本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

skill-authoring

Writes and revises agent skills so they trigger at the right moments and give usable instruction when they do. Use this when creating a new skill, editing an existing one, diagnosing a skill that fires too often or never fires, or reviewing a set of skills for overlap. Also use before adding to a skill library, to check the capability is not already covered.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md3.0 KB
  • references/sources.md864 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Skill authoring

A skill is judged twice: on whether it loads at the right moment, and on whether it helps once loaded. Most fail the first test.

The description does the triggering

It is the only part read when deciding whether to load. Write it for that job:

  • Lead with what the skill does, in one clause.
  • Then when to reach for it — the situations, in the words someone would actually use, including the oblique ones ("why isn't this converting" as well as "CRO audit").
  • Name the edge cases that should still trigger it, and where useful, what should not.

Vague descriptions produce two failures at once: the skill misses cases it should catch, and fires on cases it cannot help.

The body does the work

Write for someone competent who has not thought about this problem today. That means:

  • Method over exhortation. "Be thorough" is noise. An ordered procedure is instruction.
  • State the failure behind each rule. A rule with no failure attached gets optimized away by the next reader.
  • Be specific enough to be wrong. Guidance too hedged to contradict is too vague to follow.
  • Put long material in references/ and say when to read it. The body should fit in working memory.

Overlap is the silent killer

Two skills whose descriptions both match a request means neither reliably wins. Before adding one, check what already covers the ground. Prefer extending an existing skill, or consolidating the family into one skill with references, over adding a near-neighbor.

Mechanics

  • name must be lowercase-hyphenated and equal the directory name, or the skill will not load.
  • One skill, one directory, SKILL.md at its root; supporting material in references/ and scripts/.

Verify before shipping

Write three requests that should trigger it and two that should not, and check the description actually discriminates. If a near-miss request would pull it in, tighten the description.

Sources

references/sources.md in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.

Never

  • Ship a skill whose description does not say when to use it. A skill that never triggers is dead weight.
  • Write a skill that restates what the model already does well without prompting.
  • Let two skills claim the same trigger. Move the boundary or merge them.
  • Ship without running the skill against the case that motivated writing it.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Designs and audits who can reach what — authentication, authorization models, privileged access, service credentials, and joiner-mover-leaver process. Use this to design a permissions model, run an access review, reduce standing privilege, handle offboarding, set up SSO or MFA, manage service and machine credentials, or diagnose why permissions have sprawled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0282026年9月18日 更新

Concentrates marketing and sales effort on a named set of accounts rather than on volume — qualifying whether the model fits your economics at all, building the account list and the buying group inside each, tiering effort against account value, coordinating so the account experiences one campaign rather than several, and measuring account progression instead of leads. Use this to decide whether to run an account-based program, build one, or work out why an existing one produces activity and no pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0282026年9月18日 更新

Gets new users from signup to first real value — signup flow, onboarding, time-to-value, and the early experience that determines whether someone becomes a user or a lapsed account. Use this to design or fix signup and onboarding, diagnose why signups do not convert to active use, reduce time-to-value, or decide what a new user must accomplish first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0282026年9月18日 更新

Designs orchestrator-and-subagent hierarchies for a repository — splitting agents by exclusive write surface, pairing every producer with an independent auditor, and enforcing the split with a script that runs in CI. Use this whenever the user wants to set up, expand, audit, or fix a multi-agent or subagent structure for a codebase; asks how to divide work between agents; wants agent charters, roles, or a surface map written; or is hitting agents that collide on the same files, review their own work, or drift from their remit. Also use when sizing a roster or deciding whether a new agent is justified.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0282026年9月18日 更新

Governs models and AI systems in production — intended use, evaluation, monitoring, human oversight, documentation, and the decision to deploy or retire. Use this before deploying a model or AI feature, when defining evaluation criteria, when a model's behavior has drifted, when assessing AI risk or regulatory exposure, or when deciding whether an AI system is fit for a consequential decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0282026年9月18日 更新

Produces executive-level research — market sizing, competitor mapping, trend analysis, and strategic intelligence — grounded in cited sources with the confidence in each claim made explicit. Use this to analyze a market or industry, map competitors, evaluate a market-entry or build-versus-buy decision, produce a research brief, or assemble evidence for a decision. Also use when comparing options that need a structured, evidence-based verdict rather than an opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0282026年9月18日 更新

cbrock84 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する