本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

microsoft-development

Microsoft docs lookup, code samples, and SDK reference for Azure, .NET, Microsoft 365, Windows, and Power Platform via Microsoft Learn MCP. Use for API reference or official MS documentation retrieval.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB
  • CHANGELOG.md4.6 KB
  • LICENSE.txt1.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Microsoft Development

Optimized for current Microsoft Graph, Entra ID, PowerShell 7.x, and Microsoft 365 integration workflows.

Use this skill when the answer should come from Microsoft documentation rather than memory or third-party summaries.

  • Leverage native parallel subagent dispatch and 200k+ context windows where available.

Current MCP Reality

Microsoft's Learn Docs MCP server is publicly documented and currently exposes these core tools:

  • microsoft_docs_search
  • microsoft_docs_fetch
  • microsoft_docs_extract_code_examples
  • microsoft_docs_search_by_product

Microsoft's getting-started docs also describe installation through npx -y @microsoft/learn-docs-mcp.

Activation Conditions

Use symptom -> action triggers: when one matches, apply this skill and verify with the protocol below.

  • Verifying Azure SDK usage, limits, or configuration
  • Looking up .NET, Graph, Windows, or Microsoft 365 APIs
  • Pulling official code examples before implementation
  • Checking product-specific guidance for Azure, Power BI, or Power Platform

Recommended Workflow

  1. Search first with microsoft_docs_search.
  2. Narrow by product with microsoft_docs_search_by_product when results are broad.
  3. Fetch the relevant page with microsoft_docs_fetch for details.
  4. Extract code examples with microsoft_docs_extract_code_examples if the user needs working snippets.
  5. Prefer official code and limits over recollection.

Query Patterns

  • "Azure Container Apps scale rules"
  • "BlobClient UploadAsync Azure.Storage.Blobs"
  • product="power-bi" query="row level security dax"
  • product="microsoft-graph" query="send mail application permissions"

Guardrails

  • Use Microsoft Learn MCP for Microsoft-specific answers before browsing elsewhere.
  • Treat package versions, quotas, and service capabilities as time-sensitive.
  • If Learn MCP is unavailable in the current client, use the included scripts and references as local fallbacks, then browse official docs.

Anti-Patterns

  • Changing infrastructure before inspecting the current state: Cloud drift and hidden dependencies make blind edits risky.
  • Hardcoding credentials or environment assumptions: Rollouts stop being reproducible and secrets become harder to rotate.
  • Skipping rollback, observability, or validation planning: You only notice the missing safeguards after the deployment is already live.

Verification Protocol

Before claiming "skill applied successfully":

  1. Pass/fail: The Microsoft Development implementation names the target runtime, framework version, and affected files.
  2. Pass/fail: Build, lint, test, or equivalent local validation is run for the changed surface.
  3. Pass/fail: Edge cases for errors, dependency drift, and environment differences are addressed or explicitly out of scope.
  4. Pressure-test scenario: Apply the workflow to a change that passes happy-path tests but fails one boundary condition.
  5. Success metric: Zero untested success claims; every implementation claim maps to a command or artifact.

Before and After Example

# Before
az deployment group create `
  --resource-group app-rg `
  --template-file main.bicep

# After
$deploymentName = "api-$(Get-Date -Format yyyyMMddHHmmss)"
az deployment group create `
  --name $deploymentName `
  --resource-group app-rg `
  --template-file main.bicep `
  --parameters environment=prod `
  --what-if

Moves from an opaque deployment command to a traceable and reviewable workflow with named deployments, explicit parameters, and a preflight diff.

Common Pitfalls

  • Treating vendor examples as drop-in production code: Official snippets usually prove an API, not your project’s retry, logging, or auth requirements.
  • Skipping service-specific limits and permissions review: Azure and Microsoft 365 failures often come from quotas or scopes rather than syntax.
  • Relying on memory instead of current docs: Microsoft SDK behavior and surface area change often enough that stale recall is risky.

References & Resources

Documentation

Scripts

  • Azure Health Check - Validate Azure login and inspect common resource health in a resource group

Examples

<!-- MCP:START --> <!-- PORTABILITY:START -->

Cross-Client Portability

This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.

  • GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill path or wrap the workflow in project instructions when folder discovery is unavailable.
  • Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin source.
  • Codex: install or sync the folder into $CODEX_HOME/skills/microsoft-development and restart Codex after major changes.
<!-- PORTABILITY:END -->

MCP Availability And Fallback

Preferred MCP Server: Microsoft Learn Docs MCP

  • Fallback prompt: "Use the Microsoft Development skill without MCP. Rely on the local SKILL.md, bundled references or scripts, and manual verification. Show the exact commands, evidence, and final checks you used before concluding."
  • Use Microsoft Learn in a browser and local SDK or CLI documentation when the docs MCP server is unavailable.
  • Verify generated commands or samples with the native toolchain (dotnet, az, PowerShell, etc.) before shipping them.
<!-- MCP:END -->

Related Skills

  • azure-integrations: Use it when the workflow also needs Azure deployment and infrastructure automation.
  • powerbi-modeling: Use it when the workflow also needs Power BI semantic model design and DAX work.
  • sql-development: Use it when the workflow also needs SQL query, schema, and performance tuning work.
  • documentation-authoring: Use it when the workflow also needs drafting structured technical or product documents.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

bg-szy のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する