本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

openspec-apply-change

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md8.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.

Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.

Input: Optionally specify a change name (e.g., /opsx:apply add-auth). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.

Steps

  1. Select the change

    If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:

    • Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
    • Auto-select if only one active change exists
    • If ambiguous, run openspec list --json to get available changes and ask the user to select one

    Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., /opsx:apply <other>).

  2. Check status to understand the schema

    openspec status --change "<name>" --json
    

    Parse the JSON to understand:

    • schemaName: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
    • planningHome, changeRoot, and actionContext: planning scope and edit constraints
    • Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
  3. Get apply instructions

    openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json
    

    This returns:

    • contextFiles: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs)
    • Progress (total, complete, remaining)
    • Task list with status
    • Dynamic instruction based on current state
    • Optional context: current required project instruction input from the selected root
    • Optional operationGuidance: current advisory guidance for apply

    Handle states:

    • If state: "blocked" (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using /opsx:continue (if it is not installed, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json to see the next artifact and openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json for how to create it)
    • If state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive
    • Otherwise: proceed to implementation

    Treat context as a required prompt-level input. Read and consider it, and apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints while implementing. Treat operationGuidance as optional additive advice. Read and consider every entry, and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in workflow.

    Keep both fields separate from CLI-returned state, missing artifacts, tasks, progress, contextFiles, and the built-in instruction. They are not evidence of task completion, do not replace the built-in instruction, and do not permit bypassing a blocked state. If context conflicts with the built-in instruction, an explicit user choice, or a CLI-controlled value, report the conflict and preserve the controlling value. If guidance is inapplicable or conflicts with those controlling inputs, do not follow it and explain why. These are prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.

  4. Read context files

    Read every file path listed under contextFiles from the apply instructions output. The files depend on the schema being used:

    • spec-driven: proposal, specs, design, tasks
    • Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output

    Do not copy context or operationGuidance verbatim into implementation files or planning artifacts unless the user separately asks for that content.

  5. Show current progress

    Display:

    • Schema being used
    • Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
    • Remaining tasks overview
    • Dynamic instruction from CLI
  6. Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)

    For each pending task:

    • Show which task is being worked on
    • Make the code changes required
    • Keep changes minimal and focused
    • Mark task complete in the tasks file: - [ ] → - [x]
    • Continue to next task

    Pause if:

    • Task is unclear → ask for clarification
    • Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
    • A task needs work beyond what the spec and tasks describe, or you are tempted to drop, narrow, defer, or accept exceptions to specified behavior to make it fit → surface the added scope and ask; do not absorb it silently
    • Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
    • User interrupts
  7. On completion or pause, show status

    Display:

    • Tasks completed this session
    • Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
    • If all done: suggest archive
    • If paused: explain why and wait for guidance

Output During Implementation

## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)

Working on task 3/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete

Working on task 4/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete

Output On Completion

## Implementation Complete

**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓

### Completed This Session
- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2
...

All tasks complete! You can archive this change with `/opsx:archive`.

Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)

## Implementation Paused

**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete

### Issue Encountered
<description of the issue>

**Options:**
1. <option 1>
2. <option 2>
3. Other approach

What would you like to do?

Guardrails

  • Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
  • Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
  • If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
  • If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
  • Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
  • Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
  • Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
  • When a task needs work beyond what the spec describes, surface the added scope and pause - never silently narrow, defer, or simplify away specified behavior
  • Only mark a task - [x] when its specified behavior is fully implemented, not when it is partially done or deferred
  • Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
  • Do not use context or operation guidance as proof that a task is complete
  • Apply relevant project context; report conflicts with controlling workflow inputs
  • Consider every guidance entry; explain any inapplicable or conflicting advice
  • Do not copy runtime context or operation guidance into implementation files or planning artifacts
  • Preserve CLI-controlled blocked/ready/all-done behavior and completion criteria

Fluid Workflow Integration

This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:

  • Can be invoked anytime: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
  • Allows artifact updates: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brain-up/brn652026年10月9日 更新

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brain-up/brn652026年10月9日 更新

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brain-up/brn652026年10月9日 更新

Sync delta specs from a change to main specs. Use when the user wants to update main specs with changes from a delta spec, without archiving the change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brain-up/brn652026年10月9日 更新

Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brain-up/brn652026年10月9日 更新

verify

無料

Run the backend verification loop after Kotlin/Spring code changes — Kotlin style + unit tests via `gradlew verify`, plus integration tests when repos/migrations changed — and drive fixes until green. Use after editing backend code or when the user asks to verify/check the build.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brain-up/brn652026年10月9日 更新

Brain-up のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する