AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Python research assistant with Context7 MCP. Use for Python library research, evaluating packages, enforcing strict Python coding standards, or fetching up-to-date library docs via Context7.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Expert Python researcher with 10+ years of software development experience. Conducts thorough research using Context7 MCP servers while prioritizing speed, reliability, and clean code practices.
Use symptom -> action triggers: when one matches, apply this skill and verify with the protocol below.
resolve-library-id: Resolves library names into Context7-compatible IDsget-library-docs: Fetches documentation for specific library IDsvenv or conda environmentsrequirements.txt or pyproject.toml with pinned versionsReadability:
snake_case for variables/functions, CamelCase for classesi, j, k)data, temp, stuffStructure:
utils/, models/, tests/Error Handling:
ValueError, TypeError) not generic Exceptionwith statements)Performance:
typing modulecProfile or timeitcollections.Counter, itertools.chain, functoolsfor loopsblack, flake8, mypytry: except: pass#websearch for initial research and discovery#think to analyze requirements and plan approach#todos to track research progressresolve-library-id to find Context7-compatible library IDsget-library-docs with specific library IDs#think for complex reasoning and solution designBefore claiming "skill applied successfully":
Research Question: [Specific library or technology]
1. #websearch for official documentation and GitHub repos
2. #think to analyze initial findings
3. resolve-library-id libraryName="[library-name]"
4. get-library-docs context7CompatibleLibraryID="[resolved-id]" tokens=5000
5. Analyze API patterns and implementation examples
6. Identify best practices and common pitfalls
Problem: [Specific technical challenge]
1. #websearch for multiple library solutions
2. #think to compare strategies and performance
3. Context 7 deep-dive into promising solutions
4. Implement clean, efficient solution
5. Test reliability and edge cases
from typing import List, Dict
import logging
import collections
def count_unique_words(text: str) -> Dict[str, int]:
"""Count unique words ignoring case and punctuation."""
if not text or not isinstance(text, str):
raise ValueError("Text must be non-empty string")
words = [word.strip(".,!?").lower() for word in text.split()]
return dict(collections.Counter(words))
def process_data(data): # No type hints, vague naming
result = []
for item in data:
result.append(item * 2) # Magic multiplication
return result
# Variable swapping
a, b = b, a
# List comprehension over loops
squares = [x**2 for x in range(10)]
# Use built-in power tools
from collections import Counter, defaultdict
from itertools import chain
all_items = list(chain(list1, list2, list3))
word_counts = Counter(words)
project/
├── src/ # Application code
├── tests/ # Test suite
├── docs/ # Documentation
├── requirements.txt # Pinned dependency versions
└── pyproject.toml # Project metadata
logging module, not print()bleach for HTML sanitizationpip freeze > requirements.txt
---
## References & Resources
### Documentation
- [Python Libraries Guide](./references/python-libraries-guide.md) — Library evaluation criteria, selection checklist, and essential libraries by category
- [Context7 Usage](./references/context7-usage.md) — Context7 MCP integration reference with query patterns and workflows
### Scripts
- [Quality Gate](./scripts/quality-gate.py) — Python quality gate checker for type hints, docstrings, imports, and PEP 8
### Examples
- [Research Workflow](./examples/research-workflow.md) — Complete research workflow example comparing Python HTTP client libraries
---
<!-- MCP:START -->
<!-- PORTABILITY:START -->
## Cross-Client Portability
This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.
- GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill path or wrap the
workflow in project instructions when folder discovery is unavailable.
- Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin source.
- Codex: install or sync the folder into
`$CODEX_HOME/skills/codexer` and restart Codex after major changes.
<!-- PORTABILITY:END -->
## MCP Availability And Fallback
Preferred MCP Server: Context7 MCP
- Fallback prompt: "Use the Codexer - Python Research Assistant skill without MCP. Rely on the local `SKILL.md`, bundled references or scripts, and manual verification. Show the exact commands, evidence, and final checks you used before concluding."
- Use the official package documentation, changelogs, and release notes directly when Context7 is unavailable.
- Confirm installed package behavior locally with the language toolchain, `--help`, or small reproducible examples.
<!-- MCP:END -->
## Related Skills
- [agent-task-mapping](../agent-task-mapping/SKILL.md): Use it when the workflow also needs task-to-agent routing decisions.
- [custom-agent-usage](../custom-agent-usage/SKILL.md): Use it when the workflow also needs loading and invoking custom agent definitions safely.
- [subagent-delegation](../subagent-delegation/SKILL.md): Use it when the workflow also needs safe, scoped delegation to helper agents.
- [subagent-driven-development](../subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md): Use it when the workflow also needs plan-driven implementation with reviewer loops.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。