AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master Python asyncio, concurrent programming, and async/await patterns for high-performance applications. Use when building async APIs, concurrent systems, or I/O-bound applications requiring non-blocking operations.
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Comprehensive guidance for implementing asynchronous Python applications using asyncio, concurrent programming patterns, and async/await for building high-performance, non-blocking systems.
Before adopting async, consider whether it's the right choice for your use case.
| Use Case | Recommended Approach |
|---|---|
| Many concurrent network/DB calls | asyncio |
| CPU-bound computation | multiprocessing or thread pool |
| Mixed I/O + CPU | Offload CPU work with asyncio.to_thread() |
| Simple scripts, few connections | Sync (simpler, easier to debug) |
| Web APIs with high concurrency | Async frameworks (FastAPI, aiohttp) |
Key Rule: Stay fully sync or fully async within a call path. Mixing creates hidden blocking and complexity.
The event loop is the heart of asyncio, managing and scheduling asynchronous tasks.
Key characteristics:
Functions defined with async def that can be paused and resumed.
Syntax:
async def my_coroutine():
result = await some_async_operation()
return result
Scheduled coroutines that run concurrently on the event loop.
Low-level objects representing eventual results of async operations.
Resources that support async with for proper cleanup.
Objects that support async for for iterating over async data sources.
import asyncio
async def main():
print("Hello")
await asyncio.sleep(1)
print("World")
# Python 3.7+
asyncio.run(main())
import asyncio
async def fetch_data(url: str) -> dict:
"""Fetch data from URL asynchronously."""
await asyncio.sleep(1) # Simulate I/O
return {"url": url, "data": "result"}
async def main():
result = await fetch_data("https://api.example.com")
print(result)
asyncio.run(main())
import asyncio
from typing import List
async def fetch_user(user_id: int) -> dict:
"""Fetch user data."""
await asyncio.sleep(0.5)
return {"id": user_id, "name": f"User {user_id}"}
async def fetch_all_users(user_ids: List[int]) -> List[dict]:
"""Fetch multiple users concurrently."""
tasks = [fetch_user(uid) for uid in user_ids]
results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
return results
async def main():
user_ids = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
users = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)
print(f"Fetched {len(users)} users")
asyncio.run(main())
import asyncio
async def background_task(name: str, delay: int):
"""Long-running background task."""
print(f"{name} started")
await asyncio.sleep(delay)
print(f"{name} completed")
return f"Result from {name}"
async def main():
# Create tasks
task1 = asyncio.create_task(background_task("Task 1", 2))
task2 = asyncio.create_task(background_task("Task 2", 1))
# Do other work
print("Main: doing other work")
await asyncio.sleep(0.5)
# Wait for tasks
result1 = await task1
result2 = await task2
print(f"Results: {result1}, {result2}")
asyncio.run(main())
import asyncio
from typing import List, Optional
async def risky_operation(item_id: int) -> dict:
"""Operation that might fail."""
await asyncio.sleep(0.1)
if item_id % 3 == 0:
raise ValueError(f"Item {item_id} failed")
return {"id": item_id, "status": "success"}
async def safe_operation(item_id: int) -> Optional[dict]:
"""Wrapper with error handling."""
try:
return await risky_operation(item_id)
except ValueError as e:
print(f"Error: {e}")
return None
async def process_items(item_ids: List[int]):
"""Process multiple items with error handling."""
tasks = [safe_operation(iid) for iid in item_ids]
results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks, return_exceptions=True)
# Filter out failures
successful = [r for r in results if r is not None and not isinstance(r, Exception)]
failed = [r for r in results if isinstance(r, Exception)]
print(f"Success: {len(successful)}, Failed: {len(failed)}")
return successful
asyncio.run(process_items([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]))
import asyncio
async def slow_operation(delay: int) -> str:
"""Operation that takes time."""
await asyncio.sleep(delay)
return f"Completed after {delay}s"
async def with_timeout():
"""Execute operation with timeout."""
try:
result = await asyncio.wait_for(slow_operation(5), timeout=2.0)
print(result)
except asyncio.TimeoutError:
print("Operation timed out")
asyncio.run(with_timeout())
Detailed sections (starting with ## Advanced Patterns) live in references/details.md. Read that file when the navigation summary above is insufficient.
# Wrong - returns coroutine object, doesn't execute
result = async_function()
# Correct
result = await async_function()
# Wrong - blocks event loop
import time
async def bad():
time.sleep(1) # Blocks!
# Correct
async def good():
await asyncio.sleep(1) # Non-blocking
async def cancelable_task():
"""Task that handles cancellation."""
try:
while True:
await asyncio.sleep(1)
print("Working...")
except asyncio.CancelledError:
print("Task cancelled, cleaning up...")
# Perform cleanup
raise # Re-raise to propagate cancellation
# Wrong - can't call async from sync directly
def sync_function():
result = await async_function() # SyntaxError!
# Correct
def sync_function():
result = asyncio.run(async_function())
import asyncio
import pytest
# Using pytest-asyncio
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_async_function():
"""Test async function."""
result = await fetch_data("https://api.example.com")
assert result is not None
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_with_timeout():
"""Test with timeout."""
with pytest.raises(asyncio.TimeoutError):
await asyncio.wait_for(slow_operation(5), timeout=1.0)
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。