_metrics_server(port: int = 9090):
"""Start Prometheus metrics HTTP server."""
start_http_server(port)
print(f"RAG metrics server running on :{port}/metrics")
# eval-pipeline-cron.yaml
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: CronJob
metadata:
name: rag-nightly-eval
namespace: ai-evals
spec:
schedule: "0 2 * * *"
jobTemplate:
spec:
template:
spec:
containers:
- name: eval-runner
image: registry.internal/rag-eval:latest
command:
- python
- -m
- rag_eval
- --dataset=/data/benchmark_v3.json
- --output=/results/nightly-$(date +%Y%m%d).json
- --push-metrics
- --fail-on-regression
env:
- name: PROMETHEUS_PUSHGATEWAY
value: "http://pushgateway:9091"
- name: MLFLOW_TRACKING_URI
value: "http://mlflow:5000"
volumeMounts:
- name: eval-data
mountPath: /data
- name: results
mountPath: /results
volumes:
- name: eval-data
persistentVolumeClaim:
claimName: eval-benchmark-data
- name: results
persistentVolumeClaim:
claimName: eval-results
restartPolicy: OnFailure
# rag-alerts.yaml
groups:
- name: rag-quality-alerts
rules:
- alert: GroundednessDropped
expr: rag_groundedness_score < 0.75
for: 10m
labels:
severity: sev2
annotations:
summary: "Groundedness score dropped below 0.75 for {{ $labels.route }}"
- alert: HallucinationSpike
expr: |
rate(rag_hallucination_detected_total[15m])
/ rate(rag_requests_total[15m]) > 0.10
for: 5m
labels:
severity: sev1
- alert: IndexStale
expr: rag_index_staleness_seconds > 86400
for: 5m
labels:
severity: sev3
annotations:
summary: "Index {{ $labels.index_name }} not updated in 24h"
- alert: HighFallbackRate
expr: |
rate(rag_fallback_triggered_total[10m])
/ rate(rag_requests_total[10m]) > 0.20
for: 10m
labels:
severity: sev2
- alert: RetrievalLatencyHigh
expr: |
histogram_quantile(0.95,
rate(rag_retrieval_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])
) > 2.0
for: 5m
labels:
severity: sev2
| Symptom | Check First | Check Second |
|---|---|---|
| Groundedness dropped | Embedding model change? | Chunking/indexing logic change? |
| Retrieval returning irrelevant docs | Index freshness and document count | Embedding model version mismatch |
| Latency spike in retrieval | Vector DB connection pool and load | Index size growth beyond threshold |
| Cost per answer increasing | Token usage per stage breakdown | Cache hit rate decline |
| Hallucination spike | Model version or temperature change | Context window overflow (truncated docs) |
| Issue | Diagnosis | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| RAGAS eval returns 0 for all metrics | Check dataset format matches expected schema | Ensure contexts are lists, not strings |
| Groundedness score unreliable | LLM judge inconsistency | Increase judge sample size, set temperature=0 |
| Index staleness alert firing | Ingestion pipeline failure | Check data source connectivity and ingestion logs |
| Retrieval recall dropping | Embedding drift after model update | Re-index corpus with current embedding model |
| High latency in generation | Context too large for model | Reduce top-k or add summarization step |
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Conduct periodic access reviews and certifications. Implement access governance and recertification workflows. Use when managing access compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instrument AI agents with tracing, token metrics, latency, and cost visibility. Use for reliability and debugging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Secure AI agents against prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration with defense-in-depth controls. Use when building, deploying, or hardening agentic AI systems that invoke tools, access data, or interact with production infrastructure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Secure AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot) with permission boundaries, secret protection, code review gates, and safe sandbox configurations for team environments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use service mesh patterns for AI inference traffic management, mTLS, canary releases, policy enforcement, and cross-cluster resilience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。