本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

codex-verification-discipline

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing; run verification and read the output before any success claim.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md4.8 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml293 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

TL;DR

Evidence before claims. Run the command, read the output, THEN claim the result. No shortcuts. No "should work." No exceptions.

Verification Before Completion

Activation

  1. Activate before ANY claim of completion, success, or passing status.
  2. Activate on explicit $codex-verification-discipline, $verify, or $evidence.
  3. Activate before committing, PR creation, or task sign-off.
  4. Activate when about to move to the next task.
  5. This skill is always-loaded — it runs as a constant behavioral constraint.

Announce at start: "I'm verifying before claiming completion."

The Iron Law

NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE

If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.

Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.

The Gate Function

BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:

1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
   - If NO: State actual status with evidence
   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim

Skip any step = lying, not verifying

Common Violations

ClaimRequiresNot Sufficient
Tests passTest command output: 0 failuresPrevious run, "should pass"
Linter cleanLinter output: 0 errorsPartial check, extrapolation
Build succeedsBuild command: exit 0Linter passing, logs look good
Bug fixedTest original symptom: passesCode changed, assumed fixed
Regression test worksRed-green cycle verifiedTest passes once
Agent completedVCS diff shows changesAgent reports "success"
Requirements metLine-by-line checklistTests passing

Red Flags — STOP

If you catch yourself thinking or writing:

  • Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
  • Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
  • About to commit/push/PR without verification
  • Trusting agent success reports
  • Relying on partial verification
  • Thinking "just this once"
  • ANY wording implying success without having run verification

Rationalization Prevention

ExcuseReality
"Should work now"RUN the verification
"I'm confident"Confidence ≠ evidence
"Just this once"No exceptions
"Linter passed"Linter ≠ compiler ≠ tests
"Agent said success"Verify independently
"Partial check is enough"Partial proves nothing
"Different words so rule doesn't apply"Spirit over letter
"It's trivial"Trivial things break. Run it.

Evidence Patterns

Tests:

✅ [Run test command] → [See: 34/34 pass] → "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"

Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):

✅ Write → Run (FAIL) → Implement → Run (PASS) → "Regression test verified"
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)

Build:

✅ [Run build] → [See: exit 0] → "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter ≠ build)

Requirements:

✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"

Agent delegation:

✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report

When To Apply

ALWAYS before:

  • ANY variation of success/completion claims
  • ANY expression of satisfaction
  • ANY positive statement about work state
  • Committing, PR creation, task completion
  • Moving to next task
  • Delegating to agents

Integration with Other Skills

SkillHow Verification Integrates
codex-test-driven-developmentVerify RED and GREEN steps with actual test output
codex-execution-quality-gateGate scripts provide the evidence; this skill ensures you actually READ the output
codex-systematic-debuggingVerify root cause fix with regression test evidence
codex-subagent-executionVerify subagent output with VCS diff, not agent reports
codex-branch-finisherVerify tests before presenting completion options

Script Invocation Discipline

  1. When this workflow calls helper scripts from other skills, run --help first.
  2. Treat helper scripts as black-box tools and execute by contract before reading source.
  3. Read script source only when customization or bug-fixing is required.

The Bottom Line

No shortcuts for verification.

Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.

This is non-negotiable.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work — guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bang-isme/CodexAI---Skills102026年10月5日 更新

Use when a project has 50+ files, missing context, or explicit $codex-genome request; generates multi-layer project context to reduce hallucination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bang-isme/CodexAI---Skills102026年10月5日 更新

Use for DESIGN.md visual identity contracts; author, scaffold, lint, diff, and export design contracts with the upstream spec and CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bang-isme/CodexAI---Skills102026年10月5日 更新

Use when the task involves reading, creating, or editing `.docx` documents, especially when formatting or layout fidelity matters; prefer `python-docx` plus the bundled `scripts/render_docx.py` for visual checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bang-isme/CodexAI---Skills102026年10月5日 更新

Use when code changes may require documentation updates; maps git diff to candidate docs without auto-editing documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bang-isme/CodexAI---Skills102026年10月5日 更新

Use for documents, reports, memos, guides, academic papers, or formal text that needs clear structure, reliable tone, formatting, and diagrams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bang-isme/CodexAI---Skills102026年10月5日 更新

Bang-isme のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する