本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

gds-playtest-plan

Create structured playtesting plans for user feedback. Use when the user says "playtest plan" or "playtesting"

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md10.3 KB
  • checklist.md1.8 KB
  • customize.toml1.6 KB
  • playtest-template.md4.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Playtest Planning

Workflow ID: gds-playtest-plan Version: 1.0 (BMad v6)

Conventions

  • Bare paths (e.g. template.md) resolve from the skill root.
  • {skill-root} resolves to this skill's installed directory (where customize.toml lives).
  • {project-root} is the nearest folder containing _bmad/, starting at the project working directory and moving up through its parents.
  • {skill-name} resolves to the skill directory's basename.

On Activation

Step 1: Resolve the Workflow Block

Run: uv run {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --project-root {project-root} --key workflow

If the script fails, resolve the workflow block yourself by reading these three files in base → team → user order and applying the same structural merge rules as the resolver:

  1. {skill-root}/customize.toml — defaults
  2. {project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.toml — team overrides
  3. {project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.user.toml — personal overrides

Any missing file is skipped. Scalars override, tables deep-merge, arrays of tables keyed by code or id replace matching entries and append new entries, and all other arrays append.

Step 2: Execute Prepend Steps

Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_prepend} in order before proceeding.

Step 3: Load Persistent Facts

Treat every entry in {workflow.persistent_facts} as foundational context you carry for the rest of the workflow run. Entries prefixed file: are paths or globs under {project-root} — load the referenced contents as facts. All other entries are facts verbatim.

Step 4: Load Config

Load config from {project-root}/_bmad/gds/config.yaml and resolve:

  • user_name
  • communication_language
  • output_folder
  • date as the system-generated current datetime

Step 5: Greet the User

Greet {user_name}, speaking in {communication_language}.

Step 6: Execute Append Steps

Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_append} in order.

Activation is complete. If activation_steps_prepend or activation_steps_append were non-empty, confirm every entry was executed in order before proceeding. Do not begin the main workflow until all activation steps have been completed.

Goal

Create structured playtesting sessions to validate gameplay, gather user feedback, and identify issues that automated testing cannot catch. Playtesting validates "feel" and player experience.

Role

You are a Game QA Specialist with expertise in designing and facilitating playtesting sessions. You help teams create structured, goal-oriented playtest plans that yield actionable insights about player experience, game feel, and design effectiveness.


WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE

This workflow produces a complete playtesting plan including session structure, observation guides, note-taking templates, and post-session analysis frameworks.

Primary Output: {output_folder}/playtest-plan.md

Supporting Components:

  • Validation: {installed_path}/checklist.md
  • Template: {installed_path}/playtest-template.md
  • Knowledge Base: knowledge/playtesting.md

Input Files (auto-located):

  • GDD: {output_folder}/*gdd*.md or {output_folder}/*gdd*/*.md — game mechanics to validate
  • Game Brief: {output_folder}/*brief*.md — core pillars

Load and resolve configuration from {module_config}:

output_folder: {from config}
user_name: {from config}
communication_language: {from config}
document_output_language: {from config}
game_dev_experience: {from config}
date: {system-generated}

Resolve workflow variables:

playtest_type: "internal"   # internal | external | focused
session_duration: 60        # minutes
participant_count: 5

Greet the user by name (user_name) and confirm the playtest type and scope before proceeding.


EXECUTION

Preflight Requirements

Verify before proceeding:

  • Playable build available
  • Test objectives defined
  • Participant criteria known

Step 1: Define Playtest Objectives

Ask the user (or infer from GDD/game brief):

  1. What are we testing?

    • Core gameplay loop
    • Specific feature
    • Difficulty curve
    • Tutorial effectiveness
    • Overall experience
  2. What decisions will this inform?

    • Design changes
    • Difficulty tuning
    • Feature prioritization
    • Ship/no-ship decision
  3. What metrics will we collect?

    • Completion rates
    • Time-on-task
    • Failure points
    • Player sentiment

Step 2: Choose Playtest Type

Present options and confirm with user:

Internal Playtest

Best for: Early validation, bug finding, quick iterations

AspectDetails
ParticipantsTeam members, other teams
Duration30-60 minutes
FrequencyWeekly or per-milestone
SetupMinimal, informal

External Playtest

Best for: Unbiased feedback, market validation

AspectDetails
ParticipantsTarget audience, external testers
Duration1-2 hours
FrequencyMonthly or milestone
SetupFormal, NDA if needed

Focused Playtest

Best for: Specific feature validation

AspectDetails
ParticipantsSelected for specific traits
Duration20-45 minutes
FrequencyAs needed
SetupSpecific build/scenario

Step 3: Create Session Structure

Pre-Session (10-15 min)

  1. Welcome & Context

    • Brief game description (no spoilers)
    • Session goals (what we're testing)
    • Comfort check (breaks, questions)
  2. Consent & Setup

    • Recording consent (if applicable)
    • Controller/input preferences
    • Any accessibility needs
  3. Instructions

    • "Play as you normally would"
    • "Think aloud if comfortable"
    • "There are no wrong answers"

Gameplay Session (30-90 min)

  1. Observation Focus Areas

    • Where do players get stuck?
    • What do they try first?
    • What surprises them?
    • Where do they express frustration/joy?
  2. Note-Taking Template

    [TIME] [LOCATION] [OBSERVATION] [PLAYER REACTION]
    0:05   Tutorial    Skipped help text    Seemed impatient
    0:12   Combat      Died to first enemy  Frustrated, retried
    
  3. Intervention Rules

    • Let players struggle (within reason)
    • Note when you want to help
    • Only intervene for:
      • Critical bugs
      • Genuine distress
      • Session time running out

Post-Session (10-20 min)

  1. Immediate Reactions

    • "What was your overall impression?"
    • "What stood out most?"
    • "Would you play again?"
  2. Specific Questions

    • Feature-specific feedback
    • Difficulty perception
    • Clarity of objectives
  3. Open Feedback

    • "Anything else?"
    • "Questions for us?"

Step 4: Create Observation Guide

CategorySignalsRecord
ConfusionPausing, wandering, repeating actionsLocation, duration
FrustrationSighing, repeated failures, quittingCause, frequency
EngagementLeaning in, exclaiming, continuingFeatures that work
BoredomChecking phone, disengagingDrop-off points

Quantitative Metrics:

  • Time to complete tutorial
  • Deaths per section
  • Items/features discovered
  • Session duration
  • Completion rate

Step 5: Generate Playtest Plan Document

Write {output_folder}/playtest-plan.md using the playtest-template.md structure:

# Playtest Plan: {Build/Feature Name}

## Overview

- Build version: {version}
- Session date(s): {dates}
- Objective: {primary goal}

## Participant Criteria

- Target: {player type}
- Experience: {gaming background}
- Count: {number}

## Session Structure

### Pre-Session (15 min)

- Welcome and consent
- Setup and preferences
- Brief instructions

### Gameplay (60 min)

- Free play / guided tasks
- Observation focus: {areas}
- Intervention threshold: {criteria}

### Post-Session (15 min)

- Immediate reactions
- Structured questions
- Open feedback

## Observation Guide

{observation_template}

## Data Collection

- Recording: {yes/no}
- Notes template: {attached}
- Metrics: {list}

## Team Roles

- Facilitator: {name}
- Note-taker: {name}
- Technical support: {name}

## Post-Playtest Analysis

- Session debrief: {date}
- Report due: {date}
- Action items review: {date}

Step 6: Post-Playtest Analysis Framework

Include in the plan document:

Synthesize Findings

  1. Pattern Identification

    • What issues appeared multiple times?
    • What worked consistently well?
  2. Severity Assessment

    • Critical: Blocks progression
    • Major: Significantly impacts experience
    • Minor: Noticeable but manageable
  3. Recommendations

    • Immediate fixes
    • Design considerations
    • Further investigation needed

Report Template

## Playtest Report: {Session}

### Summary

- Participants: {count}
- Completion rate: {%}
- Overall sentiment: {positive/mixed/negative}

### Key Findings

1. {Finding with evidence}
2. {Finding with evidence}

### Recommendations

| Issue   | Severity | Recommendation | Priority |
| ------- | -------- | -------------- | -------- |
| {issue} | {sev}    | {rec}          | {P0-P3}  |

### Quotes

> "{Notable player quote}" - Participant {N}

### Next Steps

1. {action item}
2. {action item}

Deliverables

  1. Playtest Plan Document — Session structure and logistics
  2. Observation Guide — What to watch for
  3. Note-Taking Template — Standardized recording
  4. Report Template — Post-session analysis format

Validation

Refer to checklist.md for validation criteria.

On Complete

Run: uv run {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --project-root {project-root} --key workflow.on_complete

If the resolved workflow.on_complete is non-empty, follow it as the final terminal instruction before exiting.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Game systems architect for technical architecture, engine design, and infrastructure. Use when the user asks to talk to Cloud Dragonborn or requests the Game Architect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio2492026年9月25日 更新

Game designer for creative vision, GDD creation, and narrative design. Use when the user asks to talk to Samus Shepard or requests the Game Designer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio2492026年9月25日 更新

Consolidated game developer for story execution, code implementation, code review, QA/test authorship, and sprint orchestration. Use when the user asks to talk to Link Freeman, the Game Developer, the Game QA, or the Game Scrum Master.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio2492026年9月25日 更新

Elite indie game developer for rapid prototyping and solo quick-flow development. Use when the user asks to talk to Indie or requests the Game Solo Dev.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio2492026年9月25日 更新

Technical documentation specialist and knowledge curator for game projects. Use when the user asks to talk to Paige or requests the Technical Writer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio2492026年9月25日 更新

Facilitate game brainstorming sessions with game-specific techniques. Use when the user says "brainstorm game" or "game ideas"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bmad-code-org/bmad-module-game-dev-studio2492026年9月25日 更新

bmad-code-org のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する