AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
REST API design patterns including resource naming, status codes, pagination, filtering, error responses, versioning, and rate limiting for production APIs.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Conventions and best practices for designing consistent, developer-friendly REST APIs.
# Resources are nouns, plural, lowercase, kebab-case
GET /api/v1/users
GET /api/v1/users/:id
POST /api/v1/users
PUT /api/v1/users/:id
PATCH /api/v1/users/:id
DELETE /api/v1/users/:id
# Sub-resources for relationships
GET /api/v1/users/:id/orders
POST /api/v1/users/:id/orders
# Actions that don't map to CRUD (use verbs sparingly)
POST /api/v1/orders/:id/cancel
POST /api/v1/auth/login
POST /api/v1/auth/refresh
# GOOD
/api/v1/team-members # kebab-case for multi-word resources
/api/v1/orders?status=active # query params for filtering
/api/v1/users/123/orders # nested resources for ownership
# BAD
/api/v1/getUsers # verb in URL
/api/v1/user # singular (use plural)
/api/v1/team_members # snake_case in URLs
/api/v1/users/123/getOrders # verb in nested resource
| Method | Idempotent | Safe | Use For |
|---|---|---|---|
| GET | Yes | Yes | Retrieve resources |
| POST | No | No | Create resources, trigger actions |
| PUT | Yes | No | Full replacement of a resource |
| PATCH | No* | No | Partial update of a resource |
| DELETE | Yes | No | Remove a resource |
*PATCH can be made idempotent with proper implementation
# Success
200 OK — GET, PUT, PATCH (with response body)
201 Created — POST (include Location header)
204 No Content — DELETE, PUT (no response body)
# Client Errors
400 Bad Request — Validation failure, malformed JSON
401 Unauthorized — Missing or invalid authentication
403 Forbidden — Authenticated but not authorized
404 Not Found — Resource doesn't exist
409 Conflict — Duplicate entry, state conflict
422 Unprocessable Entity — Semantically invalid (valid JSON, bad data)
429 Too Many Requests — Rate limit exceeded
# Server Errors
500 Internal Server Error — Unexpected failure (never expose details)
502 Bad Gateway — Upstream service failed
503 Service Unavailable — Temporary overload, include Retry-After
# BAD: 200 for everything
{ "status": 200, "success": false, "error": "Not found" }
# GOOD: Use HTTP status codes semantically
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
{ "error": { "code": "not_found", "message": "User not found" } }
# BAD: 500 for validation errors
# GOOD: 400 or 422 with field-level details
# BAD: 200 for created resources
# GOOD: 201 with Location header
HTTP/1.1 201 Created
Location: /api/v1/users/abc-123
{
"data": {
"id": "abc-123",
"email": "alice@example.com",
"name": "Alice",
"created_at": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z"
}
}
{
"data": [
{ "id": "abc-123", "name": "Alice" },
{ "id": "def-456", "name": "Bob" }
],
"meta": {
"total": 142,
"page": 1,
"per_page": 20,
"total_pages": 8
},
"links": {
"self": "/api/v1/users?page=1&per_page=20",
"next": "/api/v1/users?page=2&per_page=20",
"last": "/api/v1/users?page=8&per_page=20"
}
}
{
"error": {
"code": "validation_error",
"message": "Request validation failed",
"details": [
{
"field": "email",
"message": "Must be a valid email address",
"code": "invalid_format"
},
{
"field": "age",
"message": "Must be between 0 and 150",
"code": "out_of_range"
}
]
}
}
// Option A: Envelope with data wrapper (recommended for public APIs)
interface ApiResponse<T> {
data: T;
meta?: PaginationMeta;
links?: PaginationLinks;
}
interface ApiError {
error: {
code: string;
message: string;
details?: FieldError[];
};
}
// Option B: Flat response (simpler, common for internal APIs)
// Success: just return the resource directly
// Error: return error object
// Distinguish by HTTP status code
GET /api/v1/users?page=2&per_page=20
# Implementation
SELECT * FROM users
ORDER BY created_at DESC
LIMIT 20 OFFSET 20;
Pros: Easy to implement, supports "jump to page N" Cons: Slow on large offsets (OFFSET 100000), inconsistent with concurrent inserts
GET /api/v1/users?cursor=eyJpZCI6MTIzfQ&limit=20
# Implementation
SELECT * FROM users
WHERE id > :cursor_id
ORDER BY id ASC
LIMIT 21; -- fetch one extra to determine has_next
{
"data": [...],
"meta": {
"has_next": true,
"next_cursor": "eyJpZCI6MTQzfQ"
}
}
Pros: Consistent performance regardless of position, stable with concurrent inserts Cons: Cannot jump to arbitrary page, cursor is opaque
| Use Case | Pagination Type |
|---|---|
| Admin dashboards, small datasets (<10K) | Offset |
| Infinite scroll, feeds, large datasets | Cursor |
| Public APIs | Cursor (default) with offset (optional) |
| Search results | Offset (users expect page numbers) |
# Simple equality
GET /api/v1/orders?status=active&customer_id=abc-123
# Comparison operators (use bracket notation)
GET /api/v1/products?price[gte]=10&price[lte]=100
GET /api/v1/orders?created_at[after]=2025-01-01
# Multiple values (comma-separated)
GET /api/v1/products?category=electronics,clothing
# Nested fields (dot notation)
GET /api/v1/orders?customer.country=US
# Single field (prefix - for descending)
GET /api/v1/products?sort=-created_at
# Multiple fields (comma-separated)
GET /api/v1/products?sort=-featured,price,-created_at
# Search query parameter
GET /api/v1/products?q=wireless+headphones
# Field-specific search
GET /api/v1/users?email=alice
# Return only specified fields (reduces payload)
GET /api/v1/users?fields=id,name,email
GET /api/v1/orders?fields=id,total,status&include=customer.name
# Bearer token in Authorization header
GET /api/v1/users
Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIs...
# API key (for server-to-server)
GET /api/v1/data
X-API-Key: sk_live_abc123
// Resource-level: check ownership
app.get("/api/v1/orders/:id", async (req, res) => {
const order = await Order.findById(req.params.id);
if (!order) return res.status(404).json({ error: { code: "not_found" } });
if (order.userId !== req.user.id) return res.status(403).json({ error: { code: "forbidden" } });
return res.json({ data: order });
});
// Role-based: check permissions
app.delete("/api/v1/users/:id", requireRole("admin"), async (req, res) => {
await User.delete(req.params.id);
return res.status(204).send();
});
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
X-RateLimit-Limit: 100
X-RateLimit-Remaining: 95
X-RateLimit-Reset: 1640000000
# When exceeded
HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Retry-After: 60
{
"error": {
"code": "rate_limit_exceeded",
"message": "Rate limit exceeded. Try again in 60 seconds."
}
}
| Tier | Limit | Window | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anonymous | 30/min | Per IP | Public endpoints |
| Authenticated | 100/min | Per user | Standard API access |
| Premium | 1000/min | Per API key | Paid API plans |
| Internal | 10000/min | Per service | Service-to-service |
/api/v1/users
/api/v2/users
Pros: Explicit, easy to route, cacheable Cons: URL changes between versions
GET /api/users
Accept: application/vnd.myapp.v2+json
Pros: Clean URLs Cons: Harder to test, easy to forget
1. Start with /api/v1/ — don't version until you need to
2. Maintain at most 2 active versions (current + previous)
3. Deprecation timeline:
- Announce deprecation (6 months notice for public APIs)
- Add Sunset header: Sunset: Sat, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT
- Return 410 Gone after sunset date
4. Non-breaking changes don't need a new version:
- Adding new fields to responses
- Adding new optional query parameters
- Adding new endpoints
5. Breaking changes require a new version:
- Removing or renaming fields
- Changing field types
- Changing URL structure
- Changing authentication method
import { z } from "zod";
import { NextRequest, NextResponse } from "next/server";
const createUserSchema = z.object({
email: z.string().email(),
name: z.string().min(1).max(100),
});
export async function POST(req: NextRequest) {
const body = await req.json();
const parsed = createUserSchema.safeParse(body);
if (!parsed.success) {
return NextResponse.json({
error: {
code: "validation_error",
message: "Request validation failed",
details: parsed.error.issues.map(i => ({
field: i.path.join("."),
message: i.message,
code: i.code,
})),
},
}, { status: 422 });
}
const user = await createUser(parsed.data);
return NextResponse.json(
{ data: user },
{
status: 201,
headers: { Location: `/api/v1/users/${user.id}` },
},
);
}
from rest_framework import serializers, viewsets, status
from rest_framework.response import Response
class CreateUserSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
email = serializers.EmailField()
name = serializers.CharField(max_length=100)
class UserSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = User
fields = ["id", "email", "name", "created_at"]
class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
serializer_class = UserSerializer
permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated]
def get_serializer_class(self):
if self.action == "create":
return CreateUserSerializer
return UserSerializer
def create(self, request):
serializer = CreateUserSerializer(data=request.data)
serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True)
user = UserService.create(**serializer.validated_data)
return Response(
{"data": UserSerializer(user).data},
status=status.HTTP_201_CREATED,
headers={"Location": f"/api/v1/users/{user.id}"},
)
func (h *UserHandler) CreateUser(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
var req CreateUserRequest
if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&req); err != nil {
writeError(w, http.StatusBadRequest, "invalid_json", "Invalid request body")
return
}
if err := req.Validate(); err != nil {
writeError(w, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity, "validation_error", err.Error())
return
}
user, err := h.service.Create(r.Context(), req)
if err != nil {
switch {
case errors.Is(err, domain.ErrEmailTaken):
writeError(w, http.StatusConflict, "email_taken", "Email already registered")
default:
writeError(w, http.StatusInternalServerError, "internal_error", "Internal error")
}
return
}
w.Header().Set("Location", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/users/%s", user.ID))
writeJSON(w, http.StatusCreated, map[string]any{"data": user})
}
Before shipping a new endpoint:
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。