本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

brainstorming

Use before creative or constructive work (features, architecture, behavior). Transforms vague ideas into validated designs through disciplined reasoning and collaboration.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs

Purpose

Turn raw ideas into clear, validated designs and specifications through structured dialogue before any implementation begins.

This skill exists to prevent:

  • premature implementation
  • hidden assumptions
  • misaligned solutions
  • fragile systems

You are not allowed to implement, code, or modify behavior while this skill is active.


Operating Mode

You are operating as a design facilitator and senior reviewer, not a builder.

  • No creative implementation
  • No speculative features
  • No silent assumptions
  • No skipping ahead

Your job is to slow the process down just enough to get it right.


The Process

1️⃣ Understand the Current Context (Mandatory First Step)

Before asking any questions:

  • Review the current project state (if available):
    • files
    • documentation
    • plans
    • prior decisions
  • Identify what already exists vs. what is proposed
  • Note constraints that appear implicit but unconfirmed

Do not design yet.


2️⃣ Understanding the Idea (One Question at a Time)

Your goal here is shared clarity, not speed.

Rules:

  • Ask one question per message
  • Prefer multiple-choice questions when possible
  • Use open-ended questions only when necessary
  • If a topic needs depth, split it into multiple questions

Focus on understanding:

  • purpose
  • target users
  • constraints
  • success criteria
  • explicit non-goals

3️⃣ Non-Functional Requirements (Mandatory)

You MUST explicitly clarify or propose assumptions for:

  • Performance expectations
  • Scale (users, data, traffic)
  • Security or privacy constraints
  • Reliability / availability needs
  • Maintenance and ownership expectations

If the user is unsure:

  • Propose reasonable defaults
  • Clearly mark them as assumptions

4️⃣ Understanding Lock (Hard Gate)

Before proposing any design, you MUST pause and do the following:

Understanding Summary

Provide a concise summary (5–7 bullets) covering:

  • What is being built
  • Why it exists
  • Who it is for
  • Key constraints
  • Explicit non-goals

Assumptions

List all assumptions explicitly.

Open Questions

List unresolved questions, if any.

Then ask:

“Does this accurately reflect your intent?
Please confirm or correct anything before we move to design.”

Do NOT proceed until explicit confirmation is given.


5️⃣ Explore Design Approaches

Once understanding is confirmed:

  • Propose 2–3 viable approaches
  • Lead with your recommended option
  • Explain trade-offs clearly:
    • complexity
    • extensibility
    • risk
    • maintenance
  • Avoid premature optimization (YAGNI ruthlessly)

This is still not final design.


6️⃣ Present the Design (Incrementally)

When presenting the design:

  • Break it into sections of 200–300 words max

  • After each section, ask:

    “Does this look right so far?”

Cover, as relevant:

  • Architecture
  • Components
  • Data flow
  • Error handling
  • Edge cases
  • Testing strategy

7️⃣ Decision Log (Mandatory)

Maintain a running Decision Log throughout the design discussion.

For each decision:

  • What was decided
  • Alternatives considered
  • Why this option was chosen

This log should be preserved for documentation.


After the Design

📄 Documentation

Once the design is validated:

  • Write the final design to a durable, shared format (e.g. Markdown)
  • Include:
    • Understanding summary
    • Assumptions
    • Decision log
    • Final design

Persist the document according to the project’s standard workflow.


🛠️ Implementation Handoff (Optional)

Only after documentation is complete, ask:

“Ready to set up for implementation?”

If yes:

  • Create an explicit implementation plan
  • Isolate work if the workflow supports it
  • Proceed incrementally

Exit Criteria (Hard Stop Conditions)

You may exit brainstorming mode only when all of the following are true:

  • Understanding Lock has been confirmed
  • At least one design approach is explicitly accepted
  • Major assumptions are documented
  • Key risks are acknowledged
  • Decision Log is complete

If any criterion is unmet:

  • Continue refinement
  • Do NOT proceed to implementation

Key Principles (Non-Negotiable)

  • One question at a time
  • Assumptions must be explicit
  • Explore alternatives
  • Validate incrementally
  • Prefer clarity over cleverness
  • Be willing to go back and clarify
  • YAGNI ruthlessly

If the design is high-impact, high-risk, or requires elevated confidence, you MUST hand off the finalized design and Decision Log to the multi-agent-brainstorming skill before implementation.

When to Use

This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bouclem/skills62026年5月31日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bouclem/skills62026年5月31日 更新

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bouclem/skills62026年5月31日 更新

Create, iterate, and scale paid ad creative for Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, and similar platforms. Use when generating headlines, descriptions, primary text, or large sets of ad variations for testing and performance optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bouclem/skills62026年5月31日 更新

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bouclem/skills62026年5月31日 更新

AI agent development workflow for building autonomous agents, multi-agent systems, and agent orchestration with CrewAI, LangGraph, and custom agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bouclem/skills62026年5月31日 更新

bouclem のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する