本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

stitch-react-native

Convert Stitch HTML designs into React Native screens, or sync existing native components to updated Stitch designs, using native primitives, StyleSheet rules, and mobile platform checks.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md5.7 KB
  • CHANGELOG.md4.1 KB
  • LICENSE.txt11.0 KB
  • package-lock.json8.4 KB
  • package.json370 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Stitch React Native

This skill is a catalog-normalized import from https://github.com/google-labs-code/stitch-skills at commit 7b53207b94e62911777d53d4238b5f8c88c2b519, source path plugins/stitch-build/skills/react-native. The upstream control file was corrected for this workspace: the verified Stitch MCP surface here is design-system oriented, so screen lookup, screen generation, and screen editing tools must be used only when the current host explicitly exposes them.

When to Use This Skill

  • Use when Stitch web designs should become React Native screens or existing native components must be synchronized with newer Stitch evidence.
  • The task involves Google Stitch project IDs, .stitch/ artifacts, DESIGN.md files, Stitch exports, or Stitch-specific validation.
  • The broader stitch-design router points here as the narrowest workflow.

Workflow

  1. Start from exported Stitch HTML and a screenshot, using host-listed screen tools only when present.
  2. Extract current theme values into src/theme.ts and record available project/screen identifiers plus the sync timestamp in .stitch/metadata.json.
  3. Map web elements to React Native primitives and wrap visible text in Text.
  4. Translate CSS into StyleSheet.create() with shared theme values rather than raw color literals.
  5. Replace hover, fixed positioning, browser-only CSS, and DOM events with native patterns.
  6. Use react-native-safe-area-context, accessibility labels and roles, useWindowDimensions, Platform.select, FlatList, and SectionList where appropriate.
  7. Validate syntax with the bundled validator when dependencies are installed.

Local Assets

  • examples/, resources/, references/, or reference/ are upstream support material when present. Treat SKILL.md as the source of truth if a support file mentions an unavailable MCP tool.
  • scripts/ are optional helpers. On Windows, prefer PowerShell or Node equivalents unless Git Bash or WSL is actually available.
  • Keep generated .stitch/ files out of commits unless the user explicitly wants them as durable examples.

Corrected Stitch MCP Surface

Verified in this workspace on 2026-06-15: create_project, upload_design_md, create_design_system_from_design_md, list_design_systems, and apply_design_system. This 2026-07-29 source refresh did not re-verify a broader live MCP surface. Do not claim list_projects, list_screens, get_project, get_screen, generate_screen_from_text, edit_screens, or generate_variants were used unless the current host exposes those exact tools in the active tool list.

Anti-Patterns

  • Claiming a Stitch screen-generation, screen-editing, or screen-retrieval MCP call succeeded when the active host does not expose that tool.
  • Uploading files, screenshots, HTML, markdown, or design assets to Stitch without user-approved destination and artifact details.
  • Reading, printing, storing, or committing Stitch API keys, MCP config secrets, cookies, or credential-bearing files.
  • Treating generated design or code as final without local render, syntax, or artifact verification.
  • Collapsing this workflow into a broader frontend/design skill when Stitch-specific files, project IDs, or design-system assets matter.

Verification Protocol

Before claiming this skill was applied successfully:

  1. Pass/fail: No DOM tags or web event names remain.
  2. Pass/fail: Text, images, lists, and press interactions use native primitives.
  3. Pass/fail: iOS and Android shadow/safe-area differences are handled or scoped out.
  4. Pass/fail: The result was checked with local React Native tooling or blocker evidence.
  5. Pressure-test scenario: Repeat the workflow with Stitch MCP screen tools unavailable and confirm the fallback path remains honest and actionable.
  6. Success metric: The user can identify the exact artifact, project/design-system target, and verification evidence without relying on unstated MCP behavior.
<!-- MCP:START --> <!-- PORTABILITY:START -->

Cross-Client Portability

This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.

  • GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill path or wrap the workflow in project instructions when folder discovery is unavailable.
  • Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin source.
  • Codex: install or sync the folder into $CODEX_HOME/skills/stitch-react-native and restart Codex after major changes.
<!-- PORTABILITY:END -->

MCP Availability And Fallback

Preferred MCP Server: Stitch MCP

  • Fallback prompt: "Use the Stitch React Native skill without Stitch MCP. Use local HTML/screenshots and manual native mapping when Stitch MCP screen retrieval is unavailable. Show the exact files, commands, manual Stitch UI steps, and verification evidence used before concluding."
  • Verified Stitch MCP tools in this workspace are design-system/project oriented; use broader screen tools only when the current host exposes them.
  • Use local scripts, exported HTML/screenshots, the Stitch web UI, and project metadata files as the fallback evidence path.
<!-- MCP:END -->

Related Skills

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

bg-szy のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する