本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

agent-task-mapping

Map tasks to specialist agents. Use when choosing which agent for a job, comparing agent capabilities, or routing to React/Next.js/Playwright/docs/code-quality experts. Keywords: which agent, best agent for this, delegate to expert, agent capability mapping.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md6.1 KB
  • CHANGELOG.md4.4 KB
  • LICENSE.txt1.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Agent Task Mapping

  • Leverage native parallel subagent dispatch and 200k+ context windows where available.

Activation Conditions

Use symptom -> action triggers: when one matches, apply this skill and verify with the protocol below.

Use this skill when:

  • Determining which specialized agent to delegate a task to
  • Reviewing agent capabilities and expertise areas
  • Trying to match a specific task to an appropriate specialist
  • Needing quick reference for available agents and their purposes

Available Agents

See Agent Details for comprehensive information about each agent:

  • Description and specialization areas
  • When to use each agent
  • Typical tasks handled by each

Anti-Patterns

  • Delegating or evaluating without a scoped success condition: The output becomes hard to review and easy to overbuild.
  • Skipping the evidence step: A workflow that cannot be re-checked quickly is not ready for handoff.
  • Bundling unrelated subtasks together: It creates noisy prompts, weaker ownership, and avoidable integration risk.

Verification Protocol

Before claiming "skill applied successfully":

  1. Pass/fail: The Agent Task Mapping workflow names the agent boundary, delegated scope, and expected return artifact.
  2. Pass/fail: Context passed to helpers is minimal, task-local, and free of hidden expected answers.
  3. Pass/fail: Results are integrated only after evidence, diffs, or citations are checked by the controller.
  4. Pressure-test scenario: Run the workflow on two similar tasks that must not share assumptions or leaked context.
  5. Success metric: Zero context leakage; every delegated output is independently reviewable.

Examples & Scripts

Quick Reference

Agent NameBest For
Code ExplainerAnalyzing and documenting existing code
UI DesignerUI/UX improvements and design implementations
Universal JanitorCode cleanup, simplification, and tech debt removal
Critical ThinkingChallenging assumptions and exploring alternatives
Next.js ExpertNext.js 15/16+ architecture and optimizations
Expert React Frontend EngineerReact 19+ patterns and best practices
Playwright Tester ModeComprehensive testing with exploratory testing
Tech WriterCreating formal developer documentation
Create PRD Chat ModeGenerating Product Requirements Documents
SpecificationGenerating or updating specification documents
PlanResearch and outlining multi-step plans

Decision Framework

When choosing an agent for delegation:

  1. Identify task type: Is it documentation, testing, two-stage review (spec compliance first, then code quality), or development?
  2. Match to specialization: Find agent whose description aligns with task
  3. Check availability: Verify agent exists and has proper frontmatter configuration
  4. Use specific agentName: Delegate using exact name from agent's frontmatter

Task Categories

Code Analysis & Documentation

  • Use Code Explainer for analyzing existing code patterns
  • Use Tech Writer for formal developer documentation
  • Use Specification for generating feature specifications

Code Quality & Maintenance

  • Use Universal Janitor for cleanup and tech debt remediation
  • Use Critical Thinking for challenging assumptions

Development Work

  • Use Next.js Expert for Next.js 15/16+ architecture and optimizations
  • Use Expert React Frontend Engineer for React 19+ patterns

Testing

  • Use Playwright Tester Mode for comprehensive web application testing

Planning & Requirements

  • Use Plan for research and outlining multi-step plans
  • Use Create PRD Chat Mode for generating Product Requirements Documents

Design

  • Use UI Designer for UI/UX improvements and design implementations

<!-- MCP:START --> <!-- PORTABILITY:START -->

Cross-Client Portability

This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.

  • GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill path or wrap the workflow in project instructions when folder discovery is unavailable.
  • Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin source.
  • Codex: install or sync the folder into $CODEX_HOME/skills/agent-task-mapping and restart Codex after major changes.
<!-- PORTABILITY:END -->

MCP Availability And Fallback

Preferred MCP Server: None required

  • Fallback prompt: "Use the Agent Task Mapping skill without MCP. Rely on the local SKILL.md, bundled references or scripts, and manual verification. Show the exact commands, evidence, and final checks you used before concluding."
  • If the current host does not expose a matching server, use the bundled references, scripts, native toolchain, and manual workflow already described in this skill.
  • Treat direct local verification, rendered output, logs, tests, or screenshots as the fallback evidence path before completion.
<!-- MCP:END -->

Related Skills

  • custom-agent-usage: Use it when the workflow also needs loading and invoking custom agent definitions safely.
  • subagent-delegation: Use it when the workflow also needs safe, scoped delegation to helper agents.
  • subagent-driven-development: Use it when the workflow also needs plan-driven implementation with reviewer loops.
  • agentic-eval: Use it when the workflow also needs rubric-driven evaluation loops.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

bg-szy のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する