Gets a product listed where buyers and crawlers look — directories, marketplaces, review sites, comparison pages, and aggregators. Use this to plan a submission push, choose which directories are worth the effort, prepare listing assets, build comparison and alternative pages, or manage presence on review platforms.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Low effort, compounding, and consistently under-done. Also easy to do in a way that wastes weeks.
Judge each by whether real buyers use it, not by domain authority. The directories worth the time are the ones your buyers already consult during evaluation.
Assemble a kit before submitting anywhere: descriptions at several lengths, logo and screenshots at the common sizes, category selections, feature list, pricing summary, and the founder or company details these forms always want. Submissions then take minutes instead of an afternoon each.
Keep the positioning identical across listings. Inconsistent descriptions across directories are both a brand problem and a signal problem.
The listings that most influence buyers. Claim the profile, complete it fully, and keep it current — a stale listing with old pricing costs deals.
Ask for reviews from customers at a success moment, never with an incentive tied to sentiment. Respond to every negative review specifically and without defensiveness; prospects read the responses more carefully than the reviews.
Pages targeting "X versus Y" and "alternatives to X" capture buyers already in evaluation, which is the highest-intent traffic available.
Write them honestly. Name where the competitor is genuinely better — a comparison that finds you superior on every axis is not believed, and buyers checking it against their own experience will discount the whole page. Keep them current; a comparison against a competitor's two-year-old feature set is worse than nothing.
Set a periodic sweep: listings drift out of date, and an aggregator showing your old pricing will outrank your own page for some queries.
references/sources.md in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions
here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before
answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free
to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Designs and audits who can reach what — authentication, authorization models, privileged access, service credentials, and joiner-mover-leaver process. Use this to design a permissions model, run an access review, reduce standing privilege, handle offboarding, set up SSO or MFA, manage service and machine credentials, or diagnose why permissions have sprawled.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Concentrates marketing and sales effort on a named set of accounts rather than on volume — qualifying whether the model fits your economics at all, building the account list and the buying group inside each, tiering effort against account value, coordinating so the account experiences one campaign rather than several, and measuring account progression instead of leads. Use this to decide whether to run an account-based program, build one, or work out why an existing one produces activity and no pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gets new users from signup to first real value — signup flow, onboarding, time-to-value, and the early experience that determines whether someone becomes a user or a lapsed account. Use this to design or fix signup and onboarding, diagnose why signups do not convert to active use, reduce time-to-value, or decide what a new user must accomplish first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs orchestrator-and-subagent hierarchies for a repository — splitting agents by exclusive write surface, pairing every producer with an independent auditor, and enforcing the split with a script that runs in CI. Use this whenever the user wants to set up, expand, audit, or fix a multi-agent or subagent structure for a codebase; asks how to divide work between agents; wants agent charters, roles, or a surface map written; or is hitting agents that collide on the same files, review their own work, or drift from their remit. Also use when sizing a roster or deciding whether a new agent is justified.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Governs models and AI systems in production — intended use, evaluation, monitoring, human oversight, documentation, and the decision to deploy or retire. Use this before deploying a model or AI feature, when defining evaluation criteria, when a model's behavior has drifted, when assessing AI risk or regulatory exposure, or when deciding whether an AI system is fit for a consequential decision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces executive-level research — market sizing, competitor mapping, trend analysis, and strategic intelligence — grounded in cited sources with the confidence in each claim made explicit. Use this to analyze a market or industry, map competitors, evaluate a market-entry or build-versus-buy decision, produce a research brief, or assemble evidence for a decision. Also use when comparing options that need a structured, evidence-based verdict rather than an opinion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。