本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

app-store-optimization

Improves visibility and conversion in the App Store and Google Play — metadata, keywords, screenshots, ratings, and the listing experience that turns an impression into an install. Use this to audit or optimize an app listing, plan a launch listing, diagnose poor install conversion, or improve store search visibility.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md3.7 KB
  • references/sources.md1.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

App store optimization

Two levers, and they are separate problems: being found, and being installed once found. Diagnose which is failing before changing anything.

Being found

The stores index different fields, so the same metadata does not work on both.

  • App name / title — the single heaviest field. Brand plus the primary descriptive term. Do not spend it on brand alone.
  • Subtitle and keyword field — no repetition across fields; duplicated terms are wasted characters, not reinforcement.
  • Long description — indexed on one store, effectively not on the other. Write it for the store that indexes it and for humans on the store that does not.
  • Category — pick where you can rank, not where you technically belong.

Target terms with real intent. Ranking first for a term nobody searches is a vanity result.

Being installed

Most visitors decide from the first screenshot and the rating, without scrolling or reading.

  • Screenshots — the first two carry the decision. Lead with the outcome or the core screen, with a caption stating the benefit. Never lead with an onboarding or login screen.
  • Icon — recognizable at actual size, distinct from category conventions. Test at real scale on a device.
  • Rating — the strongest single conversion factor. Prompt for review after a success moment, never on launch or mid-task.
  • Video — only if it demonstrates something a screenshot cannot. A weak one costs installs.

Reviews

Respond to negative reviews specifically and without defensiveness, naming the fix and its version where there is one. Prospects read the responses as much as the complaints, and a pattern of real answers converts.

Watch review text for recurring themes — it is the cheapest continuous product research available.

Testing

Change one element at a time and let it run a full weekly cycle; app traffic is strongly day-of-week seasonal. Attributing a lift to the wrong change is worse than not testing.

Sources

references/sources.md in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.

Tooling

The consoles are the source of truth: App Store Connect and Google Play Console, including their own experiment features — product page optimization and store listing experiments — which test on real store traffic rather than a simulation.

Keyword and competitor research: AppTweak, Sensor Tower, data.ai, AppFollow, and similar. Treat their volume estimates as directional; the stores do not publish the underlying numbers.

Review management and reply workflows live in the consoles or in the same tools, and replying is the part most teams skip.

Never

  • Chase a keyword the app does not deliver on. Installs from a mismatched query become one-star reviews and a worse ranking than you started with.
  • Change metadata, screenshots, and the icon in the same release. Nothing that moves afterward can be attributed.
  • Solicit ratings from a user mid-task. The prompt lands where frustration is highest and the score reflects that.
  • Ignore reviews on the version you just shipped. They are the fastest signal you will get that a release broke something.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Designs and audits who can reach what — authentication, authorization models, privileged access, service credentials, and joiner-mover-leaver process. Use this to design a permissions model, run an access review, reduce standing privilege, handle offboarding, set up SSO or MFA, manage service and machine credentials, or diagnose why permissions have sprawled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0282026年9月18日 更新

Concentrates marketing and sales effort on a named set of accounts rather than on volume — qualifying whether the model fits your economics at all, building the account list and the buying group inside each, tiering effort against account value, coordinating so the account experiences one campaign rather than several, and measuring account progression instead of leads. Use this to decide whether to run an account-based program, build one, or work out why an existing one produces activity and no pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0282026年9月18日 更新

Gets new users from signup to first real value — signup flow, onboarding, time-to-value, and the early experience that determines whether someone becomes a user or a lapsed account. Use this to design or fix signup and onboarding, diagnose why signups do not convert to active use, reduce time-to-value, or decide what a new user must accomplish first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0282026年9月18日 更新

Designs orchestrator-and-subagent hierarchies for a repository — splitting agents by exclusive write surface, pairing every producer with an independent auditor, and enforcing the split with a script that runs in CI. Use this whenever the user wants to set up, expand, audit, or fix a multi-agent or subagent structure for a codebase; asks how to divide work between agents; wants agent charters, roles, or a surface map written; or is hitting agents that collide on the same files, review their own work, or drift from their remit. Also use when sizing a roster or deciding whether a new agent is justified.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0282026年9月18日 更新

Governs models and AI systems in production — intended use, evaluation, monitoring, human oversight, documentation, and the decision to deploy or retire. Use this before deploying a model or AI feature, when defining evaluation criteria, when a model's behavior has drifted, when assessing AI risk or regulatory exposure, or when deciding whether an AI system is fit for a consequential decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0282026年9月18日 更新

Produces executive-level research — market sizing, competitor mapping, trend analysis, and strategic intelligence — grounded in cited sources with the confidence in each claim made explicit. Use this to analyze a market or industry, map competitors, evaluate a market-entry or build-versus-buy decision, produce a research brief, or assemble evidence for a decision. Also use when comparing options that need a structured, evidence-based verdict rather than an opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0282026年9月18日 更新

cbrock84 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する